GW Journal of Ethics in Publishing’s Post

Do you want to share your thoughts on sustainable leadership, ethics, diversity, grants, partnerships, navigating AI in submissions, etc. as it pertains to publishing? Here is a chance to present!

Academic Publishing Profits Without Research: A System in Question In today’s research ecosystem, major academic publishers like Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Wiley have become indispensable for disseminating scholarly work. However, it’s worth questioning their role in the actual research process. These companies achieve high profit margins—Elsevier alone has reported nearly 40% on its £3.06 billion ($3.74 billion) STM revenue—despite not conducting any of the research they publish. What is Their Role? Academic publishers facilitate the publishing process, but the work behind each article—from hypothesis formation to data collection and analysis—is entirely conducted by researchers, often funded by public grants or university support. Despite this, publishers control access to the research, charging institutions substantial subscription fees and authors hefty open-access fees to publish their findings. Why Is This a Problem? This model means researchers effectively pay twice: once to conduct the research and again to make it available to the public or their own institutions. And yet, publishers offer no funding or material contribution to the research itself. Instead, they benefit by managing the peer review process (which researchers also conduct voluntarily) and monetizing the accessibility of the research, often at significant costs to the academic community.

In recent years, academia has witnessed a troubling shift: the rise of paid presentations and for-profit journals that charge researchers to publish. Originally designed to showcase rigorous, peer-reviewed scholarship, these platforms are increasingly becoming commercial ventures, often prioritizing profit over academic integrity. This "pay-to-play" culture creates several issues: Compromised Quality: When journals prioritize fee-based acceptance, they risk diluting the quality of published research. This undermines the value of peer review, where thorough evaluation and critique are essential to academic growth. Gatekeeping Knowledge: Requiring payment for both publishing and accessing academic content creates barriers, especially for scholars from low-resource institutions and developing countries. Academic discourse becomes less inclusive, favoring those with financial means over those with valuable insights. Devaluing Authorship: With the ease of paying for publication, the prestige associated with being a published academic diminishes. This shift pressures academics to produce quantity over quality, potentially impacting the depth and innovation of their work. Undermining Academia's Purpose: Academia's core mission is to foster knowledge, innovation, and critical thinking. The commercialization of knowledge-sharing platforms distracts from these goals, steering academia toward a transactional model that could erode public trust. While publishing costs can support peer review and editing, the balance has tipped too far into monetization. It's time to rethink the value we assign to publications and presentations, supporting open-access initiatives and fostering a culture of quality-driven research over pay-driven prestige

Transitioning scholarly journals into #OpenAccess not only assists researchers and publishers to comply with Open Science mandates covering publicly funded research, but also extends the audience of their output to the public at large https://ow.ly/U6Nj50RpfUO

🔍 Peer review lies at the heart of science publishing, shaping the quality and reliability of research. Yet, the methods vary widely across disciplines and journals. Moreover, despite its undeniable promising advantages lots of scholars remain reluctant to it. 👁️🗨️ Most journals follow a single-blind approach, shielding authors' identities from reviewers (or the opposite). Others opt for a double-blind system, while only a select few embrace openness in their review process due to skepticism or the fear that someone will publish analyses with your data before you can, for example. 🔄 Open peer review, introduces transparency at its core. It ranges from revealing reviewer identities to openly sharing reports and inviting broader participation. In STEM, it emphasizes identity transparency, while humanities focus on open participation. 🤝 The beauty of open peer review lies in fostering constructive criticism and establishing a direct connection between reviewers and authors. It regulates feedback tone, addresses issues like self-citation, and mitigates flaws in traditional double-blind reviews. 📊 Open identities and reports enhance accountability, encourage scholarly exchange, and pave the way for broader knowledge dissemination. However, this transparency isn't without its challenges. 🛑Openness may inadvertently reintroduce biases. Reviewers may be swayed by authors' reputation or institutional affiliations, potentially compromising objectivity. Transparency in peer review exposes reviewers to influence, especially affecting early career academics who may feel pressured to conform to established opinions. Furthermore, young researchers or those from less prestigious institutions might fear repercussions, hindering candid feedback. 💬It's crucial to embrace constructive dialogue and continuous improvement. At In&Sight, we're committed to addressing these concerns head-on! 🔗Article: https://lnkd.in/e5f6PTwh 🔗In&Sight: https://lnkd.in/eQT4dW5V

