Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 13
Results 1 - 10 of 13.
Search took: 0.023 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
MacArthur, D.
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1995
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1995
AbstractAbstract
[en] Alpha detectors based on the long-range alpha detection (LRAD) technology have numerous uses, both potential and demonstrated, in facility D ampersand D. These monitors operate by detecting the ions created by alpha particles interacting with ambient air. Thus, detection is not limited by the short range of the alpha particle and no window is required between the contamination and the detection region. These properties make LRAD-based detectors ideal for operation in field environments where complex objects to be monitored are the norm and reliability is crucial. Three monitors of particular interest in D ampersand D operations are the building surface monitor, the internal volume monitor for use on the inner surfaces of pipes, ducts, and tanks, and the conveyer belt monitor for concrete rubble and structural steel. Surface monitors have been used extensively, both in laboratory and field environments, internal volume monitors have been tested in the laboratory, and the conveyer system is still a conceptual design. These monitors and related applications demonstrate the utility of LRAD-based monitors for D ampersand D operations as well as exploring some of the new ways that fieldable monitoring systems can be used for D ampersand D. Ion collection sensing technology can be used to solve many of the alpha detection problems unique to the D ampersand D field
Primary Subject
Source
1995; 8 p; Environmental remediation conference: committed to results; Denver, CO (United States); 13-18 Aug 1995; CONF-950868--4; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; Also available from OSTI as DE95016792; NTIS; US Govt. Printing Office Dep
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
MacArthur, D.; Whiteson, R.
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1998
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1998
AbstractAbstract
[en] for the purpose of this paper, the authors have used the term functional requirement to indicate a required task rather than the recommended method for accomplishing this task. The creation of effective information barrier technology will proceed as a series of steps: (1) IB conceptual Description; (2) IB Functional Requirements (this document--ongoing); (3) IB hardware and software specification; (4) IB hardware and software construction; and (5) IB implementation. This functional requirements document is not intended to supplant or supersede the conceptual description; rather, these functional requirements are intended to be used along with the earlier description to help generate hardware and software requirements
Primary Subject
Source
1998; 7 p; U.S./Russian/IAEA trilateral technical workshop; Aiken, SC (United States); 25-28 Aug 1998; CONF-980887--; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99002297; NTIS; INIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gruetzmacher, K. M.; MacArthur, D. W.
Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2002
Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2002
AbstractAbstract
[en] At Los Alamos National Laboratory (US) (LANL), a recent effort in waste minimization has focused on scrap metal from radiological controlled areas (RCAs). In particular, scrap metal from RCAs needs to be dispositioned in a reasonable and cost effective manner. Recycling of DOE scrap metals from RCAs is currently under a self-imposed moratorium. Since recycling is not available and reuse is difficult, often metal waste from RCAs, which could otherwise be recycled, is disposed of as low-level waste. Estimates at LANL put the cost of low-level waste disposal at $550 to $4000 per cubic meter, depending on the type of waste and the disposal site. If the waste is mixed, the cost for treatment and disposal can be as high as $50,000 per cubic meter. Disposal of scrap metal as low-level waste uses up valuable space in the low-level waste disposal areas and requires transportation to the disposal site under Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations for low-level waste. In contrast, disposal as non-radioactive waste costs as little as $2 per cubic meter. While recycling is unavailable, disposing of the metal at an industrial waste site could be the best solution for this waste stream. A Green Is Clean (GIC) type verification program needs to be in place to provide the greatest assurance that the waste does not contain DOE added radioactivity. This paper is a review of available and emerging radiation monitoring and assay systems that could be used for scrap metal as part of the LANL GIC program
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
28 Feb 2002; 13 p; WM Symposia, Inc., Tucson, Arizona; Waste Management 2002 Symposium; Tucson, AZ (United States); 24-28 Feb 2002; Available from PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/835247-g1GsW0/native/
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
MacArthur, D.; Aamodt, P.; Bounds, J.; Koster, J.
