Save

Adopting a Combination of Labour-Saving Mechanisms for Increasing Rural Women’s Participation in Livelihood Strategies in Busega District in Tanzania

In: The African Review
Authors:
Deborah A. Ngusa Institute of Development Studies, University of Dodoma P.O. Box 395, Dodoma Tanzania

Search for other papers by Deborah A. Ngusa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rehema G. Kilonzo Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Dodoma P.O. Box 395, Dodoma Tanzania

Search for other papers by Rehema G. Kilonzo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Edwin E. Ngowi Institute of Development Studies, University of Dodoma P.O. Box 395, Dodoma Tanzania

Search for other papers by Edwin E. Ngowi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€35.00

Abstract

The paper aims at examining rural women’s adoption of a combination of labour-saving mechanisms such as improved water supplies and harvesting techniques, cooking facilities and means of transport for household chores with its implications in diversifying livelihood strategies in Busega District of Tanzania. The study adopted Diffusion of Innovations Theory to explain the importance of adopting labour-saving mechanisms to reduce rural women’s workload and save time for diversifying livelihood strategies. The study employed cross-sectional research design to collect data from 210 rural women. Household survey, interviews, focus group discussions and non-participant observations were used to collect primary data. Cross-tabulation, One-way ANOVA, five point Likert scale and multiple logistic regression were employed to analyse quantitative data. Content analysis was employed to analyse qualitative data. The study revealed that, 61.43% of rural women were limited to adopt any kind of labour-saving mechanisms. In addition, the multiple logistic regression revealed significant differences at p-value of 0.05 for the likelihood of diversifying livelihood strategies. As such, rural women’s participation in livelihood strategies differed greatly based on the ability to adopt labour-saving mechanisms for reducing the workload of household chores. The study recommends that development stakeholders should implement development programmes centred on increasing prospects of adopting a combination of labour-saving mechanisms for reducing the burden of household chores to save time for diversifying livelihood strategies.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 612 102 15
Full Text Views 143 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 90 3 0
  翻译: