In the realm of innovation and creativity, the interplay between research and design always sparks endless discussion. Some argue for their separation, while others champion their inseparability in the journey of creation. But where does the truth actually lie? 🤔 As someone deeply passionate about both research and design, I see their relationship as far more nuanced than a simple binary. Rather than drawing a rigid line between them, I prefer to see them as symbiotic partners, each enhancing the other to achieve meaningful outcomes. It's disheartening to reduce design to mere software manipulation; it belittles the incredible work of our ancestors and historical storytellers whose continuous understudy of how things works informs a lot of our groundbreaking discoveries. Design's true beauty lies not just in its outcomes, but in the intricate groundwork that precedes them. Over the years, I've explored numerous research methodologies and just this week I have been exposed to not less than 3 that I have never come across before, and the results these methodologies draws out have been astounding. As designers, understanding how research and design intertwine is crucial; neither would reaches its full potential without the other. In essence, design breathes life into research. It takes raw data and insights, infusing them with creativity to craft solutions that resonate with users on a profound level. Design injects humanity into complexity, transforming it into intuitive experiences that captivate and delight.
Great post
--
8moSurplus grammar☺️, well articulated, thanks for the post