🚨 Litigant Misconduct in Industrial Disputes – A Wake-Up Call from Delhi High Court! 🚨 The Delhi High Court has strongly condemned the misuse of judicial proceedings to delay industrial dispute cases, especially where there is an extreme disparity in resources between litigants. 💼⚖️ In a recent case involving RB Seth Jessa Ram Hospital, Justice Girish Kathpalia imposed a ₹20,000 penalty on the hospital management for prolonging a dispute pending since 2009. The Court emphasized that such tactics, aimed at frustrating the opposing party, must be firmly deprecated. The key takeaways from this ruling: The Tribunal granted reasonable allowances but declined repeated, unjustified requests for adjournments. The Court observed that delaying tactics not only waste judicial time but also harass witnesses, highlighting how such behavior disrupts the justice process. Justice Kathpalia praised the Tribunal's balanced approach and affirmed that penalties should deter such conduct. 🔑 Key Message: Misuse of legal resources to drag proceedings is not just unfair—it's an act of harassment. Courts are stepping up to ensure timely justice, especially in cases involving resource disparities. #JusticeForAll #IndustrialDisputes #LegalUpdate #DelhiHighCourt #LitigationMisconduct #AdvocacyMatters #JusticePrevails #LawAndOrder #ProfessionalConduct
ADVOMART
Legal Services
Gurgaon, Haryana 435 followers
Empowering You with Expert Legal Solutions at Your Fingertips.
About us
Welcome to Advomart, where innovation meets legal expertise to create a transformative platform for connecting individuals, law students, and legal professionals. Our goal is to redefine the way legal services and opportunities are accessed, making the process more efficient, accessible, and user-friendly. Our mission is to create the world’s first 'Rapid Justice Delivery Ecosystem' where the focus is on empowering people with the knowledge and resources they need to navigate their legal affairs effectively. We aim to create “an accessible justice system” by ensuring that justice is delivered to those in need without any delay. Our Vision is to revolutionize legal services, ensuring justice is delivered without barriers or delays, Every citizen has right to legal aid and speedy justice. We build a bond of trust with those in need by providing a fair and timely justice delivery system.
- Website
-
advomart.in
External link for ADVOMART
- Industry
- Legal Services
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Gurgaon, Haryana
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2024
- Specialties
- advomart, Business Law, Personal Injury, Employment Law, Intern provider, legal consulting, and work for justice
Locations
-
Primary
B304, Block B, Greenwood City, Sector 45
Gurgaon, Haryana 122003, IN
Employees at ADVOMART
Updates
-
🚨 Supreme Court on Specific Performance Suit: Key Observations 🚨 The Supreme Court has clarified that when possession of immovable property is implicitly transferred upon executing a sale deed, a separate suit for possession is not necessary under Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA). 👉 The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan emphasized: If possession is explicitly part of the agreement, no separate relief for possession is required. However, when possession involves a third party, a specific claim for possession is necessary. Citing Babu Lal v. Hazari Lal Kishori Lal & Others (1982), the Court highlighted that specific performance suits inherently address transfer of possession unless a third party holds possession. 💡 Key Takeaways: Agreements that implicitly involve transfer of possession align with Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Absence of a specific prayer for possession does not alter the nature of such suits. This judgment reiterates the interplay between Sections 22 & 28 of the SRA and Section 55 of the Transfer of Property Act. It ensures streamlined legal processes for specific performance claims. #SupremeCourt #SpecificPerformance #LegalUpdate #PropertyLaw #SpecificReliefAct #Judgment #LawyersCommunity #LegalInsights
-
🚨 Rajasthan High Court on Reservation and Bonus Marks: Key Judgment 🚨 The Rajasthan High Court recently dismissed a petition by a disabled candidate seeking bonus marks and reservation for the post of Female Nurse. The petitioner, who has 61% polio in both legs, was deemed ineligible based on guidelines that permit reservation only for single-leg disabilities. Key Points from the Judgment: 👉 Temporary Service During COVID-19 Not a Basis for Equity: The petitioner’s temporary service during the pandemic could not justify granting bonus marks or reservation against prescribed guidelines. 👉 No Reverse Discrimination: Justice Arun Monga emphasized that allowing the claim would lead to reverse discrimination against other similarly disqualified candidates. 👉 Guidelines Govern Eligibility: The court referred to the Gazette Notification (January 7, 2021), which outlined the specific disabilities eligible for reservation, reaffirming that dual-leg disabilities were not included. 👉 No Challenge to Guidelines: The petitioner did not challenge the advertisement or the guidelines specifying eligible disabilities, further solidifying the Court's decision. Outcome: The petition was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of adhering to established eligibility criteria and ensuring fairness for all candidates. #RajasthanHighCourt #DisabilityRights #COVID19 #NursingCareers #LegalUpdate #InclusionAndEquity
