NHS England has just published how much the NHS spent, in quite some detail in 2023/24 - see https://lnkd.in/eZWKQuXM
One of the more detailed publications is the provider level information, but, for Admitted Patient Care, 79% of it (i.e. 1,163,663 out of 1,477006 lines of data) has been small number suppressed and replaced with * but I wonder, should it have been?
To illustrate, we know that Manchester University NHS FT, at some point during 2023/24, spent £2,925 on the provision of XC05Z Adult Critical Care 2 Organs Support in the Burns and Plastic Critical Care Unit.
We know that this is for between 1 and 7 bed days of care and given that the national average bed day cost is £3,418 we could guestimate that this is for 1 bed day of care and so relates to a single patient.
That is it, we don't know when during the year this happened, we know nothing about the related patient admission, have no age banding, gender, high level post code, local patient identifier, commissioner etc.
So I am arguing that this is not "Personal Data" and should not be small number suppressed (having read https://lnkd.in/ec_Ae8yQ)
I worry though, am I missing something? Can anyone else see how this could ever be used to identify the patient?