IAIAsa - International Association for Impact Assessment South Africa’s Post

Logosians Attitude towards Law and Order with regards to Environmental Protection. The attitude of Lagosians towards law and order in relation to environmental protection is shaped by various factors, including awareness of environmental issues, experiences with enforcement, and socio-economic conditions. Here are some key points regarding this attitude: 1. Awareness and Concern: Many Lagosians are increasingly aware of environmental issues such as pollution, waste management, and climate change. This awareness often translates into a desire for better environmental protection and adherence to laws aimed at safeguarding the environment. 2. Perception of Enforcement: The effectiveness of environmental laws and regulations in Lagos can be perceived as inconsistent. Many residents may feel that environmental laws are not enforced rigorously, leading to a sense of frustration and skepticism about the government's commitment to environmental protection. 3. Community Engagement: Some communities in Lagos actively engage in environmental protection initiatives, such as clean-up campaigns and tree-planting activities. This grassroots involvement reflects a positive attitude towards environmental stewardship, even in the face of inadequate enforcement. 4. Corruption and Negligence: Corruption within regulatory agencies can undermine public trust in environmental laws. When residents perceive that officials are neglecting their duties or accepting bribes, it can lead to a lack of respect for environmental regulations. 5. Economic Considerations: In a city with high levels of poverty and unemployment, some Lagosians may prioritize economic survival over environmental concerns. This can lead to practices that harm the environment, such as illegal dumping or unregulated construction, especially if they believe that enforcement is lax. 6. Public Health Awareness: Many Lagosians recognize the link between environmental degradation and public health. Issues such as air and water pollution can lead to health problems, prompting a stronger demand for law and order in environmental protection. 7. Activism and Advocacy: There is a growing movement of environmental activists and NGOs in Lagos advocating for better environmental policies and enforcement. This activism reflects a shift towards greater public engagement and accountability regarding environmental issues. In summary, while there is a growing awareness and concern for environmental protection among Lagosians, attitudes towards law and order in this context can be influenced by perceptions of enforcement, economic pressures, and community engagement. Strengthening enforcement mechanisms, promoting public awareness, and fostering community involvement are essential for improving attitudes towards Environmental Protection in Lagos. #Lagos #Environmentalprotection #law

How Do the Natural Resources Conservation Authority (NRCA) and the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) Work Together in Jamaica’s Environmental Permitting Process?: The Natural Resources Conservation Authority (NRCA) and the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) are closely linked in Jamaica’s development and environmental management framework. While the NRCA is the body established to regulate environmental protection, NEPA serves as the administrative and operational arm that executes and enforces the NRCA’s mandates. Here’s how the relationship between NRCA and NEPA operates, especially concerning […] The post How Do the Natural Resources Conservation Authority (NRCA) and the National Environment and Planning Agency (NEPA) Work Together in Jamaica’s Environmental Permitting Process? first appeared on Jamaica Homes.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program aims to make it easier for community-based organizations to access federal environmental justice funding. * Applications are accepted on a rolling basis for the window in which that grant type is open (marked with an “X”). Note that the “Application Due Date” column corresponds with the “Notice of Selection” column. For example, all Type 3 applications received by December 15, 2024 will be reviewed for a potential March 2025 selection notice if approved. Any applications received after December 15, 2024 will be reviewed in the next round with a potential award date of June 2025. Please note that all grants must be complete (all work done and funds spent) by July 31, 2027. Thriving Communities: Grantmaking Timeline, Eligibility Criteria and Webinars

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program aims to make it easier for community-based organizations to access federal environmental justice funding. * Applications are accepted on a rolling basis for the window in which that grant type is open (marked with an “X”). Note that the “Application Due Date” column corresponds with the “Notice of Selection” column. For example, all Type 3 applications received by December 15, 2024 will be reviewed for a potential March 2025 selection notice if approved. Any applications received after December 15, 2024 will be reviewed in the next round with a potential award date of June 2025. Please note that all grants must be complete (all work done and funds spent) by July 31, 2027. Thriving Communities: Grantmaking Timeline, Eligibility Criteria and Webinars

