Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 104
Results 1 - 10 of 104.
Search took: 0.034 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Astrophysical Journal; v. 176(1); p. L23-L25
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields; v. 7(6); p. 1825-1829
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Allen, L. E.; Silva, M. K.
Environmental Evaluation Group (United States)2003
Environmental Evaluation Group (United States)2003
AbstractAbstract
[en] The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), a repository for defense transuranic (TRU) waste, was built and is operated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The WIPP Land Withdrawal Act (LWA) required initial certification of compliance of the WIPP by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In addition, a recertification decision is required by the LWA every five years, dated from the initial receipt of TRU waste. The first TRU waste shipment arrived at the WIPP on March 26, 1999, and therefore the first recertification application is due from DOE to EPA by March 25, 2004. The Environmental Evaluation Group (EEG) provides technical oversight of the WIPP project on behalf of the State of New Mexico. The EEG considers the first recertification as a precedent setting event. Therefore, the EEG began the identification of recertification issues immediately following the initial certification decision. These issues have evolved since that time, based on discussions with the DOE and EEG's understanding of DOE's ongoing research. Performance assessment is required by the EPA certification and its results are needed to determine whether the facility remains in compliance at the time of the recertification application. The DOE must submit periodic change reports to the EPA which summarize activities and conditions that differ from the compliance application. Also, the EPA may request additional information from the DOE that may pertain to continued compliance. These changes and new information must be considered for recertification performance assessment
Primary Subject
Source
25 Feb 2003; 18 p; WM Symposia, Inc; Waste Management 2003 Symposium; Tucson, AZ (United States); 23-27 Feb 2003; Available from PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/825689-sAhkOe/native/
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Connor, J.W.; Tang, W.M.; Allen, L.
Princeton Univ., NJ (USA). Plasma Physics Lab1984
Princeton Univ., NJ (USA). Plasma Physics Lab1984
AbstractAbstract
[en] The finite Larmor radius modification of the Suydam criterion involves a competition between stabilizing finite Larmor radius effects and destabilizing curvature. In the case of the toroidal calculation, corresponding to the Mercier criterion, ballooning effects from regions of unfavorable curvature must be taken into account. In the case of a model equilibrium, valid near the magnetic axis, a complete solution is obtained. Results indicate that the amount of finite Larmor radius stabilization needed to overcome the effects of unfavorable average curvature increases as a function of the toroidal ballooning parameter
Primary Subject
Source
Apr 1984; 16 p; Available from NTIS, PC A02/MF A01 as DE84010934
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
McCrory, E.; Allen, L.; Popovic, M.; Schmidt, C.W.
Fermi National Accelerator Lab., Batavia, IL (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (United States)1996
Fermi National Accelerator Lab., Batavia, IL (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (United States)1996
AbstractAbstract
[en] The measurements which characterize the longitudinal emittance of the Fermilab 400 MeV Linac beam are presented. These measurements are made by determining the momentum spread and the bunch length of the beam using wall-current monitors, bunch length detectors and a spectrometer
Primary Subject
Source
Sep 1996; 5 p; 18. international linac conference; Geneva (Switzerland); 26-30 Aug 1996; CONF-9608123--43; CONTRACT AC02-76CH03000; Also available from OSTI as DE96050559; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Stephen Mitchen; Allen L. Johnson; John W. Farley
National Security Technologies, LLC (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE - National Nuclear Security Administration NNSA (United States)2006
National Security Technologies, LLC (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE - National Nuclear Security Administration NNSA (United States)2006
AbstractAbstract
[en] Pulsed power machines capable of producing tremendous energy face various diagnostic and characterizing challenges. Such devices, which may produce 10 - 100MAs, have traditionally relied on Faraday rotation and Rogowski coil technology for time-varying current measurements. Faraday rotation requires a host of costly optical components, including fibers, polarizers, retarders, lasers, and detectors, as well as setup, alignment, and time-consuming post-processing to unwrap the time-dependent current signal. Rogowski coils face potential problems such as physical distortion to the sensor itself due to the tremendous strain caused by magnetically induced pressures, which is proportional to the magnetic field squared (B2). Electrical breakdown in the intense field region is also a major concern. Other related challenges include, but are not limited to, bandwidth and inductance limitations and susceptibility issues related to electrical magnetic interference (EMI)
Primary Subject
Source
30 Nov 2006; 10 p; 2006 International Megagauss Conference; Santa Fe, NM (United States); 5-10 Nov 2006; AC52-06NA25946; Also available from OSTI as DE00914428; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/914428-V9bSe8/
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Allen L. Robinson; Spyros N. Pandis; Cliff I. Davidson
National Energy Technology Lab., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); National Energy Technology Lab., Morgantown, WV (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2002
