🌾 Karnataka High Court Grants 90-Day Parole to Murder Convict for Agricultural Responsibilities The Karnataka High Court has shown a compassionate approach, granting 90 days of parole to a murder convict, Chandra, to oversee agricultural activities on his father’s land. 🌾 ⚖️ Key Details: ✅ Justice Hemant Chandangoudar noted that the petitioner, serving a life sentence for over 11 years, had never been released on parole before. ✅ The convict argued that there was no male member available to manage the agricultural work, which required his oversight. ✅ The parole comes with conditions: No involvement in unlawful activities. Weekly attendance marking with the jurisdictional police. This decision highlights a balance between ensuring justice and addressing humanitarian considerations. #KarnatakaHighCourt #LegalUpdates #Parole #Agriculture #HumanitarianLaw
ADVOMART
Legal Services
Gurgaon, Haryana 426 followers
Empowering You with Expert Legal Solutions at Your Fingertips.
About us
Welcome to Advomart, where innovation meets legal expertise to create a transformative platform for connecting individuals, law students, and legal professionals. Our goal is to redefine the way legal services and opportunities are accessed, making the process more efficient, accessible, and user-friendly. Our mission is to create the world’s first 'Rapid Justice Delivery Ecosystem' where the focus is on empowering people with the knowledge and resources they need to navigate their legal affairs effectively. We aim to create “an accessible justice system” by ensuring that justice is delivered to those in need without any delay. Our Vision is to revolutionize legal services, ensuring justice is delivered without barriers or delays, Every citizen has right to legal aid and speedy justice. We build a bond of trust with those in need by providing a fair and timely justice delivery system.
- Website
-
advomart.in
External link for ADVOMART
- Industry
- Legal Services
- Company size
- 11-50 employees
- Headquarters
- Gurgaon, Haryana
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2024
- Specialties
- advomart, Business Law, Personal Injury, Employment Law, Intern provider, legal consulting, and work for justice
Locations
-
Primary
B304, Block B, Greenwood City, Sector 45
Gurgaon, Haryana 122003, IN
Employees at ADVOMART
Updates
-
📢 Supreme Court Highlights the Importance of Readiness & Willingness in Specific Performance Cases The Supreme Court recently upheld a High Court ruling that denied specific relief to a plaintiff due to the failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract. 🛑 Key Takeaways: ✅ The plaintiff must not only claim readiness and willingness but must also present oral and documentary evidence to show financial capacity and adherence to contract terms. ✅ Readiness refers to the financial ability to perform, while willingness relates to the plaintiff’s conduct. ✅ Both elements are essential to securing a decree for specific performance. In this case, the plaintiff sought specific performance of a sale agreement, alleging the respondent failed to uphold the contract after receiving earnest money. The Trial Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the High Court reversed the decision, citing a lack of proof on the plaintiff's part. The Supreme Court affirmed this view, emphasizing the necessity of evidentiary support. #SupremeCourt #LegalUpdates #ContractLaw #SpecificPerformance #ReadinessAndWillingness #LegalInsights
-
🌟 We're Hiring: Legal Telecaller 🌟 Join Advomart in building a 'Rapid Justice Delivery Ecosystem'! Are you passionate about making legal services accessible and user-friendly? Advomart is on a mission to connect individuals, law students, and legal professionals to ensure justice is delivered promptly and without barriers. 💼 Role: Legal Telecaller 📍 Location: Gurugram (with some remote flexibility) 🕒 Type: Full-Time 💸 Stipend: up to 10,000/- Key Responsibilities: Making outbound calls to clients and providing legal assistance. Addressing client inquiries and maintaining detailed client records. Scheduling appointments and facilitating communication with legal professionals. What We’re Looking For: Exceptional communication and interpersonal skills. Strong understanding of legal terminology and processes. Experience in customer service or call center roles. Ability to multitask and work independently. Familiarity with legal databases and research tools. Fluency in multiple languages is a bonus. Bachelor’s degree in Law or a related field. 🔗 Apply Now: Fill out this form to be considered: https://lnkd.in/g_ES_UBh Deadline: 6th December, 2024, till 6:00 PM. 📢 Spread the word or tag someone who might be interested! Let’s work together to make legal services more accessible. #Hiring #LegalJobs #Advomart #LegalTelecaller #JoinUs
-
🌟 Celebrating National Advocates Day with Advomart! 🌟 On this special day, we honor the dedication, courage, and integrity of all advocates who tirelessly work to uphold justice and empower the voices of those in need. At Advomart, we strive to complement the efforts of legal professionals by creating a Rapid Justice Delivery Ecosystem, making legal services accessible, affordable, and efficient for everyone. Today, let’s recognize the pivotal role advocates play in shaping a fair and equitable society. Your passion for justice inspires us to continue innovating for a brighter future. 💼 Empowering Advocates, Empowering Justice. #NationalAdvocatesDay #Advomart #LegalEmpowerment #JusticeForAll #AdvocateLife #LegalSupport #RapidJusticeDelivery
-
🚨 Kerala High Court: No Case of Defamation for Comments on Banned Organizations like PFI The Kerala High Court has clarified that defamation cases cannot be made for remarks on banned organizations such as the Popular Front of India (PFI). Justice PV Kunhikrishnan highlighted that since the PFI was declared an "unlawful association" by the Central government in September 2022, it no longer holds legal entity status under Section 499 of the IPC, which defines defamation. 📜 Key Observations: Publications about the PFI cannot be considered defamatory as the group is a banned association without legal recognition. Defamation laws apply to a "person," and the PFI, being banned, no longer qualifies under this definition. 📰 The case arose from a defamation complaint by CP Mohammed Basheer, PFI's General Secretary, against Organiser, a publication that linked PFI to various unlawful activities. The Court found that the article merely reiterated publicly available information and quashed the defamation complaint. The Court's decision underscores the limits of defamation claims against entities deemed unlawful by the law. #KeralaHighCourt #DefamationLaw #PFIBan #LegalNews #JudiciaryUpdates
