Money

Why inflation figures may have given Labour false confidence

The relief from Downing Street at yesterday’s inflation data – which showed that it dipped to 2.5 per cent in the 12 months to December, down from 2.6 per cent the month before – was palpable. Darren Jones, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, cast a breezy image as he described his boss, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves, as “brilliant”. The choices facing Reeves and Starmer would be bleak Keir Starmer will now be able to offer his Chancellor more than lukewarm assurances that she is not facing the chop. The news will abate the recent cycle of media criticism and with President Trump’s inauguration next week, focus will soon turn elsewhere.  Her

Kate Andrews

Inflation dip marks a welcome surprise for Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves has found brief respite this morning, with the Office for National Statistics confirming that inflation dipped to 2.5 per cent in the 12 months to December, down from 2.6 per cent the month before. This is a smaller rise than had been expected (the consensus was 2.6 per cent) and roughly in line with the Bank of England’s forecast from November, which had predicted a 2.4 per cent increase. It’s welcome news for a Chancellor who is under pressure. Core inflation slowed too, from 3.5 per cent in the year to November, to 3.2 per cent in December. This competes for the best news in the update, as core

How much longer will Starmer back Reeves?

It’s not been a happy new year for Sir Keir Starmer. The Prime Minister’s Treasury minister Tulip Siddiq has been forced out following an anti-corruption investigation in Bangladesh. Siddiq’s job became untenable following questions over links to her aunt, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina. Siddiq has denied wrongdoing and an independent investigation found that she had not breached the Ministerial Code, but it was clear over the weekend that Siddiq’s position was untenable. Starmer, however, bafflingly allowed to her to stay on until yesterday afternoon. ‘Starmer dithered and delayed to protect his close friend,’ says Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. It’s hard to disagree with that assessment. Reeves’

Kate Andrews

Rachel Reeves is getting ready for the next market test

Rachel Reeves did her best to keep today’s China visit statement on topic. The Chancellor wanted to talk about ‘cooperation’, ‘competing where our interests differ,’ her efforts to break down market barriers and the £600 million she secured in investment. But other MPs had other ideas.  ‘I know the Chancellor has been away,’ said the Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride. ‘So let me update her on the mess she left behind.’ So began the battle between the Chancellor – to stay on topic – and her opposition to bring up the long list of economic woes that have come to the forefront this week: not just the substantial rise in borrowing

James Kirkup

Why Westminster is wrong about gilt yields

It’s gilts season at Westminster. This is one of those unpredictable events, like the passing of a comet, that sees the residents of the political village staring at the skies and imputing all sorts of divine causes to the curious flashing lights they see there.   Because of the ongoing excitement in the markets, a lot of political folk have, in the last few days, become authoritative commentators on yield curves. Welcome to the party, guys. A very long time ago, I covered bond markets for a City newswire, and hated pretty much every minute of it. I claim no particular expertise as a result, but I am still confident in

Ross Clark

Europe’s car industry is under attack on all fronts

It is half a century since Britain’s native car industry embarked on its long, painful decline, precipitated by Austin Allegros with rear windows falling off, endless strikes over the length of tea breaks and terrible commercial decisions such as to cede the hatchback market to overseas competition. But where Britain led, Germany and France now seem to be following. How much longer before names like Peugeot, Renault, and even Volkswagen, either disappear or become reduced to mere badges affixed to Chinese-designed and produced vehicles? The retreat of the European car industry has cropped up from time to time in recent months. In October, Volkswagen announced, for the first time, its intention to

Trump’s team will show Rachel Reeves how it’s done

As Trump Treasury Secretary nominee Scott Bessent rises, full of promise for his confirmation hearing in Washington next week, the UK is still reeling from a plunge in the value of the pound and a sharp rise in borrowing costs, directly tied to Rachel Reeves’s economic policies. The contrast in the approaches of these respective leaders could hardly be more stark. Bessent, a figure whose appointment has Wall Street buzzing with optimism, contrasts sharply with Rachel Reeves, whose policies, compounded by the net zero fanaticism of Ed Miliband, are proving to be the harbinger of economic catastrophe. This comparison isn’t just about individual competence; it’s about the contrasting philosophies of

