The 3days Public Sector Hearing for FY 2025/26 and the medium term budget was impactful. Why public participation in the budget making process? 1. Better Resource Allocation: When citizens participate, they provide valuable insights into the community's priorities, needs, and preferences. This can result in a budget that better reflects the actual needs of the population, leading to more effective and efficient allocation of resources. 2. Increased Trust in Government: Public involvement fosters trust between citizens and government institutions. When people feel their voices are heard and their concerns are addressed, they are more likely to trust that public officials are acting in their best interests. 3. Social Equity: Public participation helps identify marginalized or vulnerable groups that may not be visible in traditional political processes. Ensuring that their needs are considered can promote more equitable budget decisions that serve all segments of society. 4. Promotes Civic Engagement: Involving the public in the budget process helps educate citizens about the workings of government and encourages ongoing participation in civic matters. This leads to a more informed electorate that is engaged in decision-making processes.
Hellen Kituu’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
How can local government tackle educational inequality in the face of budget pressures? In this Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) briefing, we consider the relationship between funding disparities and socioeconomic inequality and the impact upon educational outcomes in Scotland. We look at the roles of local authorities, partner organisations and existing initiatives in tackling these challenges. We consider potential strategies and collaborative approaches to address funding gaps, socioeconomic barriers and disparities in educational attainment. The briefing provides valuable insights for policymakers, educators and other stakeholders. https://lnkd.in/edMgcAgd
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
We are pushing through to the end of legislative session and would love all who support the eco-system of youth development across Washington State to activate on behalf of young people and those who support them. Will you support our budget ask by emailing your State House Appropriations Committee via the below action alert. These funds will get much needed capacity building, continuous quality improvement and professional development to youth development organizations and providers serving youth ages 11-19, who serve historically marginalized communities, are grassroots and smaller sized orgs with a budget under $500K and are serving in rural Washington who don’t have a lobbyist or grant writer. There is a major ESSER cliff coming, and organizations that are doing impactful work for youth in their communities may have to close their doors. Help us, help them, keep their doors open to provide safe space for young people until we can align funding that will sustain the work of youth development moving forward. Every dollar counts right now. #fundyouthdevelopment #Takeactionnow #fornowandnextgeneration
GOOD NEWS! Our $100,000 budget ask has passed the Senate committee and has moved to the House for final approval. We need your support to ask the House Appropriations Committee to fund youth development! Email the House Committee today! https://buff.ly/3wsJpxW
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The US Congress has released the second and final bipartisan package of remaining and overdue funding bills for the fiscal year 2024. This package, also known as a "minibus," needs to be approved by both the House and Senate and signed by the President by the end of the week to avoid a partial government shutdown. Key funding for arts-related agencies and programs has remained unchanged, with no cuts in funding. Additionally, policy proposals that would have eliminated funding for the arts and embassies program within the State Department have been removed. Furthermore, new funding has been added for the first time for community engagement programs within the Department of Defense, including arts-based programs. Here are more details of this final 6-bill minibus: bit.ly/Final6Minibus24
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
📢 Disappointing News for California's Disconnected Communities The Governor’s May Budget Revision falls short on commitments to equitable broadband access, disproportionately affecting communities of color and low-income households. We're deeply disappointed by the retraction of the promised $1.5 billion investment in the Middle-Mile Broadband Initiative (MMBI). This setback risks leaving 20% of the network incomplete, failing to serve the most disadvantaged communities. We urge the Legislature to revisit the MMBI budget to honor commitments to all Californians. Let’s ensure equitable access and uphold promises made. Read the full statement from our statewide coalition (California Alliance for Digital Equity - CADE) below. #OaklandUndivided The Children's Partnership (TCP) NextGen Policy Common Sense Media TURN - The Utility Reform Network Tech Exchange Fresno Coalition for Digital Inclusion Michelson Center for Public Policy California Community Foundation #DigitalEquityLA #BroadbandForAll
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Ever wondered why some legislative compromises seem easier to achieve than others? Here’s something to ponder: 📊 When legislation benefits big donors or politicians, reaching a compromise seems effortless. 📊 However, aid or tax breaks for everyday Americans often get stuck in endless debates. 📊 Case in point: A few years ago, college tuition hikes in North Carolina saw a 90% agreement across political aisles. 📊 Raising tuition or taxes? No problem. Helping the general public? Suddenly, it's complicated. The system seems perfectly set up for control, doesn’t it? How do you think we can push for more people-centric policies? Share your thoughts and experiences below! #Legislation #GovernmentPolicy #HigherEducation #Taxation #PublicInterest #PoliticalCompromise #
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I've just published an in-depth analysis on the city's spending and budget priorities. With the help of dedicated volunteers, we've uncovered concerning financial decisions that directly impact our community. More importantly, the recent city newsletter seems to pressure residents into supporting a tax increase, which I see as a form of "blackmail." Local elections aren’t just about choosing representatives—they're about deciding how your tax dollars are spent, what projects are prioritized, and what kind of future we want for our city. Who we elect can significantly influence the quality of our local services, safety, and development. Simplest example is comparing Dublin and Danville almost same population back in 2010. Your vote in local races, from council members to the mayor, holds far more power than most realize. It shapes the policies and decisions that affect our daily lives. Check out the full article to see why this election matters and how our city's financial health could improve with different decision-making. #LocalElections #CommunityMatters #CityCouncil #SanRamon #FiscalResponsibility #Transparency As always am reading each comment and am taking suggestions from it. Feel free to reach out to me.
