I've been reflecting on my interview with Dr Jacoba Matapo and I'm concerned about the impact of government funding cuts on Pacific institutions. With frequent government changes, it's crucial to find sustainable solutions for Pacific organizations that rely heavily on government funding to support their vital work in strengthening and uplifting Pacific communities. To mitigate these risks, I believe we should explore diversifying funding sources and fostering unity among Pacific organizations to share resources and expertise. This would enable them to continue delivering essential outcomes even in uncertain financial times. It's disheartening to see projects discontinued due to funding shortages… what steps do you think we could take to develop better strategies for better risk management and ensure the long-term viability of our Pacific institutions? Full link to episode below: https://lnkd.in/gArGMhfH
Hana Schmidt’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Investing in prevention pays off: for every $1 spent on conflict prevention, $16 is saved. The EU must act by scaling up ODA to at least €200 billion over the next #MFF, focusing on preparedness and resilience to tackle future crises before they happen. A focus on preparedness and resilience isn’t just about cutting future costs - it’s about saving lives and creating a more stable, secure world. A choice that is both the moral and the strategic one should be an easy one to make. We count on EU decision-makers to make it. That's why we join 40+ organisations in supporting a looking-forward #MFF budget. You can read the joint paper here: https://lnkd.in/edHNSC7p
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We're often expressing capabilities that are a challenge to generate and capacity that would be exceptionally difficult to sustain. That is not bravado, but simply a commitment to the cause and a heart felt belief in the role to save lives and protect societal value. When that leads into communications to the public, we present support and outcomes that are likely not deliverable. Our supported population begins to believe in an unrealistic expectation of the capability and capacity of emergency management (EM). Citizens need to understand that there is a limit to the capability and capacity of government services, even in disasters, and that irrespective of the level of government involved, there is a place for individual responsibility. There is a role for citizens to contribute to better post event outcomes. That handover spot, the point where EM begins and ends, is not part of the public facing communications. It will take time for EM to ramp up, roll out and become effective on scene, as well there will be a scene sufficiently large to overwhelm the capability and capacity of EM. The time, space and needs outside that bracket are not addressed by EM, but by the population. Preparedness education that leads to capability and capacity within the population is not present in the current model. It creates professional victims. A curriculum of responsibility, outcome management, strategic ideas and skills leads the population past the apathy barrier, through the avoidance behaviour and lands them successfully on a solid foundation of personal belief and capability. Together, resilient communities build capacity. That requires a significant Khun style paradigmatic change in preparedness education. It begins with being honest with the served population. EM exists to support the efforts of the whole society, not rescue it. #emergencymanagement #disastermanagement #emergencypreparedness #preparedness #response #mitigation #recovery #communications #resilience #community #hope #plans #strategy #expectation #truth #honesty #government #governance Preparedness Labs Incorporated https://lnkd.in/ez3Mx-bx
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Looking forward to this session on risk-sharing and accountability tomorrow at #GlobalPerspectives2024! 👇
Please join Michael Vincent Mercado of Center for Disaster Preparedness, Phoebe So of Fenomenal Funds, @Jan Bouwman of OXFAM GB, Myriam Gambini of International Civil Society Centre and me (of Alliance2015) for an honest and practice-driven conversation on the journey towards ''new wave'' risk management and compliance. It's part of the juicy-looking International Civil Society Centre #GlobalPerspectives2024 event on : Truth, Trust, and Technology tomorrow, Tuesday, 26 November 2024. #RegisterNow! here: https://lnkd.in/eaAZdRx8 Find out more and view the full conference programme here: https://lnkd.in/eJyVNyyc If you're interested in Re-imagining the INGO (RINGO) initiatives, this one's for you!
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We started Partnerships for People and Place (or PfPP as it immediately became known) to test whether bringing central government into challenges faced by local places could make a difference to people's lives. Yesterday we published our evaluation, guidance for officials and loads of data and evidence about flows of money and case studies. It was quite a moment! Some thoughts: 1. I've been privileged to meet dozens, maybe hundreds, of brilliant, passionate people in community groups, neighbourhoods and local government working their guts out to make people's lives better. I'm proud that PfPP enabled some incredible results which genuinely changed lives. All the people we worked with saw the value in joining up, but ... 2. ...joining up is hard! At a local level it takes leadership, trusting relationships and commitment to keeping it going. We found, when trying to bring in central government, that it worked best when central teams were looking for new ways of tackling the challenges our places were dealing with, when people in the central teams 'got' the value of approaching the issue at a place level, and when there were established mechanisms in place to build a common understanding of the issue. And our PfPP team had to be on hand to help navigate the systems at both ends. Fig.1 page 7 of the evaluation shows this well. I'll put it in the comments because I can't figure out how to paste it here! 3. There's so much learning in what we've published, but I was most struck by the gap in understanding between local and central government, which meant we spent far more time than we expected acting as translators between two very different worlds. So I'm particularly interested in how, as officials and officers, we narrow that gap. I think it could make a big difference to how we make policy at the centre because we'd have a better understanding of the variety of ways in which our policies might be delivered, and the opportunities that could be unlocked by designing them in a way to make the most of those local contexts. Interested in ways to achieve that. Huge thanks to all involved in this work, far too many to list! https://lnkd.in/e9bxpHzC
Very pleased to share that we have today published a series of documents related to the Partnerships for People & Place Programme on GOV.UK. You can see the full set of documents here: https://lnkd.in/e8xjsMeb It’s all absolute gold of course, but I wanted to flag up three specific products which give a good flavour of the work overall. Firstly, this note to support civil servants on overcoming five barriers to place-based policymaking that we identified through PfPP, including practical tips and advice - https://lnkd.in/eVmBniXh Second up is the evaluation report on the whole programme, which we commissioned Ipsos to deliver - lots of positives, alongside some very constructive criticism to learn from - https://lnkd.in/e2t8eGtt And finally, the cross-government spend mapping work that Grant Thornton did for us, showing Sankey Diagrams (think ‘spaghetti strands’) of funding and policymaking going into 13 specific places, from various government departments/ALBs - https://lnkd.in/eYnx9uSU I am really proud of this work and the team that delivered it. Please do feel free to share it with others who might be interested.