-
Telangana High Court Grants Interim Protection to BRS MLA T. Harish Rao in Alleged Phone Tapping Case The Telangana High Court has directed the police not to arrest BRS MLA T. Harish Rao in connection with an alleged phone-tapping case involving BSP politician and social worker Gadhagoni Chakradhar Goud. Justice K. Lakshman, while hearing Rao's plea to quash the FIR, emphasized that the MLA must cooperate with the investigation. Key Highlights: Rao faces charges under IPC Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 386 (extortion), 409 (criminal breach of trust), and 506 (criminal intimidation), along with Section 66 of the IT Act. The High Court ruled that Rao should not be arrested until December 30, 2024, but the investigation will continue. Allegations stem from claims of phone tapping and threats received by Goud after joining BSP in 2023. The case sheds light on concerns about the alleged misuse of state machinery for political gain. Rao’s counsel argued that the complaint was politically motivated, while the State contended that the investigation was in its early stages. Legal Perspective: The Court observed that the delay in filing the complaint and the lack of prima facie evidence for certain charges justified interim protection for the MLA, without requiring custodial interrogation. The matter will be heard further on December 30, 2024. #LegalNews #TelanganaHighCourt #BRSLaw #PhoneTappingCase #PoliticalControversy #Justice
-
📢 Convict Without 'Permanent Residential Address In Delhi' Not Barred From Getting Furlough: High Court! The Delhi High Court has made a significant ruling affirming that the absence of a permanent residential address in Delhi cannot be a ground to deny furlough to a convict. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized that Delhi Prison Rules do not stipulate that a convict must have a "permanent residential address in Delhi" to qualify for furlough. The Court clarified that: 🔹 Furlough can be granted if the convict's address—whether permanent or temporary—has been duly verified, even if it is in another state. 🔹 The rule requires a convict to provide the “proposed address” where they wish to stay, not necessarily a permanent one. The judgment warns against rigid interpretations of welfare-oriented provisions, highlighting the risks of overlooking the rehabilitative intent behind furlough and parole. This ruling was made while granting a 3-week furlough to a convict serving life imprisonment since 2008. The convict’s application had been previously rejected solely because of the lack of a permanent address in Delhi. Justice Sharma concluded that furlough is both a reward for commendable behavior and a tool to strengthen familial and social bonds, crucial for prisoner rehabilitation. This empathetic approach sends a powerful message about upholding justice, fairness, and the spirit of reformative measures. #LegalUpdate #JusticeForAll #Furlough #HighCourt #DelhiPrisonRules #HumanRights #PrisonReforms #Advocacy #Empathy #SocialJustice
-
🚨 Karnataka High Court Issues Notice on CM Siddaramaiah's Appeal in MUDA Case 🚨 The Karnataka High Court, on December 5, issued notices to the state government and others regarding Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's appeal challenging the single judge’s decision to uphold Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot's sanction for investigating the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam. Key Highlights: 📝 CM Siddaramaiah argued that Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act was violated and improperly upheld, emphasizing the absence of procedural filters, such as approval by a police officer, before the Governor's sanction. 📜 Constitutional Questions Raised: Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi emphasized the broader constitutional implications, including the interpretation of Section 17A, the Governor's authority, and the balance between the Governor's discretion and cabinet advice. ⚖️ Notice Issued: A division bench led by Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria set January 25, 2025, as the returnable date. Appeals from other parties, including landowner Devaraju, were also acknowledged, as they contest the Governor’s sanction and the transfer of the MUDA case to the CBI. 🔍 Background: Siddaramaiah’s petition alleges that the sanction order bypassed statutory mandates and constitutional principles, including Article 163, which requires the Governor to act on the council of ministers' advice. The CM contends the move is politically motivated to destabilize the Karnataka government. This case has far-reaching implications for governance, constitutional law, and corruption inquiries in India. Stay tuned for further developments! #KarnatakaHighCourt #Siddaramaiah #MUDA #GovernorSanction #PreventionOfCorruptionAct #ConstitutionalLaw #LegalUpdates #JusticeInProgress
