Comment évaluez-vous les nouvelles idées de construction?

To research, analyze & implement new construction ideas in Live project/running project or new fresh project to be started a view shall be given to "ROBOT". Now all people reading this would think what "ROBOT" is or would simply think that oh its ROBOT or working like "Robot". It is R-Resources, O-Objective, B-Budget, O-Obligations and lastly T-Timeline. Trust me if any project manager or engineer would work on these topics for an ongoing project or new fresh project. The goal of the project will be easily & smoothly achieved.

In my years working in construction, when evaluating new ideas, I always start by assessing their feasibility. Practicality in terms of cost, materials, and structural integrity is paramount. Next, I liaise with architects and engineers to understand any technical implications. I often run pilot tests or create smaller prototypes if possible. Sustainability is another key metric; I look at how the idea fits within current environmental and efficiency standards. Furthermore, I always consider the end-user, seeking feedback on design and functionality. Lastly, keeping abreast of industry trends and regulations ensures the idea is not just innovative, but also market-ready and compliant.

it is a human instinct to go for the easy way to finish a task. any new idea should be welcomed in any situation, you might find the solution to your long-lasting problem. In my experience not every task you are familiar with and sometimes following method statement word to word do not help, and then ideas from you or your team came in, if the ideas are feasible, economic, safe and easy to implement we should give it a chance

not every idea is feasible, and we should value our teams' opinions by considering them. what is the construction manager's part is to feasibility check, risk analysis, cost analysis, and any feasibility we should check. i my self in my early career days, I was given the opportunity, and my ideas were welcomed helped me and motivated me to think about solutions and better ways to do a certain job.

a person, if given a task, would prefer to finish the task in less time but he wouldn't put his life on the line and would choose the cheaper resources. the same phenomenon is used in construction management, we do a feasibility check for any task that is to be carried out and we choose the best way to do that job. preference is set as per the client/stakeholder's requirements. e.g. shifting a pile of cement pack to roof top is possible by man labor or by crane but how to choose for either option is called feasibility check. you can save equipment costs by choosing man labor but you are spending more man hours while you same time by choosing the equipment

One of the current issues in Construction and the World in General is the idea that we need to be making innovations for the sake of being innovative. Many times, this notion is tied to individual performance/goals and ends up driving behavior. This leads to group think within the project team and many times results in a blind spot regarding the actual value (lack of value) of the innovation. Someone needs to be in a position to point out "the Emperor Has No Clothes" if the innovation is not achieving its promise.