Filters
Results 1 - 10 of 12
Results 1 - 10 of 12.
Search took: 0.06 seconds
Sort by: date | relevance |
AbstractAbstract
[en] In this short paper, uncertainties on resource stock and on technical progress are introduced into an intertemporal equilibrium model of optimal extraction of a non-renewable resource. The representative consumer maximizes a recursive utility function which disentangles between intertemporal elasticity of substitution and risk aversion. A closed-form solution is derived for both the optimal extraction and price paths. The value of the intertemporal elasticity of substitution relative to unity is then crucial in understanding extraction. Moreover, this model leads to a non-renewable resource price following a geometric Brownian motion
Primary Subject
Record Type
Journal Article
Journal
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Bouttes, Jean-Paul; Gollier, Christian; Mascle Allemand, Anne-Laure; Pommeret, Aude; Preud'homme, Eric
Agence nationale pour la gestion des dechets radioactifs - Andra, 1/7, rue Jean Monnet, Parc de la Croix-Blanche, 92298 Chatenay-Malabry Cedex (France)2020
Agence nationale pour la gestion des dechets radioactifs - Andra, 1/7, rue Jean Monnet, Parc de la Croix-Blanche, 92298 Chatenay-Malabry Cedex (France)2020
AbstractAbstract
[en] After an overview of the peculiarities of the CIGEO project and of its socio-economic assessment (exceptionally far horizon, benefits out of standards, poorly defined alternate options, uncertain and hardly monetizable data), this report presents the method adopted for the socio-economic assessment, describes the context, and evokes the French national strategy. It presents the reference scenarios which have been designed to characterise the society. Then, it presents compared project options, an assessment of the costs of the different options, an assessment of benefits and avoided risks for the different options. It finally presents and discusses assessment results (discussion of how to combine scenarios, how to valorise risks)
Original Title
Evaluation Socio-economique du Projet Cigeo - Avis du Comite d'experts. Synthese de l'evaluation socioeconomique du projet Cigeo. Contre-expertise de l'evaluation socioeconomique du projet de CIGeO - Rapport au Secretaire general pour l'investissement
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
31 Jul 2020; Mar 2021; 156 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
CALCULATION METHODS, COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS, COST ESTIMATION, ECONOMIC IMPACT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, FORECASTING, FRANCE, GOVERNMENT POLICIES, HAZARDS, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC OPINION, RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL, RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE, RISK ASSESSMENT, SOCIAL IMPACT, SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS, TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Auverlot, Dominique; Meilhan, Nicolas; Mesqui, Berengere; Pommeret, Aude; Margerie, Gilles de; Lenglart, Fabrice; Broca, Olivier de; Chasseloup, Sylvie; Roulle, Jean-Michel
France Strategie, Commissariat general a la strategie et a la prospective, 18, rue de Martignac 75700 Paris SP 07 (France)2018
France Strategie, Commissariat general a la strategie et a la prospective, 18, rue de Martignac 75700 Paris SP 07 (France)2018
AbstractAbstract
[en] Based on information gathered in Germany, United-Kingdom, Netherlands, Spain, Norway, United States (notably California), India and China, this study aimed at a better knowledge of the strategic framework regarding electric vehicles, of engine types and of fleet electrification rate, and of incentives in favour of different types of clean vehicles. It also aimed at a better knowledge of policies implemented to develop charging point infrastructures or charging stations, and of measures aimed at supporting employees and enterprises who are not manufacturing thermal vehicles. While outlining an actual strong increase of electric vehicle sales, notably in some countries like China, a first part notices that, despite strong political commitments, the development and sales level are rather low. A second part analyses and compares public incentives and instruments, and outlines their importance to increase sales (a suppression of support measures may result in collapse in sales as noticed in some countries). The third part addresses the deployment of charging points, its financing, and its difficulties. Then, the authors discuss how to anticipate a large scale development of production while taking some characteristics of the automotive sector into account, and by defining a true industrial policy. They also highlight some uncertainties regarding job creation