-
🚨 Litigant Seeking To Condone Delay Must Explain Why Appeal Was Not Filed From Day One Within Limitation Period 🚨 📜 The Supreme Court of India has clarified an important principle regarding condonation of delay in appeals. The Court ruled that litigants seeking condonation must explain not just the delay after the limitation period ended but also why the appeal was not filed within the limitation period itself. ⚖️ While the Court acknowledged that litigants have the right to file appeals up to the last day of the limitation period, they emphasized that any lapse beyond this period requires a clear and specific explanation rooted in events or circumstances that occurred within the limitation period. This observation came as the Court, with a bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan, dismissed an appeal by the State of Madhya Pradesh seeking to condone a delay of over 5 years in filing a second appeal. 🔍 Referencing Ajit Singh Thakur Singh and Another v. State of Gujarat, the Court highlighted: A plea for condonation must establish that some event or circumstance during the limitation period prevented the filing of the appeal. Any delays caused by events after the limitation expired are not sufficient cause for condonation. This decision reinforces the responsibility of litigants to act promptly within the stipulated period, ensuring judicial efficiency and upholding procedural discipline. #SupremeCourt #CondonationOfDelay #Litigation #LegalUpdates #Justice #ProceduralLaw
-
🌾 Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole to Murder Convict for Agricultural Responsibilities The Karnataka High Court has shown a compassionate approach, granting 90 days of parole to a murder convict, Chandra, to oversee agricultural activities on his father’s land. 🌾 ⚖️ Key Details: ✅ Justice Hemant Chandangoudar noted that the petitioner, serving a life sentence for over 11 years, had never been released on parole before. ✅ The convict argued that there was no male member available to manage the agricultural work, which required his oversight. ✅ The parole comes with conditions: No involvement in unlawful activities. Weekly attendance marking with the jurisdictional police. This decision highlights a balance between ensuring justice and addressing humanitarian considerations. #KarnatakaHighCourt #LegalUpdates #Parole #Agriculture #HumanitarianLaw
-
📢 Supreme Court Highlights the Importance of Readiness & Willingness in Specific Performance Cases The Supreme Court recently upheld a High Court ruling that denied specific relief to a plaintiff due to the failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract. 🛑 Key Takeaways: ✅ The plaintiff must not only claim readiness and willingness but must also present oral and documentary evidence to show financial capacity and adherence to contract terms. ✅ Readiness refers to the financial ability to perform, while willingness relates to the plaintiff’s conduct. ✅ Both elements are essential to securing a decree for specific performance. In this case, the plaintiff sought specific performance of a sale agreement, alleging the respondent failed to uphold the contract after receiving earnest money. The Trial Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the High Court reversed the decision, citing a lack of proof on the plaintiff's part. The Supreme Court affirmed this view, emphasizing the necessity of evidentiary support. #SupremeCourt #LegalUpdates #ContractLaw #SpecificPerformance #ReadinessAndWillingness #LegalInsights
-
🌟 We're Hiring: Legal Telecaller 🌟 Join Advomart in building a 'Rapid Justice Delivery Ecosystem'! Are you passionate about making legal services accessible and user-friendly? Advomart is on a mission to connect individuals, law students, and legal professionals to ensure justice is delivered promptly and without barriers. 💼 Role: Legal Telecaller 📍 Location: Gurugram (with some remote flexibility) 🕒 Type: Full-Time 💸 Stipend: up to 10,000/- Key Responsibilities: Making outbound calls to clients and providing legal assistance. Addressing client inquiries and maintaining detailed client records. Scheduling appointments and facilitating communication with legal professionals. What We’re Looking For: Exceptional communication and interpersonal skills. Strong understanding of legal terminology and processes. Experience in customer service or call center roles. Ability to multitask and work independently. Familiarity with legal databases and research tools. Fluency in multiple languages is a bonus. Bachelor’s degree in Law or a related field. 🔗 Apply Now: Fill out this form to be considered: https://lnkd.in/g_ES_UBh Deadline: 6th December, 2024, till 6:00 PM. 📢 Spread the word or tag someone who might be interested! Let’s work together to make legal services more accessible. #Hiring #LegalJobs #Advomart #LegalTelecaller #JoinUs