India’s “One Nation One Subscription” (ONOS) initiative is a significant move to provide free access to 13,000 academic journals, including major publishers like Elsevier, Nature, and AAAS, for over 18 million students, researchers, and faculty. This scheme, costing $715 million over three years, aims to democratize access to scientific knowledge and foster research and innovation across the country. It aligns with the goals of the National Education Policy 2020 and seeks to benefit researchers, especially in underrepresented areas. Other countries have implemented similar centralized access initiatives, though not at this bigscale. Examples include: Germany: Through “Projekt DEAL,” Germany negotiated nationwide agreements with major publishers like Springer Nature and Wiley, providing open-access publishing rights and access to scientific journals for all its institutions. Sweden and Norway: Both countries have negotiated transformative agreements that combine subscription access with open-access publishing rights. China: The Chinese government provides substantial funding to ensure universities and research institutions access leading global journals. By making academic knowledge universally available, ONOS has the potential to transform India’s education and research landscape, placing it among the global leaders in science and innovation in next 10-15 years. India’s ONOS is unique in its breadth and the number of beneficiaries, setting a precedent for other nations looking to democratize academic research.

Transitioning scholarly journals into #OpenAccess not only assists researchers and publishers to comply with Open Science mandates covering publicly funded research, but also extends the audience of their output to the public at large https://ow.ly/Olcf50RpfLR

India’s “One Nation One Subscription” (ONOS) initiative is a significant move to provide free access to 13,000 academic journals, including major publishers like Elsevier, Nature, and AAAS, for over 18 million students, researchers, and faculty. This scheme, costing $715 million over three years, aims to democratize access to scientific knowledge and foster research and innovation across the country. It aligns with the goals of the National Education Policy 2020 and seeks to benefit researchers, especially in underrepresented areas. Other countries have implemented similar centralized access initiatives, though not at this bigscale. Examples include: Germany: Through “Projekt DEAL,” Germany negotiated nationwide agreements with major publishers like Springer Nature and Wiley, providing open-access publishing rights and access to scientific journals for all its institutions. Sweden and Norway: Both countries have negotiated transformative agreements that combine subscription access with open-access publishing rights. China: The Chinese government provides substantial funding to ensure universities and research institutions access leading global journals. By making academic knowledge universally available, ONOS has the potential to transform India’s education and research landscape, placing it among the global leaders in science and innovation in next 10-15 years. India’s ONOS is unique in its breadth and the number of beneficiaries, setting a precedent for other nations looking to democratize academic research.

"Strategies for Enhancing Academic Experience: A Study on Conference Participation, Scientific Publishing, and Continuous Learning" To emphasize the academic experience of the scientific researcher, here are some tips and guidelines: 1. **Conference and Seminar Participation:** Attending scientific conferences and seminars provides the researcher with an opportunity to exchange knowledge with colleagues and experts in their field, as well as to present their research and receive constructive feedback and guidance. 2. **Scientific Publishing:** Publishing research in peer-reviewed scientific journals enhances the academic profile of the researcher and contributes to the dissemination of knowledge and advancement of science. 3. **Continuous Learning:** The researcher's continuous learning of new ideas and theories in their field, and keeping up with scientific and technological developments, helps in developing skills and increasing expertise. 4. **Research Collaboration:** Collaborating with other researchers on joint research projects contributes to the exchange of experiences and ideas, expanding the scientific understanding. 5. **Peer Review:** Participating in the peer review process for research papers enhances the researcher's understanding and contributes to developing their abilities in evaluating scientific work. 6. **Utilizing Technology:** Leveraging technology in scientific research, such as using modern software and tools for statistical analysis and data processing. 7. **Engagement in Academic Activities:** Such as delivering lectures, training students and new researchers, strengthens the researcher's experience and deepens their understanding of their subjects. 8. **Maintaining a Reliable Work Record:** Accurately documenting research and academic activities helps in building a strong work record and enhances the researcher's credibility. 9. **Participation in Exchange Programs:** Such as academic exchange programs with other universities, and training at renowned research centers, provides the researcher with opportunities to learn from diverse experiences. 10. **Engaging with the Scientific Community:** Exchanging ideas and discussions with colleagues and experts in the research field enhances the researcher's understanding and contributes to expanding their academic horizons. These tips help in enhancing the academic experience of the scientific researcher and developing their skills in the academic field.