Sie sehen sich mit widersprüchlichen Meinungen in Ihrem Team konfrontiert. Wie stellen Sie effektive Entscheidungsprozesse sicher?

1. Listen to Everyone: Hear out each team member's opinion and concern. 2. Define the Problem: Clearly state the problem or goal you're trying to solve. 3. Look at Options: Brainstorm possible solutions together. 4. Weigh Pros and Cons: Discuss the good and bad points of each option. 5. Agree on Criteria: Decide what's most important when making the decision. 6. Make a Collective Decision: Choose the best option based on the criteria. 7. Explain the Decision: Tell everyone why the decision was made. 8. Review and Learn: Check how the decision went and learn from it.

Foster active listening: - Give each team member your undivided attention - Maintain eye contact and nonverbal engagement - Paraphrase and summarize what each team member says to ensure understanding - Ask clarifying questions to ensure you grasp their perspective - Avoid interrupting or dismissing others' views.

Frame the Decision: start with the main issue. Clearly define the problem or goal you’re trying to achieve. Team: gather the right people to participate in the decision-making process. Timeframe: need to know the deadline. Approach to handle the situation: Decide whether you’ll use a command, consultative, consensus, or voting approach. Foster open dialogue. Allow team members to share their viewpoints, ask questions, and challenge assumptions. Navigate Group Dynamics: Be aware of power dynamics, biases, and communication styles. Ensure Implementation Readiness: Consider logistics, resources, and potential obstacles. Achieve Closure and Alignment: Once a decision is made, communicate it clearly.

Listening is first and most important for good leaders. Listening is the tools to understand problem within others shoes. Listening is give borader idea on define solution.

Es muy importante escuchar las opiniones de todo el equipo. Diferentes perspectivas pueden ampliar la visión del problema. Con eso en mente, creo las decisiones finales deben ser una definición del líder, no de mayorías circunstanciales.

Encourage dialogue is important to deliver and provide the different thoughts from others. Encourage team to discuss all problem and new innovative in forum. Thinks from multiple minds are always give more ideas.

Encouraging dialogue within a team amidst conflicting opinions is crucial for effective decision-making. This involves creating a supportive environment where each team member feels safe and respected. Active listening plays a key role, ensuring every perspective is heard without judgment. Open-ended questions encourages deeper exploration , Redirecting the conversation back to the main topic when it strays ensures focus on finding optimal solutions. By nurturing an atmosphere of openness and mutual understanding, the team can engage in constructive dialogue where diverse viewpoints are actively considered. This approach not only enhances decision quality but also fosters team cohesion and morale, affirming each member's value.

When team members are allowed to express their fears and securities, it makes them have confidence on the management and also builds genuine team growth for the organization.

Dialogue exposes all differences. It is through constructive dialogue that people can iron out their differences and map a constructive way forward. Listen to allbody, allow them to express themselves unreservedly, let the other part do the same, they will definitely reach common ground!

One of the ways to manage constructive decision making with a team is to clearly define the objective. It doesn't just help other team members but also help the leader to be organized in discussions/dialogue that will give rise to decision. This also helps to manage time and resources available to get to a conclusive position. It serves as a way to sieve personal issues from the motive of discussions. Whoever is coordinating the discussion will also have a picture of the essence of dialogue/discussion. Clear definition and constant reminder of objective of the decision is powerful in reaching a valid position within team.

Quando traçamos todos os objetivos e damos nome a eles, claro que existes as opiniões divergentes, o nosso papel é de fato ouvir o ponto de atrito e trazer contribuições do foco da empresa para o projeto, para que todos entendam qual nosso objetivos. Gosto muito de aplicar perguntas e respostas do tipo: e se esse caminho der errado, qual a nossa postura para voltar ao caminho?

One important thing I have found is knowing your team's learning style before anything else. It's helpful whether it's a small or large team, as being an effective team matters the most. No matter how clear the objectives are or how hard you've tried to include everyone's opinion (which is not always doable), it won't stop people from feeling unsupported. Once you know how to communicate with individuals, and that's what you want for your team, there'll be less room for disappointment and misunderstanding. By providing your team with effective skills to help them understand an issue, they will face fewer problems and be ready to take on anything discussed.

Define clearly the objectives. Defining the objectives provides good basis for the argument, fostering collaboration and peaceful resolution. It serves as a pointer and proper guide to effective decision making.

Explore alternatives for me could mean consulting or speaking with experienced people, within and outside the organization. This will help in making an informed decision though conditions may differ, there are always similarities and something to pick from when consulting. I remember my responsibility of issuing accommodation space as camp manager, but there was a view of senior officers who felt they needed some leverage to make input on where there are to stay. Tough situation I must say as my team insisted we stick to already established guidelines but then I had to speak with a senior colleague from another organization and his view helped me in resolving that problem.

Explorar alternativas es crucial para integrar opiniones contradictorias. Al presentar y evaluar todas las opciones viables en equipo, se asegura una consideración completa de posibilidades y se fomenta una comprensión más profunda entre los miembros del equipo. Este proceso no solo puede revelar compromisos o soluciones innovadoras, sino también facilitar la aceptación colectiva al evaluar objetivamente diferentes enfoques.

