Buro Happold’s Post

The AIA recognizes nine Latinx architects. Did you ever wonder about the ratio of Latinx architects to construction workers? Three percent of US licensed architects are Latinx (NCARB, AIA). There are about 3 to 4 million Latinx construction workers in the US (BLS), 30-35% of the total workforce. The workers hands-on experience can be incredibly valuable in design, however the apprenticeship-to-design pipelines are still in conceptual design.

Bringing a sense of the local to a nationwide project that will positively shape our urban and rural landscapes. 7N’s second project featured in the 198th RSA Annual Exhibition is our HUB Station for Network Rail. The ‘Critical Action’ theme of Jude Barber’s architecture room placed emphasis on projects that create civic value and a connection with their location. We were delighted that our design for sustainable railway stations was selected as an example of how a project can reflect its context, while being flexible enough to be implemented across the UK. Developed as a model to re-imagine what a station could become in the 21st century, the HUB Station concept is a blueprint for a new generation of environmentally sustainable, community focused transport hubs. This kit of parts comprises a simple, adaptable, and scalable catalogue of standardised elements that can be tailored to the context and locality of each station, whilst maintaining a consistent national identity. HUB Station champions railways as a progressive and sustainable mode of transport, one which has a pivotal civic role in serving communities throughout the country. Within the exhibition, you will see a 00 gauge model of a typical station and a rendering for our design that won the 2020 RIBA international competition. The Royal Scottish Academy of Art and Architecture, Edinburgh 11th May – 16th June https://lnkd.in/eANtnqWN Client: Network Rail Structures & MEP: Arup Costs: Gardiner & Theobald LLP Landscape: LUC Visualisation: Pillar

Retrofitting Old Structures For Modern Needs: Challenges And Solutions Retrofitting old structures for modern needs is a critical aspect of architectural and engineering endeavors. As urban centers grow and evolve, the demand for adaptive reuse of existing buildings increases. However, this process comes with its own set of challenges, ranging from structural integrity to compliance with modern codes and standards. In this blog post, we’ll explore the complexities of retrofitting old structures and examine innovative solutions to address them. #RetrofittingChallenges #ModernizingOldStructures #BuildingForTheFuture #HistoricRetrofit #OldStructuresNewNeeds #InnovativeRetrofit #ModernRetrofitSolutions #UpgradingHistoricBuildings

One of the questions Foreign Architects often ask me during consultations, when they are structuring their LinkedIn profile or when they are in the process of applying for the EB2 NIW is: what are the types of U.S. associations? Which ones should I join? Which ones carry more weight? Generally speaking, the AIA is the association that carries the most weight for a professional. While the NCARB is also very important for managing the process of architectural licensing in the U.S., being an international member of the AIA already counts a lot. Americans see associations as a way for professionals to engage with their profession, which is why the vast majority of professionals here will list some type of association or certification after their name. The associations here are divided into: 1. Constituency-based: These are the ones that provide some type of membership or have a constituency. Examples: - The American Institute of Architects (AIA) - American Institute of Architecture Students (AIAS) - Association of Architecture Organizations (AAO) - National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB) - National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA) 2. Cause-based: Focused on a particular cause or problem that needs to be addressed. Examples: - Architects without Borders - Architecture for Humanity - Public Architecture - American Architectural Foundation (AAF) - Green Building Initiative (GBI) - U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) 3. Knowledge-based: Exist to promote or serve a particular area or expertise. Examples: - American College of Healthcare Architects (ACHA) - Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) - The Center for Health Design (CHD) - Facility Guidelines Institute (FGI) - Urban Land Institute (ULI) And how does this translate? 🤔 ON LINKEDIN, BUSINESS CARDS, WEBSITES, AND ANY TYPE OF PRESENTATION: You use your name + the nomenclatures of the associations. It's also common to list any certifications or licenses you have. Example: Marina Araujo Alves, Assoc. AIA, USGBC, LEED Green Associate. Associations: Associate of AIA and associate of USGBC Certifications: LEED Green Associate Anyone using 'AIA' immediately after their name is indicating that they are a licensed architect in the U.S. Did you know about all these associations in the U.S.? Comment below what you think! 😃