Original Title
Les politiques publiques en faveur des vehicules a tres faibles emissions. Rapport + Note de synthese
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
May 2018; 148 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT, AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, BATTERY CHARGING, CHINA, COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS, ECONOMIC IMPACT, ELECTRIC-POWERED VEHICLES, ENERGY POLICY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, FINANCING, FRANCE, INDIA, LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, NETHERLANDS, NORWAY, POLITICAL ASPECTS, PRODUCTION, SOCIAL IMPACT, SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS, SPAIN, UNITED KINGDOM, USA
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Dato, Prudence; Durmaz, Tunc; Pommeret, Aude, E-mail: prudence.dato@univ-savoie.fr, E-mail: tdurmaz@yildiz.edu.tr, E-mail: aude.pommeret@cityu.edu.hk
French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists - FAERE, LAMETA, Batiment 26, Campus Supagro-INRA, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 2 (France)2017
French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists - FAERE, LAMETA, Batiment 26, Campus Supagro-INRA, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, Cedex 2 (France)2017
AbstractAbstract
[en] The aim of the study is to analyze investments in intermittent renewable energy and energy storage by a household (HH). The novelty of our model accrues from the flexibility it assigns to a HH in feeding (purchasing) electricity to (from) the grid or storing energy from renewable energy installations. We study the consequences of demand-side management for a HH by accounting for three levels of equipment in smart grids. The first level refers to the possibility of feeding electricity to the grid, which can be achieved relatively simply by net metering. The second level concerns the installation of smart meters. The third level relates to energy storage. We analyze decisions concerning photovoltaic system and energy storage investments, and the consequences of energy storage and smart meters for electricity consumption and purchases of electricity from the grid. Additionally, we study the desirability of a smart meter installation and the implications of curtailment measures for avoiding congestion. Our results indicate that dynamic tariffs, which should encourage HHs to use the power system efficiently and, thus, to save energy, can lead to more reliance on the grid. Thus, the dynamic tariff structure needs to be carefully planned. (authors)
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
6 May 2017; 34 p; ISSN 2274-5556; ; 28 refs.; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Criqui, Patrick; Mesqui, Berengere; Bueb, Julien; Gerardin, Maxime; Le Hir, Boris; Pommeret, Aude; Vermandel, Gauthier; Robinet, Alice; Cremel, Stephane; Guibert, Olivier de; Domergue, Silvano; Alberola, Emilie; Arsalane, Yasmine; Prag, Andrew); Combet, Emmanuel; Marchal, David; Bureau, Dominique; Dechezlepretre, Antoine); Devezeaux de Lavergne, Jean-Guy; Glachant, Matthieu; Hajjar, Joseph; Keppler, Jan Horst; Philibert, Cedric; Marignac, Yves; Perez, Yannick; Quirion, Philippe
France Strategie, 20 avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2021
France Strategie, 20 avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2021
AbstractAbstract