Ross Clark

AI won’t save Britain with one quick trick

Obviously, artificial Intelligence (AI) is a boom industry that will transform many other industries and make fortunes for some people. Anyone should want Britain to be involved and earn itself a slice of the AI pie. Why, then, does the government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan depress me? Apparently, according to Keir Starmer, it is going to turn Britain into an ‘AI superpower’. There are going to be AI growth zones, and the public sector is going to be at the forefront. AI is going to help teachers plan lessons, help councils speed up decisions on planning applications, even help mend potholes – all the biggest public sector failures, in other

Ian Williams

Labour’s kowtowing to China will cost Britain

When the security services accessed the mobile phone of Yang Tengbo, the alleged Chinese spy who became a confidant and business partner of the Duke of York, they found a document in which Yang said of the duke, ‘He is in a desperate situation and will grab onto anything’. We can only assume there are memos circulating in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) this week describing the visit by Rachel Reeves in similar terms. Starmer and his ministers appear to be competing to see who can kowtow the lowest before Xi The hapless duke’s entanglement with Yang, whose exclusion from Britain was confirmed shortly before Christmas, was held up as

Kate Andrews

Rachel Reeves is making the same mistake as Liz Truss

Rachel Reeves returns from China this morning to face growing accusations that she has lost her grip on the public finances. This latest bond market crisis has brought into question whether the Chancellor is at risk of – or has already – broken her own fiscal rules. Capital Economics reports that a surge in gilt yields – which are at their highest levels since the financial crash – means that her £12 billion of fiscal headroom is now gone. The Treasury will be desperately hoping that something, anything, calms the markets this week and sees borrowing costs start to fall. Reports that the Chancellor has called on ministers to come

Ross Clark

Liz Truss’s legal threat against Keir Starmer is a mistake

In politics as in everyday life it is possible to be right at the same time as being terribly, terribly wrong. Look no further than Liz Truss instructing her lawyers to send a ‘cease and desist letter’ to Keir Starmer demanding that he stops accusing her of “crashing the economy”. The claim, she alleges, is not only false but contributed to her losing her South West Norfolk seat in last year’s general election. Truss is right, as it happens – the mini budget delivered by her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng during her micro-premiership may have precipitated a run on bond markets, but it had little effect on the economy, and Britain did

Kate Andrews

Borrowing costs have just passed Liz Truss levels

The new year may have rustled up some surprise stand-offs for the Labour government (mainly calls from X founder Elon Musk for Keir Starmer to resign), but the rise of new problems does not mean the old problems have disappeared. A harsh reminder has been dished out this morning, as long-term borrowing costs reached a 27-year high, calling into question yet again exactly how the Treasury is going to make good on its spending commitments while sticking to the Chancellor’s own fiscal rules. Thirty-year gilt yields hit 5.21 per cent this morning – a level that surpasses the surge in borrowing costs following Liz Truss’s mini-Budget in 2022. The ten-year

Matthew Lynn

Will taxpayers get their satellite bailout money back?

When the British government spent £400 million on the satellite internet start-up OneWeb back in 2020, it was seen as precisely the kind of active, tech-led industrial strategy that could re-boot the British economy. There were hopes the deal would help secure a place for the UK at the heart of the emerging space economy. Then prime minister Boris Johnson saw it as a key part of launching ‘Galactic Britain’. But four years on, the taxpayer is on the hook for a £300 million paper loss after shares in OneWeb’s parent company sank to a record low. The money poured into OneWeb has proved to be remarkably poor value Even

Ross Clark

What happened to ‘growth, growth, growth’?

