If the real-life consequences weren't so dire, the desire by some conservatives to shroud their policy preferences in the mantle of Dr. King's vision of a world where the color of one's skin wasn't so closely tied to one's life chances would be quaint and a little sad. Like a belief in Bigfoot or a flat Earth...
The real life consequences are dire, however. Blacks die younger, live sicker, endure constrained educational and housing opportunities in ways that are directly and demonstrably tied to race. Black maternal severe morbidity and mortality (SMM) being 2.5 times higher than their white counterparts in Massachusetts is not a result of "cultural or other differences that have nothing to do with race", as the Globe's Jacoby would have us believe.
Dr. King was a leader in the Civil Rights Movement. He was not, and never claimed to be, the only voice of authority on the movement. The Civil Rights Movement was explicitly about combating racism against Black people and the real-life substantive consequences of racism. People fought and died to eliminate racial oppression. They did not fight and die to make skin color irrelevant.
It's especially disappointing to see a Boston columnist, with the City's history of redlining and violent resistance to school desegregation, attempt this slight of hand to mischaracterize King's words and an entire movement. Here, in Boston, we know better. Racism exists and is expressed in policy decisions and the institutions that those decisions create and regulate.
The egregious wrong in this piece is to borrow King's moral authority to deny the existence and impact of racism. It's a trope that is repeatedly used to avoid honest policy discussions and decision making.
If Jacoby wants to make a case against affirmative action or DEI, he should try to make it on the merits. If he wants to meet with leaders in public health and argue that the gap in life expectancy in Boston can be addressed in a colorblind fashion, or meet with leaders at the Federal Reserve Bank and argue that racial redlining has nothing to due with the racial wealth gap, he should have at it.
What he can't do, without being held accountable, is to cherry-pick one line out of a lifetime of struggle and use it characterize a reactionary retrenchment in public policy as a step towards justice.
#mapoli #bospoli #civilrights #healthdisparities CommonWealth Beacon Michael Curry, Esq. Segun Idowu Rahsaan D. Hall NAACP Andrea Joy Campbell Linda Dorcena Forry Colette Phillips Marie St. Fleur Ruthzee Louijeune Bisola Ojikutu MD MPH FIDSA John Auerbach Lauren Smith Julia Mejia Brian Worrell Christopher Worrell Russell Holmes, MBA, CFP®Liz Miranda Lydia Edwards Black on Beacon Hill Delaney Policy Group Black Economic Council of Massachusetts, Inc. jim braude Doris Kearns Goodwin
https://lnkd.in/eFyazTgW