Quels sont les avantages et les inconvénients de travailler en tant que responsable interne de la protection de la vie privée des données par rapport à un consultant?

I think there are pro's and con's of both being in-house and being a consultant. In-house you can really go deep inside an organization and learn broadly about the privacy program in place at that specific company. You can really feel part of the team. The con is that you don't get the ability to see multiple privacy programs. As a consultant, you can really learn from the ability to see multiple privacy programs in many different industries. You can see what works and doesn't work from seeing so many company's privacy programs. The con is that you may never feel like you can experience success because you move on to the next project so quickly. You also may not feel like you are getting deep knowledge about any one privacy program.

As a consultant, you get paid more than in-house staff to say the same things they’re already saying but with a better chance of being listened to. You can choose your own learning and development pathways, work across a broad horizon and diversify your expertise. However, the life of a consultant is precarious, has less of a safety net in the event of illness or changes to life circumstances and can be lonely. In-house, you will have the opportunity to dig much deeper into organisational culture and practices, make more of a long-term impact, and enjoy employee benefits. You do risk your expertise stagnating though, so staying in one post for more than 5 years is probably not advisable, unless you’re getting paid top-end market rates

While working as an in-house data privacy officer has its own advantages in terms of better visibility of the business and contributing to the company by undertaking initiatives to enhance the privacy culture. However, a consultant is likely to get more exposure as the role requires interaction with clients from all sectors resulting in getting acquainted with more practical knowledge and better understanding of the market.

Trabajar como DPO interno ofrece un conocimiento profundo de la empresa, permitiendo una gestión de más integrada y personalizada. La proximidad con las operaciones diarias facilita la implementación de políticas y procedimientos y la respuesta rápida ante incidentes. Sin embargo, puede haber conflictos de interés y limitaciones en la independencia, afectando la objetividad. Un consultor externo de protección de datos aporta una perspectiva imparcial y especializada, con experiencia diversa de múltiples sectores. Esto enriquece las estrategias de protección de datos con prácticas probadas. No obstante, la falta de familiaridad continua con las operaciones internas de la empresa puede afectar significativamente a su función.

Working as an in-house privacy counsel or as a consultant/outside-counsel each has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. If you work in-house, you'll get to know one company's privacy program very well and feel like you're really part of their team. The downside is you'll only see how things are done in that one place. As a consultant, you'll get to see how lots of different companies handle privacy, which can help you learn a lot. You'll understand what generally works and what doesn't by seeing many examples. The downside is that it might be hard to feel really proud of your work since you move from one project to another quickly. Also, you might not get the chance to learn about any one company's policies in great depth.

Outsourcing data privacy consulting services can be more cost-effective than hiring full-time privacy professionals, especially for smaller organizations or those with limited resources, as it allows them to access specialized expertise on an as-needed basis.

Refletindo sobre as diferenças de remuneração e esforço, percebo que a principal distinção reside no retorno sobre o tempo e trabalho investidos. Funcionários internos recebem um salário fixo mensal, que permanece constante independentemente de horas extras ou trabalho em feriados e finais de semana. Em contraste, consultores têm a vantagem de serem remunerados proporcionalmente ao tempo dedicado: quanto mais horas trabalhadas em um projeto, maior é a probabilidade de um retorno financeiro maior. Essa dinâmica cria um cenário onde os consultores são diretamente recompensados por esforços extraordinários, ao contrário dos funcionários internos.

As an Internal DPO, one benefits from in-depth knowledge and ongoing influence within a single organization, ensuring job stability and building long-term relationships. However, this role faces less variety and potential internal political challenges. On the other hand, a Data Privacy Consultant experiences greater variety and flexibility by working with multiple clients and adapting to different environments. This can potentially offer higher earnings but comes with uncertainty and a constant need for self-promotion. While the DPO has a sustainable impact within an organization, the consultant influences a wide range of privacy practices, though their client relationships are often shorter and more transactional.

Como consultor te vas a enterar de lo que te quieran contar, normalmente tarde y para pasar auditoría o inspección. Como interno, puedes reportar mejor, tener aliados, investigar de manera interna y entender todo el flujo de datos del negocio.

compensation will vary based on the role of the in-house privacy officer, depending on how many functions, whether they have global or national experience, what areas they specialize in within privacy (contracts, product, marketing, cyber, program management, HR). Additionally, you take into consideration their location and years of experience in the space. And true privacy professionals, and to the industry is easily because they were able to apply those transferable privacy skills in any industry.

"How you do one thing is how you do everything". If you were a workaholic as an employee, don't expect to magically learn how to balance your hours as a consultant. If you're unfulfilled as an employee because you don't care for boring tasks, the same will be true as a consultant when you have to deal with admin or invoicing. For most consultants that I know and have succeeded, their motivation was never large fees and work life balance but: meaningful work, a desire for entrepreneurship, or genuinely finding yourself being sought after by people needing your help. How Work life Balance looks can change from country to county, industry to industry... Don't use that as a sole measurement!

Best practices: In-house Data Privacy Officer: Navigate office dynamics diplomatically, seek professional development opportunities, and actively contribute to organizational goals. Consultant: Establish work-life balance boundaries, prioritize self-care, continuously learn and adapt, and cultivate a supportive network.