[en] Whereas the assessment of abatement costs of the different decarbonization solutions is crucial for the definition of an efficient climate strategy, these documents report works of a commission which aimed at specifying the meaning of abatement cost, and at defining a methodological framework for the calculation of these abatement costs. The first report presents the concept and calculation methods of social-economic abatement costs: definition of an efficiency indicator which is consistent with the theory of investment (example with hybrid, electric and thermal vehicles), practical implementation, perception of costs within a broader perspective, methodological synthesis and recommendations. The other reports propose examples of abatement costs for different sectors: transports (situation and peculiarities of the sector, replacement of conventional vehicles by low-emission vehicles, fuel decarbonization in the case of biofuels, levers of technological efficiency and behavioural levers), electricity (sector peculiarities, scenarios of assessment of abatement costs, calculation of production costs, of emission reductions and of abatement costs, calculation of the electricity production marginal cost for usage electrification), hydrogen (usages of hydrogen, hydrogen production technologies excluding electrolysis, technical and economic characteristics of electrolysis, analysis of electric power production), housing (situation and objectives, sector specificities, application to housing renovation, cases of office buildings and of heat networks), and cement (present situation, actions to reduce emissions, calcined clays to reduce the need in clinker, carbon capture and sequestration to produce low-carbon clinker)
[fr]
Suite a la signature de l'Accord de Paris en 2015, la France s'est engagee a atteindre la neutralite carbone a horizon 2050. La Strategie nationale bas carbone (SNBC), revisee tous les cinq ans, constitue la feuille de route francaise pour lutter contre le changement climatique: elle detaille les actions a mettre en oeuvre dans chaque secteur. Le present travail vise a fournir des outils methodologiques dans la perspective de l'elaboration de la troisieme SNBC. Les couts d'abattement des differentes solutions de decarbonation, c'est-a-dire leur cout rapporte aux emissions evitees, sont en effet une donnee essentielle pour l'elaboration d'une strategie climat efficace. Le recours au cout d'abattement socioeconomique permet de hierarchiser les actions de decarbonation et d'identifier celles susceptibles de maximiser les reductions effectives d'emissions de gaz a effet de serre, a niveau d'effort donne pour la collectivite. La comparaison du cout d'abattement a la valeur de l'action pour le climat (VAC)1 etablit l'efficacite socioeconomique d'une action. Elle doit par ailleurs permettre de s'assurer que le niveau d'effort consenti reste proportionne au regard de la trajectoire nationale de reduction des emissions vers la neutralite carbone en 2050. Suite au rapport de la commission Quinet sur la valeur de l'action pour le climat en fevrier 2019, qui faisait le constat de la necessite 'de poser un cadre methodologique clair et partage pour pouvoir evaluer le cout d'abattement socioeconomique des differentes actions', la commission sur les couts d'abattement des emissions de gaz a effet de serre a ete installee en septembre 2019. Presidee par Patrick Criqui, directeur de recherche emerite au CNRS, elle est composee d'economistes et d'experts sectoriels. L'objectif des travaux de la commission est triple: - preciser le sens (ou les) sens que l'on donne au 'cout d'abattement' et definir un cadre methodologique partage pour les calculs de ces couts; - expliquer l'interpretation qui peut etre faite d'une evaluation des couts d'abattement en fonction du mode de calcul retenu, en particulier preciser comment elle peut etre comparee a la valeur de l'action pour le climat; - presenter les couts d'abattement harmonises d'une serie de technologies ou d'actions pour la reduction des emissions ainsi que l'utilisation qui pourrait en etre faite au service des politiques climatiques et les limites de ces utilisations. Une premiere partie methodologique explicite le concept et les methodes de calcul des couts d'abattement socioeconomiques. Les travaux de la commission sont ensuite publies secteur par secteur. Six parties thematiques presentent des illustrations des couts d'abattement pour six grands secteurs: transports, electricite, hydrogene, batiment, industrie et agricultureOriginal Title
Les couts d'abattement - Rapport de la commission presidee par Patrick Criqui: Partie 1 - Methodologie, Partie 2 - Transports, Partie 3 - electricite, Partie 4 - Hydrogene, Partie 5 - Logement, Partie 6 - Ciment