A lovely day was had with the Medical Architecture team, yesterday. My first visit to the Scottish Parliament for a number of years, too. What a building it remains. It’s almost impossible to conceive of something of that ambition being delivered now, sadly. After walking around with fresh eyes, it’s hard not to feel that we’ve lost our boldness as a nation and retreated by several steps in terms of how we express ourselves to the wider world (by which I’m talking in the more general context of the UK, as opposed to Scotland, specifically). The quality of materials and workmanship continue to shine through, too. A testament to investment made in the best means via which to fully realise the many, many idiosyncrasies of the building. Put at the mercy of our current ‘Value Engineering’ culture, it’s a slightly worrying thought to consider what might have ultimately been delivered and its subsequent condition following two decades of use… And, yes, the significant cost of the building no doubt retains a level of residual controversy in some quarters. But when viewed through the lens of the passage of time, it is hard not to feel that the final sum is commensurate with the quality of the project and the complexity of the design (notwithstanding the fact that the earliest estimates were made without either a defined site, or an actual proposal on the table). A building that is truly worth celebrating on the occasion of its 20th birthday and in an era where such opportunities are few and far between.

Planning, designing and construction of buildings, in terms of its footprints, height and volume, have always been evolving, devolving, never static and never finite. The ever changing typology of buildings was led by the materials available, specific needs  of human living , available construction technologies, innovations made in the area of the structure; relevance of aesthetics and structural safety. Accordingly, buildings reflect and represent the art ,architecture and culture of the era, and remain unique and distinct to humanity , community and climate of the specific area/ region, in which they were created.Considering the entire context of built environment, preserving and conserving the state of art and unique buildings; have been valued by communities, states and nations and has assumed importance, both locally and globally, for  the reason such buildings have been recognized to be valuable resource for bridging the gap & linking past with present. However, enormous increase in human numbers; uncontrolled expansion of the human settlements ; rapid urbanization, unplanned, haphazard and unregulated growth and development  are known to adversely impact and pose greatest threat to the valuable heritage. This has led to large volume of valuable built environment lost in the haze of unplanned growth and development.  Efforts are now being made to rationalize and redefine the process of development so that these spaces don’t lose their originality, importance, sanctity and  inherent values, making cities lose its identity.  It needs to understood and appreciated that development within the historic environment is known for its complexity and challenges. Rational development in the areas of historical importance needs expertise and understanding of large number of components which inter-alia includes, historic landscape, geomatics,  architectural legislation, evaluating heritage, historic environment constraints and relevant planning conditions, for assessing their potential impact on a project in order to create a balance between heritage and development. Historic structures remain unique and universal resources of humanity and community. Once lost, they cannot be replaced and replicated. If their special qualities are degraded, these can rarely be recaptured.

Planning, designing and construction of buildings, in terms of its footprints, height and volume, have always been evolving, devolving, never static and never finite. The ever changing typology of buildings was led by the materials available, specific needs  of human living , available construction technologies, innovations made in the area of the structure; relevance of aesthetics and structural safety. Accordingly, buildings reflect and represent the art ,architecture and culture of the era, and remain unique and distinct to humanity , community and climate of the specific area/ region, in which they were created.Considering the entire context of built environment, preserving and conserving the state of art and unique buildings; have been valued by communities, states and nations and has assumed importance, both locally and globally, for  the reason such buildings have been recognized to be valuable resource for bridging the gap & linking past with present. However, enormous increase in human numbers; uncontrolled expansion of the human settlements ; rapid urbanization, unplanned, haphazard and unregulated growth and development  are known to adversely impact and pose greatest threat to the valuable heritage. This has led to large volume of valuable built environment lost in the haze of unplanned growth and development.  Efforts are now being made to rationalize and redefine the process of development so that these spaces don’t lose their originality, importance, sanctity and  inherent values, making cities lose its identity.   It needs to understood and appreciated that development within the historic environment is known for its complexity and challenges. Rational development in the areas of historical importance needs expertise and understanding of large number of components which inter-alia includes, historic landscape, geomatics,  architectural legislation, evaluating heritage, historic environment constraints and relevant planning conditions, for assessing their potential impact on a project in order to create a balance between heritage and development. Historic structures remain unique and universal resources of humanity and community. Once lost, they cannot be replaced and replicated . If their special qualities are degraded, these can rarely be recaptured

Here’s the clarity architects need on future-proofing historic buildings

Here’s the clarity architects need on future-proofing historic buildings

Here’s the clarity architects need on future-proofing historic buildings