ADVOMART’s Post

Bengaluru Court grants bail to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in BJP Defamation case Reported by Deeksha Dabas Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/gm5Y59kg #SpecialCourtforMPMLA #RahulGandhibail #Bengaluru #BJPDefamationcase #DeputyCMDKShivakumar #KarnatakaChiefMinisterSiddaramaiah #scconline #SCC #legalnews #legalknowledge #scctimes #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews

Bengaluru Court directs Rahul Gandhi to personally appear on June 7 without fail in BJP Defamation case Reported by Deeksha Dabas Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/gu6H6awH #BengaluruCourt #BJPDefamationcase #June7 #personallyappear #rahulgandhi #SpecialCourtMP #MLA #scconline #SCC #legalnews #legalknowledge #scctimes #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews

Delhi High Court dismisses Mahua Moitra's defamation suit against MP Nishikant Dubey and Anant Dehadrai in Cash-for-Query Case Reported by Arunima B. Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/g77QhetN #AnantDehadrai #BharatiyaJantaParty #BJP #CashforQueryCase #DefamationSuit #DelhiHighCourt #MahuaMoitra #NishikantDubey #TMC #TrinamoolCongress #scconline #SCC #legalnews #scconlineblog #legalknowledge #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews

The Gujarat High Court’s recent decision to invalidate the inclusion of heirs in a defamation suit against Shah Rukh Khan and the Raees team underscores a critical aspect of defamation law: personal claims for defamation expire with the complainant’s death. This ruling reinforces the principle that the right to sue for defamation is a personal right and not transferable to descendants. The court’s adherence to legal maxims and statutory provisions in reaching this conclusion marks a significant affirmation of established defamation principles. #Raees #ShahRukhKhan #DefamationLawsuit #LegalUpdate #BollywoodNews #LegalPrinciples #CourtCase #IndianLaw #GujaratHighCourt #Justice

No Criminal Proceedings Can Lie For 'Defamation' Of Banned Organisation Kerala HC Observation observed that PFI is a banned association in India; therefore, defamation cannot be alleged against a banned organization, since it has no legal entity. While quashing the defamation case against the media house, the Court observed that a banned organization cannot raise a complaint of defamation. “the Popular Front of India may come within the definition of 'person' as defined in Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. But when 'the Popular Front of India' itself is banned in India by the Central Government, such a banned association will not come within the purview of Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, because, a banned association has no legal entity. For that simple reason, I am of the considered opinion that the prosecution against the petitioners is to be quashed.” As per the facts, the General Secretary of PFI alleged that Bharat Prakashan (Delhi) Limited, a public limited media house has published..... for more information kindly see the document

Tough situation for Arvind Kejriwal as the Supreme Court rejected his plea in the defamation case regarding PM Modi's qualification. What is the whole Defamation case? Read everything in detail through this article👇🏻 For more informative and trending news, visit ARCLANTIC

Gujarat HC dismisses Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh's plea against summons in PM Modi Degree Defamation case Reported by Deeksha Dabas Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/gyN44wAN #GujaratHighCourt #PMModiDefamationCase #PMModiDegreeCase #ArvindKejriwal #JusticeHasmukhDSuthar #GujaratUniversity #SanjaySingh #summons #scconline #SCC #legalnews #scconlineblog #legalknowledge #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews

Rs 50 lac damages in a civil defamation case Recently the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri vs. Saket Gokhale & Anr. awarded whooping Rs 50lac damages to the plaintiff in her defamation suit. The judgment is quite illustrated and runs through 100+ paragraphs. However, one of the notable instances in this case is the amount of damages awarded. This is one of the steps taken by the Indian judiciary wherein high damages are granted to the plaintiff in a defamation case. As per my observation, the Indian courts are slightly cautious in in awarding high damages in defamation cases, however cases like the aforesaid have clarified that the day is not far away when the amount of damages will act as a huge deterrent in the society as we see in the western part of the world. #law #defamation #linkedin #lawyers #lawstudents

A Pune Court has issued a process against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, mandating his appearance on August 19, 2024, in a defamation case related to his remarks on VD Savarkar. The case, filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of the late Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, alleges that Gandhi made defamatory statements during a visit to the United Kingdom. Judicial Magistrate First Class Akshi Jain issued the process on May 30, 2024, under Section 204 of the CrPC, following a complaint lodged by Satyaki Savarkar. Advocate Sangram Kolhatkar, representing Savarkar, highlighted that Gandhi has repeatedly defamed VD Savarkar on various occasions. One notable incident occurred on March 5, 2023, when Gandhi addressed the Overseas Congress in the UK. The complaint asserts that Gandhi knowingly made false allegations against Savarkar to harm his reputation and cause mental distress to the complainant and his family. The defamatory speech, although delivered in England, had repercussions in Pune as it was widely published and circulated throughout India. Satyaki's complaint includes several news reports and a YouTube video of Gandhi's speech as evidence. He claims Gandhi falsely accused Savarkar of writing a book describing the beating of a Muslim person—an incident that never happened. Satyaki argues that these false allegations were made with the intent to defame Savarkar. The defamation application demands the maximum punishment for Gandhi under Section 500 (Punishment for defamation) of the IPC and seeks the highest compensation as per Section 357 (Order to pay compensation) of the CrPC. The court recorded statements from Satyaki and two witnesses in January 2024 and directed the Pune City police to investigate the defamation complaint as per Section 202, CrPC. Following the submission of the police inquiry report on May 27, 2024, the judicial magistrate took cognizance of the complaint and issued the process against Gandhi. #DefamationCase #RahulGandhi #VDSavarkar #PuneCourt #LegalNews #CriminalLaw #Advocate #IndianJudiciary #LegalProceedings #Section500IPC #CrPC #LegalUpdates #Justice #LawyersPerspective

In a significant ruling, a Delhi court has ordered a woman to pay ₹15 lakh to her ex-husband for defamation, highlighting the delicate balance between freedom of expression and protection of reputation. The case underscores the importance of responsible communication, especially on social platforms. Legal professionals should note the increasing judicial scrutiny on defamation claims in the digital age. As we navigate these complexities, it’s crucial to uphold ethical standards and foster respectful discourse. Here are five key points from the defamation order: Defamation Criteria: The court emphasized that for a defamation claim to succeed, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made a false statement that caused harm to their reputation. Burden of Proof: The burden of proof lies on the complainant to establish that the statements made by the defendant were defamatory and false. Quantifiable Harm: The court awarded damages based on the quantifiable harm caused to the plaintiff, including emotional distress and damage to professional reputation. Compensation Awarded: The court ordered the defendant to pay ₹15 lakh in damages to the ex-husband for the defamatory statements. Legal Precedent: The judgment sets a significant legal precedent in cases involving defamation between spouses, highlighting the legal ramifications of making unsubstantiated allegations. #LegalUpdate #DefamationLaw #EthicalCommunication #DigitalAge #delhihighcourt #defamation https://lnkd.in/eipsUmwW