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Jun 2021; May 2023; 629 p; 88 refs.; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT, BUILDINGS, CALCULATION METHODS, CEMENT INDUSTRY, COST ESTIMATION, DECARBONIZATION, ECONOMICS, ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT, FINANCIAL INCENTIVES, FRANCE, HYDROGEN, NATIONAL ENERGY PLANS, RECOMMENDATIONS, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, RESIDENTIAL SECTOR, SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS, TRANSPORTATION SECTOR
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Bueb, Julien; Le Hir, Boris; Mesqui, Berengere; Pommeret, Aude; Margerie, Gilles de; Salin, Mathilde; Quinet, Emile; Broca, Olivier de; Chasseloup, Sylvie; Combaud, Matthieu; Bureau, Dominique; Gollier, Christian; Quinet, Alain; Millot, Ariane; Maizi, Nadia; Cail, Sylvain; Bchini, Quentin; Boitier, Baptiste; Fougeyrollas, Arnaud; Koleda, Gilles; Le Mouel, Pierre; Zagame, Paul; Callonnec, Gael; Cance, Raphael; Saussay, Aurelien; Criqui, Patrick; Dassa, Francois; Trochet, Jean-Michel; De Cara, Stephane; Bamiere, Laure; Jayet, Pierre-Alain
France Strategie, 20 Avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2019
France Strategie, 20 Avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2019
AbstractAbstract
[en] The fight against global warming requires us to limit quantities of greenhouse gases present in the atmosphere, carbon gas in particular. In order to honour its commitments in this regard, France must significantly step up its efforts. It is well behind schedule as regards the trajectory it needs to follow if it is to achieve the goal of climate neutrality, or net zero GHG emissions ('Net-Zero'), inscribed in the 2015 Paris Agreement and the 2017 Climate Plan. In order to de-carbonize, investments must be made to reduce emissions. The choice of what investments to carry out must be made according to a cost per metric ton of emissions avoided. This is what the State is doing for its own investments, making it a rule to take account of a value of the metric ton of CO2 (or equivalent) avoided in the socioeconomic analyses it carries out. This is the 'shadow price' of carbon. The rule should be extended to all activities generating greenhouse gas emissions, in order to be able to provide a 'value for climate action' applicable to them. The Prime Minister requested Alain Quinet - who had already been responsible for an initial report on the subject in 2008 - to form a commission tasked with revising the shadow price, with support from France Strategie's teams and taking account of the many developments that have taken place over the last ten years. Alain Quinet's report provides a comprehensive overview of analyses enabling definition of a trajectory of values to be taken into account if we are to achieve the goal of net zero GHG emissions by 2050, given the current and foreseeable state of techniques available for reduction of emissions and carbon capture. The evolution of goals and techniques, together with the fact that we have fallen behind as regards the desirable emissions trajectory, requires significant upward revision of the target shadow price, which should be to the tune of Euros 250 per metric ton of CO2 in 2030, whereas the target set for the same year in 2008 was Euros 100. The report requests the public authorities to adopt policies enabling this value to be taken into account as widely as possible. The 'Value for Climate Action' Commission recommends that tools be employed that go beyond simple price signals, combining all instruments - including regulations and measures facilitating access to credit and fostering green investments - that might have equivalent effects. This pragmatic approach is necessary to enable effective implementation that takes account of all the economic and social consequences of these essential developments, and provides appropriate responses to them
Original Title
La valeur de l'action pour le climat. Une valeur tutelaire du carbone pour evaluer les investissements et les politiques publiques. Rapport de la commission presidee par Alain Quinet + complements au rapport
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Feb 2019; 600 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT, CARBON DIOXIDE, COST ESTIMATION, ENERGY CONSERVATION, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, GREENHOUSE EFFECT, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, INVESTMENT, MITIGATION, NUCLEAR ENERGY, PARIS AGREEMENT, RECOMMENDATIONS, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS, TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION, WHOLESALE PRICES
