Carbon Drawdown Initiative hat dies direkt geteilt
“𝘏𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 $𝘟 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 $𝘠 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳?” I started asking this question when I talked to founders of climate companies I thought had high potential. It is a good test of their ambition, their trust in themselves. Sometimes founders design their initial funding round around a not-too-crazy amount they think they can raise to get started, instead of whatever moonshot they could actually be targeting if they think big. Maybe because they don’t believe potential investors would share their crazy beliefs? Our mission is to speed up negative emissions. We want to move results from the future a little bit more into the present with our impact investments. We want ambitious founders. That is why we would rather be interested in an X-investment than an Y-investment. Scaling CDR technologies requires more than clever experiments and well-intentioned founders. We also need speed. Sometimes one of the simplest levers to go faster is to invest more capital. Not for all projects of course, sometimes a smaller bet will generate plenty of learnings already. So when I talk to founders with big ideas, that’s the bottom line—will our investment make the project or experiment or technology progress further than currently possible and on an accelerated timeline? If yes, then it is something for us. When people ask why Carbon Drawdown Initiative invests in unproven technologies and risky science, I offer a simple answer: the purpose of our investment is to spark and fuel the next big idea. If an investment can give that crazy idea better traction, it’s money well spent.