-
Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Mathura Idgah Dispute on December 9 The Supreme Court has expressed a prima facie view that the Shahi Masjid Idgah management committee should have appealed the Allahabad High Court single judge's order before a division bench, rather than approaching the SC directly. The case revolves around the August 1 decision, where the HC single judge declared 15 suits filed by Hindu parties—claiming the Idgah premises as the birthplace of Sri Krishna—maintainable. The court also ordered these suits to be clubbed for a joint trial. The Idgah committee argued the claims were barred by the Places of Worship Act, 1991, and a decades-old community agreement, but these pleas were rejected. During the hearing, CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar suggested intra-court appeals could be a better initial approach. However, given the historical intricacies raised by the Idgah committee, the bench scheduled detailed arguments for December 9. #SupremeCourt #MathuraIdgahCase #LegalUpdate #SriKrishnaJanmabhoomi #IndianJudiciary #PlacesOfWorshipAct
-
Refusal to Marry Doesn't Amount to Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has ruled that mere refusal to marry does not constitute abetment of suicide under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case involved a man accused of cheating and abetment to suicide after a woman consumed poison following his refusal to marry her. The Court, however, found no evidence that the accused instigated or provoked the woman to take such a step. The Bench clarified: "Even assuming there was love between the parties, it is only a case of a broken relationship, which by itself does not amount to abetment of suicide. The refusal to marry is not a positive act with the intention to incite the crime." This ruling reaffirms the need for direct evidence to prove intent and underscores the importance of a fair trial. #SupremeCourt #LegalUpdate #AbetmentToSuicide #IndianPenalCode #RefusalToMarry #Justice
-
🚨 Sambhal Case Update: Supreme Court Halts Proceedings to Uphold 'Peace and Harmony' In a significant development today (29 November), the Supreme Court halted proceedings in the Sambhal Shahi Jama Masjid case, stressing the importance of maintaining communal harmony. 🔹 Key Highlights: The trial court in Sambhal has been directed not to proceed with the suit concerning the Shahi Jama Masjid at Chandausi. The Supreme Court specified that the Advocate Commissioner's survey report will remain sealed until further orders. The Allahabad High Court will hear the Masjid Committee's plea against the survey order under Article 227 of the Constitution, to be listed within three working days. The case arises from claims that the mosque was constructed by demolishing a temple in 1526 during Mughal rule. The Masjid Committee has argued that the trial court's ex-parte order for a survey risks inflaming communal tensions and violates the Places of Worship Act, which protects religious structures as they existed on 15 August 1947. Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna emphasized, "Peace and harmony have to be maintained. We have to be absolutely neutral and ensure nothing wrong is done." 🔸 Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the Masjid Committee, highlighted the broader implications of such actions, stating: "This pattern inflames passions, creating law and order problems." 🔸 Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, for the respondents, defended the necessity of the survey, but the Supreme Court has paused trial court action until the High Court addresses the petition. This case underscores the delicate balance between legal claims and preserving communal harmony, with significant implications for secular values. #SambhalCase #SupremeCourt #CommunalHarmony #PlacesOfWorshipAct #LegalNews #JusticeForAll #IndiaUpdates #PeaceAndHarmony
-
UP Police Need to Be Sensitised: Supreme Court on Criminal Cases Over Civil Issues The Supreme Court has expressed concern over the Uttar Pradesh Police registering criminal cases in matters that are essentially civil in nature, particularly against gangster Anurag Dubey. "You tell your DGP we can pass strong orders. Police are assuming the powers of civil courts; they need to be sensitised," remarked the Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan. The Court emphasized the need for fair investigations and extended interim protection to Dubey, stressing that he cannot be taken into custody without its permission. This calls for introspection on the role of police forces in handling civil disputes. Sensitisation is the need of the hour. #SupremeCourt #UPPolice #CivilMatters #Judiciary #LawAndOrder #LegalAwareness #JusticeForAll #IndiaLaw
-
🚨 Supreme Court Issues Notice to Yasin Malik on CBI Plea Seeking Transfer of Cases to Delhi The Supreme Court has directed separatist leader Yasin Malik to respond by December 14 to the CBI’s petition for transferring two cases against him from Jammu to Delhi. The cases involve: 1️⃣ The killing of four IAF personnel. 2️⃣ The 1989 abduction of Rubaiya Sayeed, daughter of former J&K Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed. The CBI cited security risks in moving Malik from Tihar Jail to Jammu. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Bench about a fully-equipped courtroom in Tihar with videoconference facilities, suggesting it could be used for cross-examination instead. Previously, the Apex Court had stayed the Jammu trial court’s order directing Malik’s physical appearance in 2023. However, Malik’s presence in the Supreme Court in July led to concerns over security lapses, flagged by SG Mehta. Separately, Malik has petitioned the Delhi High Court to allow physical production in court and access to medical treatment at AIIMS, challenging restrictions under Section 268 CrPC. #SupremeCourt #YasinMalik #CBI #LegalUpdates #DelhiCourt #Justice