National Energy Technology Lab., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); National Energy Technology Lab., Morgantown, WV (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2002
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report describes the technical progress made on the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) during the period of August 2001 through January of 2002. The major activity during this project period was the continuation of the ambient monitoring effort. Work also progressed on organizing the upcoming source characterization effort, and there was continued development of several three-dimensional air quality models. The first PAQS data analysis workshop for the project was held at Carnegie Mellon in December 2001. Two new instruments were added to site during this project period: a single particle mass spectrometer and an in situ VOC instrument. The single particle mass spectrometer has been deployed since the middle of September and has collected more than 150 days of data. The VOC instrument was only deployed during the intensive sampling period. Several instruments experienced operational issues during this project period. The overall data recovery rate for the project has been high
Primary Subject
Source
1 Mar 2002; 38 p; FC26-01NT41017; Available from OSTI as DE00794362
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Allen L. Robinson; Spyros N. Pandis; Cliff I. Davidson
National Energy Technology Lab., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); National Energy Technology Lab., Morgantown, WV (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2001
National Energy Technology Lab., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); National Energy Technology Lab., Morgantown, WV (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2001
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report describes the technical progress made on the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study during the period of February through July of 2001. The major effort during this period involved the set-up and initiation of the ambient monitoring campaign. The central sampling station next to the Carnegie Mellon University in Scheleny Park was completed. Baseline measurements began on June 1, 2001, and the first intensive sampling period occurred between June 30, 2001 and August 3, 2001. Data were collected at both the central site and a set of satellite sites surrounding Pittsburgh. Preliminary examination of the data has been initiated. This report presents results of PM-2.5 mass and chemical composition measured on a 24-hr basis for the July intensive period. The average PM-2.5 concentration at the central monitoring site for the July intensive was 23(micro)g/m(sup 3). The variation in PM-2.5 levels indicates that a wide range of atmospheric conditions occurred during the month of July, and, therefore, the data will be useful for evaluating the performance of air quality models over a range of conditions. During July, the major chemical components of the PM-2.5 mass are sulfate and organic material. Elemental carbon and nitrate only contribute a small part of the PM-2.5 mass on a 24-hr average basis. Comparing the measured PM-2.5 mass and the sum of the chemical components indicates problems with the mass balance. The total measured mass tends to be larger than the sum of the major chemical components at high PM levels, and smaller than the sum of the components at low PM levels. There are many potential explanations for the observed discrepancies; however, preliminary data suggests that water may be the source of the mass balance discrepancy at high PM levels
Primary Subject
Source
1 Sep 2001; 12 p; FC26-01NT41017; Available from OSTI as DE00794361
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Duran, Felicia A.; Camp, Allen L.; Apostolakis, G.; Golay, M.
Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2000
Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia National Labs., Livermore, CA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2000
AbstractAbstract
No abstract available
Primary Subject
Source
6 Jul 2000; 8 p; PSAM 5: International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management; Osaka (Japan); 27 Nov - 1 Dec 2000; AC04-94AL85000; Also available from OSTI as DE00760797; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/760797-hy11wa/webviewable/
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] This paper summarizes the findings from an effort addressing the use of ultrasonic attenuation as a suitable parameter for nondestructive determination of irradiation embrittlement in reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels. The materials examined in this study include one heat of RPV steel that was heat treated to induce changes in its fracture toughness, several heats of RPV steel irradiated to assess neutron embrittlement changes in fracture toughness, and a matrix of RPV steels (in the unirradiated condition) with a range of as-fabricated fracture toughness levels. The following observations can be made. -) The results indicate that ultrasonic attenuation is generally able to identify differences in responses for samples with different toughness levels, although in some cases the differences in ultrasonic responses are small. -) Plate and weld materials provide different trends of attenuation changes with changes in material toughness. -) For the single forging studied in 2 irradiated conditions, the attenuation measurements provided mixed results. -) Differences in fracture toughness that arise from damage of a microstructure result in more different responses in ultrasonic attenuation than differences in fracture toughness that arise from as-fabricated differences in microstructure
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
The ASME Foundation, Inc., Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 (United States); 924 p; ISBN 0-7918-4687-3; ; 2004; p. 29-38; 12. international conference on nuclear engineering - ICONE 12; Arlington - Virginia (United States); 25-29 Apr 2004; 9 refs.
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | 3 | Next |