There ya have it folks... I hate to be a drag, but rollover protection works much better if you stay within its confines. The primary role of a ROPS is to protect the vehicle's occupants during rollovers, which are not uncommon Rollover protection is essential for reducing the risk of injury or death to operators of vehicles that can roll over, such as tractors and riding mowers: Rollover protective structures (ROPS) ROPS are roll bars or cages that protect the operator from being crushed or thrown from the vehicle in the event of a rollover. ROPS are required by the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) for certain vehicles, including agricultural tractors over 20 horsepower. ROPS are also required for earthmoving equipment, such as dumpers, loaders, and bulldozers. Active rollover protection (ARP) ARP is a system that uses electronic stability control to recognize an impending rollover and apply the brakes to resist it. Seatbelts Using a seatbelt in combination with a ROPS is estimated to be 99% effective in preventing serious injury or death in a rollover.
From what I can see, the excavator operator failed to use the hydraulic arm as a brake & stabiliser when descending a steep slope. Lucky not to have been injured.
Lucky escape there
I don't think he utilized the seat belt , very luck dude
"Human factors" strike again with this near severe injury/fatal construction site incident.
That operator was on track to some serious injuries. Lord’s hand protected him.
Totally agree.....too many times I had conversation with forklift operators about use of seat belt
Wip his But on that one /thanks be to GGGGGGGGGG
His seatbelt didn’t work though…
Safety seat belt , this almost costed him two legs
“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.”
1moThe catastrophic descent of the excavator from an elevated position appears to be the culmination of a multifaceted convergence of mechanical entropy and procedural anomalies. A probable cascade failure initiated by a systemic perturbation in the hydro-mechanical interface—possibly due to cavitation within the hydraulic pump chamber or thermal expansion-induced viscosity irregularities in the hydraulic fluid—would have propagated through the kinematic chain. This, combined with stochastic oscillations in the diesel engine's torque curve—potentially triggered by a transient misfire event due to micro-contaminants obstructing injector nozzles—could have resulted in unanticipated inertial amplification. Furthermore, an insufficiently analysed structural resonance frequency mismatch between the support platform and the excavator's eigenvectors might have exacerbated the destabilisation vector. Ultimately, these dynamics, compounded by an operator-induced kinematic trajectory misalignment, led to a gravitation-driven kinetic recalibration of the excavator’s positional coordinates to a suboptimal elevation.