Quais são os aspectos mais frustrantes do design de interação para profissionais de UX?

To showcase complex or huge data by following interaction design principle can be frustrating for UX Professionals. These cluttered interfaces minimize user interest to acheive required task.

Despite rigorous research, sometimes UX professionals misinterpret user needs, leading to designs that feel clunky or irrelevant. Witnessing users struggle with their creations can be disheartening. Neglecting accessibility creates barriers for users with disabilities, causing ethical and practical frustrations. Designing inclusively takes extra effort, but the rewards are profound. Convincing stakeholders to prioritize user-centered design over aesthetics or business pressures can be an uphill battle. Navigating conflicting priorities and justifying design decisions can be frustrating. Convincing stakeholders to prioritize user-centered design over aesthetics or business pressures can be an uphill battle.

Scope creep is the dragon we all aim to slay in design projects. It sneaks in, disrupting plans, making a stressful, and threatening quality. 

 How do I solve it? 

 Define project scope clearly, document it like sacred scrool, and communicate continuously. Manage my expectations, evaluate wisely, and keep the ship sailing smoothly.

Accepting that iterations are a normal and expected cycle in the designing process is the first step. Yes, it's frustrating to see an initial scope change, but it might be for a good reason. In early user testing you might find that an assumption you've made in the early stages of the design process was not as expected and now you need to take a little step back. It's a learning opportunity. It is important that the judgement error is fixed, otherwise your users will remain frustrated.

Let's talk about the beast in the design realm – scope creep. It's like designing a car, and suddenly they want it to fly. Scope creep, my friend, is the ultimate party crasher. Imagine planning a road trip, and halfway through, your buddies decide to detour to the moon. Chaos! To dodge this menace, lay down a concrete project scope, seal it in an ironclad contract, and keep those communication channels wide open. Changes are cool, but they need to be like invited guests, not gatecrashers.

User feedback for websites can be very vague. Often there is no way to ask follow-up questions. Therefore it's important that you collect as much contextual information next to the actual user feedback in order to dig a little deeper. Contextual information like position on a webpage, the path that is followed, the device, operating system and browser someone uses, the country someone is in, possibly even a screenshot of the moment the feedback is given. With this information you yourself can try to reproduce the issue someone found in the design when the feedback is not very clear.

Design standards, the unsolicited rulebook that sometimes feels like it was written during the medieval ages. They're supposed to guide us, but often they feel like overbearing in-laws at a family dinner. "Thou shall not deviate!" Well, guess what? We're designers, not robots. It's crucial to understand the why behind these standards, and then, my friend, feel free to break a few rules. Adapt them to fit your project like a bespoke suit, not one-size-fits-all medieval armor.

Collaboration – sounds like a harmonious choir, right? More like a rock band with everyone playing a different tune. Design collaboration can be a minefield of inefficiencies and miscommunication. Picture this: you're playing chess, and everyone's moving pieces randomly. Chaos! To nail this, set a shared vision, define the game plan, and let everyone know their role. Communication is your sword, and coordination is your shield. Use them wisely.

Ah, the moral compass of design – design ethics. It's like walking a tightrope in a world filled with gray areas. What might seem crystal clear to you might look like a foggy maze to others. To navigate this, keep your moral radar sharp. Consult the rulebook, consider the consequences, and, most importantly, put yourself in the user's shoes. Design with a sprinkle of empathy, a dash of honesty, and a heap of responsibility.

Alright, the stage is yours. Ever been in a design battle where the unexpected happened? Or maybe witnessed a design decision that made everyone raise an eyebrow? Share the tales that don't fit the conventional sections. Let's add some spice to this design saga!