This is hardly how 2024 was supposed to end for Labour. Free from the shackles of ‘14 years of Tory misrule’, the economy was supposed to take off. ‘Growth, growth, growth,’ Keir Starmer told us, a little unconvincingly, were going to be the government’s three main priorities. Indeed, Britain was going to tear away as the fastest-growing economy in the G7 – although he never offered us any explanation as to why this would be the case, still less which of his policies was going to achieve it. This morning’s revised GDP figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reaffirm just how big a failure the government’s economic policies

Michael Simmons

Why Britain’s benefits problem is likely to get worse

More than half of Britons receive more from the state than they pay in taxes, according to figures from the Office for National Statistics. The proportion of those receiving more through benefits than they paid in taxes last year fell slightly to 52.6 per cent, down a percentage point compared with the year before. The data – which factors in use of public services, such as schools and the NHS, as well as welfare payments and benefits – highlights the fundamental problem underlying the British state: how do we support a population that is aging, getting ill and becoming increasingly workshy? As you’d expect, more than 85 per cent of

Labour has walked into a net-zero trap of its own making

The government’s net-zero noose draws tighter. At energy questions in the House of Commons on Tuesday, the Conservative MP Charlie Dewhirst asked the Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband if the recent report by the National Energy System Operator (Neso) projected higher or lower bills under his policies. Miliband replied that Neso forecast lower overall costs. ‘It is completely logical to say that that will lead to a reduction in bills,’ he said. Logic and historic data point in the opposite direction. Between 2009 and 2020, the average price of electricity sold by the Big Six energy companies rose by 67 per cent from 10.71p per kilowatt hour

Matthew Lynn

Rachel Reeves has shattered economic confidence in Britain

A few journalists have pointed it out. So have some Conservative and Reform MPs, think tanks and one or two of the City banks. Now, it is official: the Bank of England (BofE) has warned that Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s October Budget has caused Britain’s economy to stagnate. The real question now is when will the pressure on Reeves to reverse some of the measures in her catastrophically misjudged Budget become so intense that she has to give in? For a central Bank, the language was about as harsh as it gets. In its latest assessment of the economy, while keeping interest rates on hold, the BoE argued that businesses were

Kate Andrews

It’s not surprising the Bank of England didn’t cut interest rates

Interest rates have been held at 4.75 per cent. The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee voted 6-3 to maintain the base rate, with the minority voting to further reduce rates by 0.25 percentage points. This is an unsurprising move from the Bank of England. Markets weren’t optimistic that another rate cut would follow so soon after last month’s 0.25 percentage point cut. But after this week’s labour market data – showing that wages are up – and inflation data – showing prices up, too – it was highly unlikely a cautious Bank was going to push ahead with another rate cut this month. Today’s minutes reflect these concerns. ‘Services consumer price inflation has remained

France’s defence spending debacle will infuriate Donald Trump

Donald Trump is right that some of Nato’s European members are essentially freeloaders. That these countries are holding talks about increasing the alliance’s target for defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP at its annual summit next June comes too little, too late. Countries like Germany and France have consistently underspent on defence, leaving Europe reliant on the United States as an ultimate guarantor of the continent’s security. When he takes office in January, Trump won’t stand for this. The political chaos in France is unlikely to reassure the president elect that Europe has got its act together when it comes to defence spending. The fall of Michel Barnier’s

Ross Clark

Ofgem’s standing charge crackdown is a win for the wealthy

At last some good news for owners of second homes: Ofgem has ordered electricity providers to offer tariffs which have no standing charges, but where instead householders pay more per unit of electricity consumed. True, it isn’t second-home owners which Ofgem had in mind when it came up with the idea, rather low income consumers whom it believes are losing out under the current system. But there is no question as to whom will be the biggest beneficiaries: people who only use their properties occasionally. If you visit your Cornish clifftop mansion for only four weeks a year you stand to make a substantial saving. Standing charges have become the