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Autret, Yannick; Bergeot, Laurent; Gaubert, Helene; Gloriant, Stephane; Marcus, Vincent; Meurisse, Benedicte; Nicklaus, Doris; Bain, Pascal; Brisse, Romain; Picciani, Massimiliano; Beelmeon, Julie; Delporte, Vincent; Lassus, Jean-Luc; Risler, Ophelie; Beroud, Loic; Boubault, Antoine; D'Hugues, Patrick; Laurent, Faustine; Lefebvre, Gaetan; Villeneuve, Jacques; Bouyer, Etienne; Burgun, Francoise; Delprat-Jannaud, Delphine; Dion, Axel; Engelstein, Samy; Gaillaud, Jean-Francois; Galin, Remi; Lecureuil, Aurelie; Gavaud, Olivier; VIEL, Dominique; Geldron, Alain; Mehl, Celine; Hache, Emmanuel; Marquer, Didier; Mesqui, Berengere; Pommeret, Aude; Raimbault, Louis; Tardieu, Bernard; Vidal, Olivier; Viel, Dominique; Wallard, Isabelle
Commissariat general au developpement durable, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France); Ministere de la Transition ecologique, Direction generale de l'amenagement, du logement et de la nature - DGALN (France); Bureau des recherches geologiques et minieres - BRGM (France); Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives - CEA (France)2020
Commissariat general au developpement durable, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France); Ministere de la Transition ecologique, Direction generale de l'amenagement, du logement et de la nature - DGALN (France); Bureau des recherches geologiques et minieres - BRGM (France); Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives - CEA (France)2020
AbstractAbstract
[en] After a recall of the context created by the French roadmap for circular economy, and by the mineral resource programming plan, this report addresses photovoltaic technologies which may be mobilised during the ten years to come for the French energy transition. The different chapters address the numerous components with more or less specific properties (from photoelectric effect to PV power plants), the expected development of photovoltaic energy (indispensable to energy transition, with important consequences on the demand in mineral resources), the analysis of the PV sector (choices of technologies, identification of associated key materials), the evolution of stakes related to PV resources under the influence of crystalline technologies and their evolutions, and the role of French and European actors on the photovoltaic market. It also states recommendations to better manage supplies, to develop and to diffuse solutions to reduce material needs of the photovoltaic sector and associated environmental impacts, to guarantee the deployment (on the French soil) of high environmental performance and low carbon PV technologies consistent with climate objectives, to favour the industrial development in France and Europe of a high environmental performance and low carbon PV sector
[fr]
Apres avoir rappele le principe de l'effet photovoltaique et les differents elements constitutifs necessaires a un systeme photovoltaique pour transformer l'energie solaire en electricite utilisable par l'homme (partie I), la partie II illustre par quelques chiffres l'extraordinaire bond en avant accompli par le photovoltaique, que ce soit au niveau national, europeen ou mondial. Une fois presentees les principales technologies mobilisables pour la transition energetique francaise, la partie III identifie les technologies a analyser et montre la diversite des matieres et materiaux-cles mobilises par le photovoltaique. Nombre de ces matieres et materiaux sont par ailleurs utilises par toutes les technologies, energetiques ou non. La partie IV decrit les matieres specifiques a chacune des technologies retenues ainsi que les risques economiques, environnementaux et sociaux associes a chaque etape de la chaine de valeur, lorsque les donnees sont disponibles. Chaque risque peut etre un facteur limitant pour la technologie concernee. La partie V explore les opportunites industrielles europeennes en approfondissant le cas de la France, lorsque cela est pertinent. La partie VI presente, sous forme de recommandations, des leviers pour reduire les risques et exploiter les opportunites industrielles precedemment identifieesOriginal Title