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1999
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States)1999
AbstractAbstract
[en] There are numerous facilities, both within the US and in the rest of the world, within the complex of radiation laboratories and production plants where tritium has been released into the environment because of historic or ongoing mission-related operations. Many of environmental restoration projects have detected low levels of tritium contamination in local streams, ponds, and/or ground water. Typically these waters are moving or have the potential to move offsite and are viewed as a potential risk to the public and environment. Los Alamos National Laboratory will modify the well-proven long-range alpha detection (LRAD) technique for detection of ionizing radiation to optimize a system for detecting tritium in groundwater and other surfaces. The LRAD technique relies on detection of ionized air molecules rather than direct detection of ionizing radiation. The detected electrical current is proportional to the number of ionized air molecules present, which is in turn a measure of the amount of contamination present. Although this technique has been used commercially to measure alpha contamination on objects and surfaces, the technique is also ideal for monitoring low-energy beta particles. The authors have demonstrated beta detection using 54Mn, 14C, 147Pm, 99Tc, 90Sr, and 36Cl sources. Thus, the detector technology and detection of beta particles using this technology have both been demonstrated. The extreme short range of tritium beta particles necessitates an optimization of the detector system. In this paper, the authors will discuss these new designs
Primary Subject
Source
1999; 11 p; Waste management '99 symposium; Tucson, AZ (United States); 28 Feb - 4 Mar 1999; CONF-990201--; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99001991; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
ALKALINE EARTH ISOTOPES, BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES, BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES, CARBON ISOTOPES, DAYS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES, ELECTRON CAPTURE RADIOISOTOPES, EVEN-EVEN NUCLEI, HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES, HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS, HYDROGEN ISOTOPES, INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI, INTERNAL CONVERSION RADIOISOTOPES, ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES, ISOTOPES, LIGHT NUCLEI, MANGANESE ISOTOPES, MEASURING INSTRUMENTS, MONITORING, NUCLEI, ODD-EVEN NUCLEI, ODD-ODD NUCLEI, OXYGEN COMPOUNDS, PROMETHIUM ISOTOPES, RADIOISOTOPES, RARE EARTH NUCLEI, STRONTIUM ISOTOPES, TECHNETIUM ISOTOPES, WATER, YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
MacArthur, D.; Johnson, M.W.; Nicholas, N.J.; Whiteson, R.
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1998
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)1998
AbstractAbstract
[en] This paper discusses the detailed requirements for an information barrier (IB) for use with verification systems that employ intrusive measurement technologies. The IB would protect classified information in a bilateral or multilateral inspection of classified fissile material. Such a barrier must strike a balance between providing the inspecting party the confidence necessary to accept the measurement while protecting the inspected party's classified information. The authors discuss the structure required of an IB as well as the implications of the IB on detector system maintenance. A defense-in-depth approach is proposed which would provide assurance to the inspected party that all sensitive information is protected and to the inspecting party that the measurements are being performed as expected. The barrier could include elements of physical protection (such as locks, surveillance systems, and tamper indicators), hardening of key hardware components, assurance of capabilities and limitations of hardware and software systems, administrative controls, validation and verification of the systems, and error detection and resolution. Finally, an unclassified interface could be used to display and, possibly, record measurement results. The introduction of an IB into an analysis system may result in many otherwise innocuous components (detectors, analyzers, etc.) becoming classified and unavailable for routine maintenance by uncleared personnel. System maintenance and updating will be significantly simplified if the classification status of as many components as possible can be made reversible (i.e. the component can become unclassified following the removal of classified objects)
Primary Subject
Source
1998; 12 p; 39. Institute of Nuclear Materials Management (INMM) annual meeting; Naples, FL (United States); 26-30 Jul 1998; CONF-980733--; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99001814; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
MacArthur, D.; Gunn, R.; Dockray, T.; Luff, C.
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (United States)1999
Los Alamos National Lab., NM (United States). Funding organisation: USDOE Office of Energy Research, Washington, DC (United States)1999
AbstractAbstract
[en] Radiation monitoring systems based on the long-range alpha detection (LRAD) technique, such as the BNFL Instruments IonSens trademark, provide a single contamination measurement for an entire object rather than the more familiar individual readings for smaller surface areas. The LRAD technique relies on the ionization of ambient air molecules by alpha particles, and the subsequent detection of these ions, rather than direct detection of the alpha particles themselves. A single monitor can detect all of the ions produced over a large object and report a total contamination level for the entire surface of that object. However, both the unrestricted release limits specified in USDOE Order 5400.5 (and similar documents in other countries), and the definitions of radioactive waste categories, are stated in terms of contamination per area. Thus, conversion is required between the total effective contamination as measured by the LRAD-based detector and the allowable release limits. In addition, since the release limits were not written assuming an averaging detector system, the method chosen to average the assumed contamination over the object can have a significant impact on the effective sensitivity of the detector
Source
1999; 12 p; Waste management '99 symposium; Tucson, AZ (United States); 28 Feb - 4 Mar 1999; CONF-990201--; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99002062; NTIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference; Numerical Data
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Both environmental restoration (ER) and decontamination and decommissioning (D and D) require characterization of large surface areas (walls, floors, in situ soil, soil and rubble on a conveyor belt, etc.) for radioactive contamination. Many facilities which have processed alpha active material such as plutonium or uranium require effective and efficient characterization for alpha contamination. Traditional methods for alpha surface characterization are limited by the short range and poor penetration of alpha particles. These probes are only sensitive to contamination located directly under the probe. Furthermore, the probe must be held close to the surface to be monitored in order to avoid excessive losses in the ambient air. The combination of proximity and thin detector windows can easily cause instrument damage unless extreme care is taken. The long-range alpha detection (LRAD) system addresses these problems by detecting the ions generated by alpha particles interacting with ambient air rather than the alpha particle directly. Thus, detectors based on LRAD overcome the limitations due to alpha particle range (the ions can travel many meters as opposed to the several-centimeter alpha particle range) and penetrating ability (an LRAD-based detector has no window). Unfortunately, all LRAD-based detectors described previously are static devices, i.e., these detectors cannot be used over surfaces which are continuously moving. In this paper, the authors report on the first tests of two techniques (the electrostatic ion seal and the gridded electrostatic LRAD detector) which extend the capabilities of LRAD surface monitors to use over moving surfaces. This dynamic surface monitoring system was developed jointly by Los Alamos National Laboratory and at BNFL Instruments. All testing was performed at the BNFL Instruments facility in the UK
Secondary Subject
Source
1998; 11 p; SPECTRUM '98: nuclear and hazardous waste management international topical meeting; Denver, CO (United States); 13-18 Sep 1998; CONF-980905--; CONTRACT W-7405-ENG-36; ALSO AVAILABLE FROM OSTI AS DE99000741; NTIS; INIS; US GOVT. PRINTING OFFICE DEP
Record Type
Report
Literature Type
Conference
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
MacArthur, D.; Rawool-Sullivan, M.; Dockray, T.