San Ramon's Current State, and How We Got Here
kathrani.substack.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
RNZ offers a media piece which poses an interesting question about how democratic societies do things at the level of local Government. Early in the piece we read... Asquith, an industry fellow at the Institute of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Technology Sydney in Sydney, Australia, told RNZ part of the problem is a lack of quality control. "I've long argued there should be a test for people standing for council, because so many people don't know how it all works and they're in it for the wrong reasons." We have concerns about equal access for all in the workplace, a genuine desire to promote equality, freedom of thought and speech, ideas and social practices worth supporting. Are debates about diversity, equity, and inclusion along with the politics of identity and the cancelling of dissenting voices having unintended consiquences regarding who we elect and choose to employ at the level of local Goverment? An almost comical thread is finding a voice about a person chosen to hold a key role in the Secret Service in America whose competence is being questioned. This surfaces because a past president came centimetres from death. Is there a connection between America's choices and our own.
Missing mayors, censured councillors, record rates rises, and Tauranga's return to democracy: What's going on with local government?
rnz.co.nz
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I want to bring your attention to an insightful opinion piece by Libby Mettam, which sheds light on the prevalent issue of pork barrelling, and coincides with election commitments made in the recent Rockingham by-election. Specifically, the promise to allocate $10 million of tax payers funds towards the redevelopment of the Mike Barnett Stadium, a project not scheduled to be considered until 2036. While some of these funds have been used to add a new roof and some fans to the stadium is undoubtedly beneficial, it falls significantly short of the grand promises made during the by-election campaign. This discrepancy raises concerns about the government's intention to prioritise immediate community needs and casts doubt on allocating funds for electoral gains. The misallocation of public funds for political advantage necessitates a thorough investigation. The Rockingham community, deserving of fair treatment, should have their interests prioritised above partisan considerations. It is crucial that projects selected for funding genuinely serve the welfare of the community rather than being driven solely by electoral motives and funded by taxpayer dollars. The lack of oversight and comprehensive evaluation in allocating public resources is disconcerting, jeopardising the principles of transparency and accountability within our democratic framework. We must ensure that every dollar spent is in the community's best interest, guaranteeing a fair and unbiased assessment of project proposals. The commitment to the Mike Barnett Stadium redevelopment appears to have been a political ploy to secure votes in the by-election, with no genuine intention to fulfil the promise. Such conduct undermines the principles of leadership and integrity that are essential for the effective functioning of our democracy. I urge the Rockingham community to demand answers and hold those who make false promises accountable. We can strive for a future where public funds are allocated judiciously and projects are selected based on their true value to the community. #Leadership #Integrity #RockinghamDeservesBetter #TransparencyMatters #AccountabilityFirst
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The Road to Equity: How Public Transit is Helping Youth in Lynnwood https://bit.ly/4dM2j2A
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Yesterday, we officially presented the 2025 Proposed Budget to Toledo City Council in the City Council Chambers. This balanced budget reflects our commitment to providing the core city services our residents rely on while addressing priorities that drive growth and improve quality of life in Toledo. 💡 Curious about the key priorities for 2025? Watch Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz’s interview with 13abc for an in-depth overview: https://ow.ly/s2s050UaZzb
Toledo's mayor releases 2025 budget proposal, emphasizing public safety
13abc.com
To view or add a comment, sign in