Le photovoltaique: choix technologiques, enjeux matieres et opportunites industrielles
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
Dec 2020; 112 p; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
CRYSTAL STRUCTURE, ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, EUROPEAN UNION, FRANCE, GLOBAL ASPECTS, MARKET, MINERAL RESOURCES, NATIONAL ENERGY PLANS, PHOTOVOLTAIC CONVERSION, PROGRAM MANAGEMENT, RECOMMENDATIONS, RISK ASSESSMENT, SOLAR ENERGY, SOLAR INDUSTRY, SUPPLY AND DEMAND, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Gloriant, Stephane; Vergez, Antonin; Nicklaus, Doris; Geldron, Alain; Antoine, Loic; Biscaglia, Stephane; Berthomieu, Nadine; Cheverry, Marc; Parrouffe, Jean-Michel; Geldron, Alain; Aime, Jeremie; Bouyer, Etienne; Lambert, Florence; Rosini, Sebastien; Perdu, Fabien; Autret, Yannick; Bergeot, Laurent; Gaubert, Helene Ministere de la Transition ecologique; Gloriant, Stephane; Marcus, Vincent; Nicklaus, Doris; Vergez, Antonin; Bain, Pascal; Brisse, Romain; Picciani, Massimiliano; Berger, Stephane; Dion, Axel; Marfaing, Olivier; Beroud, Loic; Delprat-Jannaud, Florence; Raimbault, Louis; Engelstein, Samy; Vavasseur, Sean; Florea, Tudor; Risler, Ophelie; Ruffenach, Coralie; Vieillefosse, Alice; Gaillaud, Jean-Francois; Galin, Remi; Lecureuil, Aurelie; Gavaud, Olivier; Hache, Emmanuel; Laurent, Faustine; Leguerinel, Mathieu; Lettry, Marion; Marquer, Didier; Pommeret, Aude; Tardieu, Bernard; Vidal, Olivier; Viel, Dominique; Wallard, Isabelle; D'Hugues, Patrick; Viel, Dominique
Commissariat general au developpement durable - CGDD, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France); Direction generale de l'amenagement, du logement et de la nature - DGALN (France); Bureau des recherches geologiques et minieres - BRGM (France); Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives - CEA (France)2020
Commissariat general au developpement durable - CGDD, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France); Direction generale de l'amenagement, du logement et de la nature - DGALN (France); Bureau des recherches geologiques et minieres - BRGM (France); Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives - CEA (France)2020
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report aims at shedding a light on material consumptions associated with network transformations related to the development of smart grids and to the low-carbon transition, and on economic, environmental (beyond the only carbon print) and social stakes related to these materials. After a description of the present operation of the electric power grid, it presents disruptions due to the integration of renewable energies into the power system with a description of envisaged solutions on the short and medium term (smart grid technologies, network physical strengthening), and an identification of key materials. Then, it presents the different stationary storage solutions (batteries, hydrogen), identifies technologies to be analysed, and necessary materials. In a third part and for some materials used in the adopted technologies, it describes associated economic, environmental and social risks. It also explores European industrial opportunities, more particularly in the case of France when relevant. It finally presents recommendations regarding levers for the reduction of risks and for the exploitation of the previously defined industrial opportunities
[fr]
Ce rapport a pour ambition d'apporter un eclairage sur les consommations de matieres associees a ces transformations du reseau ainsi que sur les enjeux economiques, environnementaux (au-dela de la seule empreinte carbone) et sociaux que ces matieres soulevent. Apres avoir presente le fonctionnement actuel du reseau electrique, la partie I s'attache a presenter les bouleversements induits par l'integration des energies renouvelables dans le systeme electrique. Elle decrit ensuite les solutions envisagees a court et a moyen terme (technologies 'smart-grids' et renforcement physique du reseau) et identifie les matieres et materiaux-clefs qu'elles mobilisent. Le stockage stationnaire, notamment par les batteries et l'utilisation de l'hydrogene, devraient etre mobilisees a plus long terme en France metropolitaine (au-dela de 2030). La partie II presente ces differentes