Exploring all viable options is crucial for effective decision-making. I facilitate the team in collectively weighing the pros and cons of each alternative. This process not only ensures comprehensive consideration of all possibilities but also enhances mutual understanding among team members. By objectively evaluating different approaches, we can uncover innovative solutions or compromises that might not have been apparent initially, leading to decisions that have broad support.

J'ai pu observer que l'exploration des alternatives est une méthode efficace pour sortir des impasses. Encourager l'équipe à proposer plusieurs solutions et à évaluer les avantages et inconvénients de chacune permet de trouver des compromis acceptables. En tant que chef de projet, j'ai souvent utilisé des techniques de brainstorming et d'analyse SWOT pour susciter la créativité et identifier des options innovantes qui n'avaient pas été envisagées initialement.

En réunion partir du principe que potentiellement tout le monde a raison et essayer de comprendre comment les personnes en sont arrivés a ce raisonnement. Ce n'est pas facile de partir du principe que l'interlocuteur peut avoir raison et pas nous, l'exercice de trouver des arguments qui vont appuyer la position de notre interlocuteur peut être un outil

Perfeito! Chegar a um consenso faz com que a equipe fique empoderada, até porque quando nós ativamos a escuta ativa, as decisões não são mas do gestor e sim o melhor caminho para atingir o objetivo do processo.

I guess we should support the arguments from the team members and then find some points where we can develop consensus among them by creating some points which does not affect any member emotions or opinions.

With the advice I got from consulting, I was able to reach a consensus with my team as to what to do and I did and nothing of such rose again throughout my stay as camp/facility manager of a project site.

De fato, alcançar um consenso pode ser um desafio, especialmente quando as opiniões variam. para facilitar esse processo: 1. Escuta Ativa: Incentive todos a expressar suas opiniões e preocupações. Isso não só ajuda a criar um ambiente respeitoso, mas também pode trazer à tona perspectivas valiosas que podem influenciar a decisão final. 2.Negociação e Compromisso**: Esteja disposto a ceder em algumas áreas. O compromisso é frequentemente necessário para que todos se sintam incluídos e que suas opiniões foram consideradas. 3. Foco no Objetivo Comum : Lembre a equipe do objetivo maior, que é o sucesso do projeto e o bem-estar da equipe. Isso pode ajudar a alinhar os interesses individuais.

É importante considerar os diferentes pontos de vista da equipe para identificar o ponto de conflito e, a partir disso, buscar o consenso. Opiniões diferentes sempre irão existir, mas é fundamental escutar cada uma delas para direcionar a um acordo em comum em relação ao que é melhor para o projeto ou atividade em questão.

The Principle of Democratic Decision-making is Subject to Limitations : Decision based on democratic principle could be very good. But such decisions must be taken with care and cautiousness weighing the pros and cons.Sometimes there may be subgroup within a team, taking decision based on majority may be risk taking. Several time it must have been noted that majority may try to dominate with very ordinary opinion which may not constructive. The Leader must listen to all the opinions presented attentively and write it down. Then each opinion be discussed with patience assessing it's consequences . The leader must lead the group to brainstorm in conducive and respectful manner being assertive. Then the most impactful opinion be considered.

When consensus is elusive, democratic decision-making can break the deadlock. I ensure the team understands and agrees that the majority’s decision will be respected. This method ensures inclusivity and fairness, giving everyone a say in the final outcome. It reinforces the value of each team member’s input while providing a clear path forward. This approach also helps in maintaining momentum and avoiding prolonged stalemates.

Ouvir atentamente considerando aplicável a decisão democrática faz com que os colabores sintam se ouvidos e acolhidos e com que ele se sinta parte da estrutura e da equipe

not necessarily every decision should be made democratically, sometime you take the team members on board after carefully listening and dialogue with them you make decisions which may be not acceptable to few but the majority must be convinced.

To ensure effective decision-making processes within a team, it's essential to employ democratic methods while maintaining respect for all individuals involved. After gathering everyone's opinions, a reliable approach is to conduct a vote, allowing each team member to express their preference, with the most popular option being chosen. Another valuable method is striving for consensus, which may involve making compromises and adjustments to ensure that the final decision reflects a general agreement among team members.

To ensure effective decision-making in a team despite conflicting opinions, it's essential to foster open communication, which means creating a safe space where everyone can express their views. Active listening helps ensure that all team members feel heard, and clear objectives/key results keeps discussions goal-oriented. Decisions should be based on data and evidence, & with constructive debate focus should be turned towards solutions instead of conflicts. Striving for consensus is important, but one must be prepared to make decisive calls when necessary. Clearly defining roles and responsibilities also aids in the decision-making process.

J'ai pu observer que, malgré tous les efforts pour parvenir à un consensus ou une décision démocratique, il arrive parfois que le manager doive trancher. Dans ce cas, il est essentiel de le faire de manière transparente et justifiée, en expliquant les raisons derrière la décision finale. La clé est de rester bienveillant et respectueux, en montrant que toutes les opinions ont été considérées avec soin. En fin de compte, la responsabilité du manager est d'assurer le bon déroulement des projets et la cohésion de l'équipe, même si cela implique de prendre des décisions difficiles.

While number 6 is paramount for consensus, mining opinions periodically beforehand can ensure unity in final decisions. Someone will always have an alternate opinion, have them show how it solves the issues overall in application.