Partnerships for People and Place
gov.uk
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I'm excited to share my contribution to The Routledge Handbook on Crisis, Polycrisis, and Public Administration, where I explore how modern governance can adapt to our increasingly complex world. In Chapter 7, I examine how public sector crisis management is being transformed by the push-and-pull between fragmentation and integration, local and global forces. Today's political landscape isn't just changing – it's being fundamentally reshaped by advanced technology, evolving philosophical frameworks, and global transformations that challenge traditional notions of authority. Key insights from my research: 1. The emergence of new political actors is redistributing power and influence across multiple levels, creating both challenges and opportunities for crisis response 2. Traditional governance models are increasingly inadequate for addressing contemporary crises that cross borders and jurisdictions Three innovative frameworks offer practical solutions: 1. Multilevel governance 2. Multiscalarity 3. Heterarchy These approaches provide public administrators with more flexible and responsive tools for managing crises in our interconnected world. This work is part of a larger conversation about how we can build more resilient public institutions capable of addressing complex, multi-dimensional challenges. The future of effective crisis management lies in embracing these new paradigms of governance. #crisismanagement #governance #polycrisis #publicpolicy #publicadministration
The Routledge Handbook on Crisis, Polycrisis, and Public Administration
routledge.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I am glad that I have successfully completed the knowledge series “Disaster Risk Financing Solutions for Climate-Resilient Livelihoods in the Agricultural Sector.”
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We have been gathering resources to help you lead bold social justice organizing work safely at this moment when it is most needed. The rise in authoritarian threats to our democracy has made it more crucial than ever to stay safe while continuing to do the important work that will lead to change. Our toolkit includes timely post-election compliance resources and covers important topics such as: Sustainability, De-escalation, Scenario Planning, Risk Mitigation, and Collaborative Infrastructure. Check out the updated Fighting Authoritarianism Toolkit now! https://lnkd.in/gcis4pQX
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
New Report alert📢 Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE)'s assessment of the economic inclusiveness of UWEP is based on the six areas of ACODE’s framework for EIP assessments, which include Program design, Efficacy, Quality of M&E, Efficiency, Compliance, and Risk management. The focus is on evaluating the design, efficacy, efficiency, monitoring and evaluation (M&E), compliance, and risk management of UWEP. The assessment was limited to two parishes in the five central region districts—Mpigi, Luweero, Mukono, Kampala, and Wakiso. https://lnkd.in/ekaSqXEZ
Viewing PDF | Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment
acode-u.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚨 NEW PUBLICATION | The Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation: Towards future-proof crisis management and responses? “Instead of addressing the root causes of a crisis, derogations [from the acquis] may only treat the symptoms, if not coupled with further concerted actions, such as diplomatic and policy initiatives which go beyond the means foreseen by the Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation.” Read EPC’s Alberto-Horst Neidhardt Policy Study on the Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation, developed in collaboration with FEPS and FES here 👇
The Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation: Towards future-proof crisis management and responses?
epc.eu
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Emergency management is ripe for disruption and innovation. With a normalized structure, generally accepted theories and operations system, emergency management is establishing a paradigm. A consistent model upon which processes and procedures contribute to a common desired endstate - better post event outcomes. The embedded processes are ready for innovation and disruption to the system. Across the OECD nations are moving towards fiscal restraint, after a gluttony of spending since the 2008 financial crisis. As such, significant and notable investments (read taxpayer money) into emergency management is unlikely, irrespective of the community's desire to expand. Disruption and innovation are the keys to doing less but achieving similar outcomes. #emergencymanagement #disastermanagment #emergencypreparedness #logistics #supplychain #resilience #community #innovation #disruption #preparedness #businesscontinuity #paradigm #Kuhn #anomaly Preparedness Labs Incorporated https://lnkd.in/d2Bay4Af
Disruption and Innovation
preparednesslabs.ca
To view or add a comment, sign in