solutions de stockage et identifie les technologies a analyser dans le cadre de ce rapport d'etape ainsi que les matieres qu'elles mobilisent. Le partie III decrit, pour certaines matieres contenues dans les technologies retenues, les risques economiques, environnementaux et sociaux qui y sont associes. etant donnee l'extreme diversite des matieres mobilisees sur les reseaux electriques, cette analyse ne peut etre exhaustive et des choix de matiere ont du etre effectues. L'etude de ces risques tout au long de la chaine de valeur, telle que realisee dans le rapport d'etape nr 1 sur le photovoltaique, n'a pu etre realisee, faute de temps et de donnees disponibles, que pour les cables electriques en cuivre et en aluminium. La partie IV explore les opportunites industrielles europeennes en approfondissant le cas de la France, lorsque cela est pertinent. La partie IV presente, sous forme de recommandations, des leviers pour reduire les risques et exploiter les opportunites industrielles precedemment identifieesOriginal Title
Les reseaux electriques, lignes electriques, stockage stationnaire et reseaux intelligents: choix technologiques, enjeux matieres et opportunites industrielles. Plan de programmation des ressources minerales de la transition bas-carbone
Primary Subject
Source
Dec 2020; 164 p; 71 refs.; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
ECONOMICS, ELECTRIC UTILITIES, ENERGY STORAGE, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, FRANCE, HYDROGEN, MATERIAL BALANCE, POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, POWER TRANSMISSION LINES, RECOMMENDATIONS, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, RISK ASSESSMENT, SMART GRIDS, SOCIAL IMPACT, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Geldron, Alain; Biscaglia, Stephane; Cheverry, Marc; Ducreux, Bertrand-Olivier; Antoine, Loic; Perdu, Fabien; Rosini, Sebastien; Bouyer, Etienne; Burlet, Helene; Lambert, Florence; Lecureuil, Aurelie; Vergez, Antonin; Walkowiak, Michael; Gaubert, Helene; Autret, Yannick; Bacry, Hugo; Gaubert, Helene; Gloriant, Stephane; Marcus, Vincent; Tromeur, Eric; Vergez, Antonin; Walkowiak, Michael; Bain, Pascal; Picciani, Massimiliano; Bazzuchi, Pierre; Ferran, Ghislain; Florea, Tudor; Force, Christine; Lasfargues, Sylene; Prevors, Lionel; Risler, Ophelie; Ruffenach, Coralie; Vieillefosse, Alice; Bialkowski, Anne; Beylot, Antoine; D'Hugues, Patrick; Laurent, Faustine; Lefebvre, Gaetan; Leguerinel, Mathieu; Berger, Stephane; Bollenot, Martin; Dion, Axel; Marfaing, Olivier; Beroud, Loic; Nicklaus, Doris; Brossard, Jean Luc; Leclere, Nicolas; Miffand, Heloise; Buchet, Marie; Delprat-Jannaud, Florence; Raimbault, Louis; Gaillaud, Jean-Francois; Gavaud, Olivier; Pochez, Remi; Hache, Emmanuel; Lecureuil, Aurelie; Lettry, Marion; Morville, Jerome; Marquer, Didier; Mesqui, Berengere; Pommeret, Aude; Tardieu, Bernard; Vavasseur, Sean; Vidal, Olivier; Wallard, Isabelle; Viel, Dominique
Commissariat general au developpement durable, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France)2022
Commissariat general au developpement durable, Service de l'economie verte et solidaire, Sous-direction de l'economie et de l'evaluation, Tour Sequoia, 92055 La Defense cedex (France)2022
AbstractAbstract
[en] In France, the National Low-Carbon Strategy (SNBC) defines a path for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. The effort to reduce emissions will be based mainly on mobility, which is the main greenhouse gas emitter in France, thanks to a low-carbon electric power mix. In 2050, the objective is to achieve carbon neutrality in the transport sector. This transition is based on changes in modes of transport and the deployment of new technologies that reduce CO2 emissions over their life cycle. This report studies these technologies, their material impacts and the associated vulnerabilities and opportunities
[fr]
En France, la Strategie nationale bas-carbone (SNBC) definit une trajectoire de reduction des emissions de gaz a effet de serre afin d'atteindre la neutralite carbone a l'horizon 2050. L'effort de reduction des emissions reposera principalement sur la mobilite, qui est le principal emetteur de gaz a effet de serre en France, grace a un mix electrique faiblement carbone. En 2050, l'objectif est d'atteindre la neutralite carbone du secteur du transport. Cette transition repose sur des changements de modes de transports et sur le deploiement de nouvelles technologies qui permettent de reduire les emissions de CO2 sur leur cycle de vie. Ce rapport etudiera ces technologies, leurs impacts matieres et les vulnerabilites et opportunites associeesOriginal Title