Funcionários internos se beneficiam de alianças com stakeholders, aliviando a carga em programas como privacidade. Essas parcerias promovem suporte mútuo e distribuição de responsabilidades. Consultores, contudo, enfrentam maiores responsabilidades, com sua performance afetando diretamente suas compensações e oportunidades. Isso contrasta a segurança de um ambiente corporativo colaborativo com a independência e riscos da consultoria.

1. Structured Work Hours: Typically follows a regular 9-to-5 schedule. More predictable daily routine with less fluctuation in working hours. 2. Consistency: A steady stream of work that tends to be more predictable. Less likelihood of sudden work surges compared to project-based work. 3. Company Benefits: Access to employee benefits such as paid time off (PTO), health insurance, and wellness programs. Policies for work-from-home and flexible hours may be available. 4. Support System: Being part of a team can mean better distribution of workload. Support from other departments can alleviate some responsibilities. 5. Long-Term Projects: Involvement in long-term strategic projects can lead to a more balanced workload.

As an in-house data privacy officer, work-life balance may lean towards more predictable hours, fostering a stable routine and potentially allowing for better separation between work and personal life. However, there might be occasions requiring overtime or urgent situations impacting the balance. consultants often enjoy more flexibility in their schedules, which can lead to a better work-life balance. They can adjust their workload and take on projects that align with their preferred schedule. Yet, this flexibility might also mean irregular hours, juggling multiple clients, and occasionally facing tight deadlines that could affect personal time.

Having spent two decade bouncing between in-house and consulting, I can tell you that both can give you a sense of impact and satisfaction, but in different ways. Consultants, especially if they bring deep experience or insights from adjacent industries, can bring a fresh perspective that sometimes enables the kind of change that can have a positive impact. But there's a different kind of satisfaction watching a program evolve over time, something a consultant seldom gets to see unless they cultivate a long-term relationship with a client organization. Success as either a consultant or in-house can be gratifying, it just depends on whether you appreciate quick wins or long-term positive evolution.

An in-house Privacy Officer's impact is often more profound than a consultant's due to their intimate knowledge of the organization and long-term involvement. They can effect change from within, influence organizational culture around privacy, and build lasting, robust policies that reflect the organization's unique needs. They're more capable of fostering a privacy-centric mindset among employees and can quickly respond to privacy-related incidents. While consultants bring external insights, the in-house officer's deep, contextual understanding of the organization can lead to more effective and sustainable privacy practices, contributing to a greater overall impact.

Independentemente da duração de sua estadia em uma empresa, seja de 1, 2, 5 ou até 10 anos, toda jornada profissional tem um início, meio e fim. Na minha opinião, o aspecto mais gratificante é a capacidade de olhar para trás, ano após ano, e reconhecer as diferenças significativas que você fez dentro da organização. Essas contribuições têm um valor duradouro; mesmo após a sua partida, os feitos e as mudanças que você implementou continuam a ser um legado valorizado e lembrado pela empresa.

The DPO has a broader range of responsibilities, including regulatory compliance, incident response, and stakeholder engagement, whereas the Data Privacy Consultant primarily focuses on advisory and consulting services.

In my experience working as an in-house data privacy officer you have the ability to influence product road maps, the privacy narrative for the organization and build relationships. As a consultant you can also have this type of impact if you continue to provide value to your clients and build those long term relationships, however you may have less visibility across the company which may limit one's ability to influence products over the long haul.

WTF is a ‘data privacy officer’? The statutory role of DATA PROTECTION OFFICER encompasses way more than ‘privacy’. Why are all these ‘collaborative article’ questions so utterly crap?

The worst things about working in an in-house role is the office politics that get in the way of focusing on the task at hand and getting the job done. Not only does it distract you from delivering your best work but can also lead to unnecessary stress. The best thing about working in house is that you get to see things through and appreciate the impact you are making. The worst thing about being a consultant is that to be effective you have to spend most of your energy getting buy in instead of focusing on the solutions. The thing I love most about working as a consultant is that you get exposed to a wide range of projects, challenges and industry which really gives you the edge!

There is scope for both in-house and consultants as experts in data privacy. The in-house person brings an understanding of the organization and ensures solutions/advice are practical from a business perspective. At the same time, the external consultant can provide support for peaks in workload plus a fresh outside-in perspective as they bring in experience from other organizations.

With global privacy laws becoming increasingly stringent, organizations face significant risks and penalties for non-compliance. It's crucial for organizations to invest in an in-house Privacy Officer, whose expertise can safeguard the organization across all facets, including engineering, security, contracts, project management, and HR. This role is pivotal, as privacy permeates all business aspects. The Privacy Officer can drive the adoption of privacy-centric practices, ensuring the organization's processes align with privacy laws, mitigating risks, and fostering trust with customers and stakeholders.

I have been lucky enough to do both. Inhouse can (and has) pose the issues most people here have already alluded to - namely having the independence and authority to deliver independent advice, guidance, recommendations and decisions, right to the top of the tree, but more importantly have them heard, read, and implemented. Privacy culture, so critical in any business can sometimes be difficult to engender when you are already "one of team". As a consultant, by default the business is paying for your specific support and advice, and (maybe somewhat unfairly) therefore it can carry more credence and a direct line to board buy in. Ideally a consultant will work closely with privacy champion(s) in any business to gain additional insight.