Proceedings of the international topical meeting on nuclear and hazardous waste management (SPECTRM '96): Volume 21996
Proceedings of the international topical meeting on nuclear and hazardous waste management (SPECTRM '96): Volume 21996
AbstractAbstract
[en] The sensitivity and application of traditional alpha monitors is limited by the short range of alpha particles in air (typically 10 cm) and in solid materials (typically tens of μm). Detecting small amounts of alpha-emitting contamination inside pipes presents particular problems. The alpha particle cannot penetrate the walls of the pipe. Associated gamma-ray detection and active neutron interrogation is often used to detect large amounts of radioactive material in pipes, but these methods are of limited use for detecting small amounts of contamination. Insertion of traditional alpha probes works well in large-diameter straight, pipes, but is increasingly difficult as the pipe network becomes smaller in diameter and more complex. Monitors based on long-range alpha detection (LRAD) detect ionization of the ambient air rather than the alpha particles themselves. A small fan draws the ions into an externally mounted ion detector. Thus, the air in the pipe serves as both the detector gas and the mechanism for transporting the alpha-induced ions to a detection grid outside of the pipe. All of the ions created by all of the contamination in the pipe can be measured in a single detector. Since ambient air serves as the open-quotes probe,close quotes crushed or twisted sections of pipe can be monitored almost as effectively as straight sections. The pipe monitoring system described in this paper was tested both at Los Alamos and at BNFL's Sellafield reprocessing facility in the UK. In this paper, the authors report on the first field tests of the pipe monitoring system
Primary Subject
Source
Anon; 875 p; 1996; p. 1086-1090; American Nuclear Society, Inc; La Grange Park, IL (United States); SPECTRUM '96: international conference on nuclear and hazardous waste management; Seattle, WA (United States); 18-23 Aug 1996; American Nuclear Society, Inc., 555 N. Kensington Avenue, La Grange Park, IL 60526 (United States)
Record Type
Book
Literature Type
Conference
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
AbstractAbstract
[en] Funding for fusion energy R ampersand D by the Federal government is an important investment in the development of an attractive and possibly essential new energy source for this country and the world in the middle of the next century and beyond. This funding also sustains an important field of scientific research - plasma science - in which the United States is the world leader and which has generated a panoply of insights and techniques widely applicable in other fields of science and in industry. And U.S. funding has been crucial to a productive, equitable, and durable international collaboration in fusion science and technology that represents the most important instance of international scientific cooperation in history as well as the best hope for timely commercialization of fusion at this time because the development costs are too high and the potential economic returns too distant. But funding fusion is a bargain for society as a whole. However, in light of present congressional funding climates the authors are suggesting a program which falls far short of what US DOE is proposing, but provides monies to keep the program alive, and to retain limited participation in the international program which currently is aimed at the construction of ITER. This limited funding will severly strain the program as it exists domestically at present, will limit industrial participation, will stretch the reasonable date for an operating demonstation fusion reactor, but will maintain the basic stucture of a domestic fusion research program
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Modenov, A; Bulatov, M; Livke, A; Morkin, A; Razinkov, S; Safronov, S; Elmont, T; Langner, D; MacArthur, D; Mayo, D; Smith, M; Luke, S J
Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2005
Lawrence Livermore National Lab., Livermore, CA (United States). Funding organisation: US Department of Energy (United States)2005
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report describes the software development for the plutonium attribute verification system--AVNG. A brief synopsis of the technical solution for the measurement system is presented. The main tasks for the software development that is underway are formulated. The development tasks are shown in software structural flowcharts, measurement system state diagram and a description of the software. The current status of the AVNG software development is elucidated
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
10 Jun 2005; 7 p; 46. INMM Annual Meeting of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management; Phoenix, AZ (United States); 10-14 Jul 2005; W--7405-ENG-48; Available from OSTI as DE00878226; PURL: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/878226-2AVDkf/; PDF-FILE: 7 ; SIZE: 0.4 MBYTES
Record Type
Report
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | Next |