La mobilite bas-carbone: Choix technologiques, enjeux matieres et opportunites industrielles. Plan de programmation des ressources minerales de la transition bas-carbone
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
24 Feb 2022; 172 p; 9 refs.; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT, CARBON DIOXIDE, CARBON FOOTPRINT, CARBON NEUTRALITY, ENERGY SOURCE DEVELOPMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, FRANCE, GREENHOUSE GASES, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, LOW-EMISSION VEHICLES, NATIONAL ENERGY PLANS, PLANNING, RISK ASSESSMENT, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, TECHNOLOGY IMPACTS, TRANSPORTATION SECTOR
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
Pisani-Ferry, Jean; Robinet, Alice; Viennot, Mathilde; Schweizer, Romain; Aussilloux, Vincent; Garner, Helene; Jolly, Cecile; Riedinger, Nicolas; Mahfouz, Selma; Pommeret, Aude; Oliu-Barton, Miquel; Schubert, Katheline; Timbeau, Xavier; Geerolf, Francois; Malliet, Paul; Hamdi-Cherif, Meriem; Delahais, Adrien; Ghersi, Frederic; Depoues, Vivian; Nicol, Morgane; Callonec, Gael; Gourmand, Logan; L'Heude, William; Girard, Pierre-Louis; Trinh, Jerome; Rannou, Felix; Fouquet, Mathieu; Godzinski, Alexandre; Marcus, Vincent; Le Hir, Boris; Pinton, Caroline; Dees, Stephane; Gaye, Annabelle de; Wegner, Oriane; Fontagne, Lionel; Bellevrat, Elie; Lequien, Matthieu; Abbas, Riyad; Carnot, Nicolas; Larrieu, Sylvain; Tettaravou, Athiana; Epaulard, Anne; Bouet, Antoine; Perego, Erica; Vicard, Vincent; Jean, Sebastien; Gouel, Christophe; Langot, Francois; Tripier, Fabien; Hentzgen, Carole; Orand, Michael; Cousin, Camille; Le, Jerome; Villedieu, Pierre; Janelli, Raphael; Combet, Emmanuel; Blanchet, Didier; Pesme, Craig
France Strategie, 20, Avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2023
France Strategie, 20, Avenue de Segur, TSA 90725, 75334 Paris Cedex 07 (France)2023
AbstractAbstract
[en] This report first outlines the emergency of a wide-ranging action to face climate stakes: an economic cost of inaction much greater than that of action, the Paris agreement as the best available framework, the European Union as a leader in climate action, an associated mutation which can be compared with an industrial revolution, the issue of relationship between climate transition and economic growth. It outlines faced difficulties to do in ten years what has not been done during thirty years, to make the necessary and important investments, with an uncertain macroeconomic impact and a commitment to equity, a strong impact of a climate-neutral economy on public finances, a risk of inflationist configuration, and possibly insufficient instruments to address the competitiveness issue for Europe. Detailed thematic reports are provided in appendices which more precisely address specific related issues and aspects: Sobriety, Damages and adaptation, Inflation, Productivity, Competitiveness, Labour market, Capital market, Distributive stakes, Modelling, Well-being, Indicators and data
Original Title
Les incidences economiques de l'action pour le climat - Rapport, Mai 2023 + Rapports thematiques: Sobriete, Dommages et adaptation, Inflation, Productivite, Competitivite, Marche du travail, Marche du capital, Enjeux distributifs, Modelisation, Bien-etre, Indicateurs et donnees
Primary Subject
Secondary Subject
Source
May 2023; 902 p; 586 refs.; Available from the INIS Liaison Officer for France, see the INIS website for current contact and E-mail addresses
Record Type
Miscellaneous
Report Number
Country of publication
CLIMATIC CHANGE, COMPETITION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC IMPACT, ECONOMICS, ENERGY CONSERVATION, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, ENERGY POLICY, ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, EUROPEAN UNION, FINANCING, FRANCE, GLOBAL ASPECTS, PARIS AGREEMENT, PLANNING, SOCIAL IMPACT, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Reference NumberReference Number
INIS VolumeINIS Volume
INIS IssueINIS Issue
1 | 2 | Next |