Community Land Trust Network reposted this
Josh Westerling, Nick Plumb and Ailbhe (Alva) McNabola have written a brilliant paper for Power to Change on how strong and communities could be the foundation for cohesion and growth. So much to agree with in this, but a few additional suggestions from me. They recommend that developers and landowners work with community organisations to build and transfer ownership of social infrastructure, referencing Sherford CLT as a good example. Plunkett UK and the Community Land Trust Network could provide many, many more examples. The mechanism to do this is planning policy - it should be written into the NPPF, and into the rules for Homes England and Development Corporations and other public agencies shaping development. They recommend that the English Devolution Bill give communities a Right to Control Investment such as the UK Shared Prosperity Fund where there is an accountable local body. There's a precedent in the 'neighbourhood share' of the Community Infrastructure Levy, which could easily be extended to the 2/3rds of non-parished areas of England by allowing other accountable community bodies like CLTs to be nominated by the council to receive the share (and have a right to request this, with a process of appeal). Their proposal for a Community Growth Network, modelled on the New Schools Network, echoes a proposal from Owen Jarvis, Blase Lambert and I for an endowed foundation able to develop community-led development institutions. But a nuanced difference is that ours wasn't for entirely community-level institutions - we thought it should help to create a small cadre of regional and national institutions more capable of convening the professional skills, access to private capital, etc. to then partner with and support community businesses to develop and deliver their objectives. This mixed-level infrastructure was one of the key ingredients in the success of the co-operative economies in the north of Italy and Spain. They say combined authorities should include the social economy as part of Local Growth Plans. This might also connect to Mark Gregory's proposal that funds like the Community Ownership Fund are coordinated by local/combined authorities with reference to these plans, and to Local (development) Plans. So the social economy is wired into their economic and planning strategies - a particular opportunity where combined authorities are likely to gain new strategic planning powers. Lots more in there - dig in! https://lnkd.in/e84Pt4fj