Get the help you need to expedite your project! Are you struggling with entitlement or environmental permitting support? We can help! Use the QR code to check out our website and see the services we can provide you. Feel free to email chris.cox@coxplanningsolutions.com for more information. Alternatively, feel free to send us a direct message to chat about how we can assist you and your project needs. #environmentalplanning #ceqa #nepa #realestatedevelopment #landentitlements #landdevelopment #coxplanningsolutions #duediligence #wetlands #propertydevelopment #permitting #environmentalplanning #environmentalpermitting #environmentalplanner #environmentalconsulting #environmentalconsultant #projectplanning #wetlanddelineation #biologicalresources

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program aims to make it easier for community-based organizations to access federal environmental justice funding. * Applications are accepted on a rolling basis for the window in which that grant type is open (marked with an “X”). Note that the “Application Due Date” column corresponds with the “Notice of Selection” column. For example, all Type 3 applications received by December 15, 2024 will be reviewed for a potential March 2025 selection notice if approved. Any applications received after December 15, 2024 will be reviewed in the next round with a potential award date of June 2025. Please note that all grants must be complete (all work done and funds spent) by July 31, 2027. Thriving Communities: Grantmaking Timeline, Eligibility Criteria and Webinars

A few years ago the Investigations Unit at Australian Conservation Foundation noticed coal mines in NSW receiving extensions of up to a decade to legally protect their environmental offsets. It made us wonder: (1) how well protected are offsets in national environmental (EPBC) approvals? (2) Are some industries worse than others? (3) What role does the Department play in this? Our report was released yesterday after years of analysis. We analysed the offsets required in 5 years' worth of approvals and here is what we found: (1) 🌳 Offsets are not well-protected, if at all (2) ⛏ Fossil fuel companies are stand-out poor performers on delay and poor protections... (3) 👮♀ mostly because the Department writes especially poor requirements for fossil fuel companies, and because the Department lets that industry get away with not meeting the requirements more than for other industries. Full report here: https://lnkd.in/gKECfvqd Further info: One in five offsets are not protected at all and a good chunk of these (27%) are related to expired approvals – so they will never be protected. Meanwhile the approved habitat destruction happened and was irreversible 100% of the time. An area the size of K’gari (Fraser Island) should have been protected. About 150,000 ha. Of that, half is not protected, or we could not even locate the offset to check (often the Dept had no idea either). Only a quarter (36,254 ha) is protected adequately. More than two-thirds of cases overall did not require adequate legal protection in the first place. One in three cases involved the Department changing requirements to allow delay. Gas had the lowest adequately protected offsets. Only one in five nature offsets for gas projects are adequately protected. It’s no surprise when you see 89% of gas projects involved weak requirements in the first place. This is significantly higher than for other industries. The gas industry also takes on average close to nine years to protect offsets (much higher than the total average across industries of around five years). Along with coal, it was the industry that enjoyed the most approved delays by the Dept. Coal was the next slowest, with an average of nearly six years to protection. Interestingly, two out of three coal mining cases involved approved delays by the Dept. The average timeframe allowed by the Dept was about 2.5 years overall but for coal it was more than double that. Every single nature offset in our study with more than 10 years of Dept-approved delays was for a fossil fuel project. Compare that with the only ever punishment for delayed offset protection: an infringement notice to Crudine Wind Farm for being a little over a year overdue. Protection was ultimately achieved by the company four years after commencement (which is a better-than-average result in NSW according to the data in this investigation).

#publicservice responsible for #allowing #poor #environmental #protection with lack of supervision of Coal and Oil #miningpractices

As a Junior Environmental Control Officer, it is inspiring to contribute to sustainable construction practices. Every day is a learning experience, driving environmental stewardship and making a positive impact. #Womenincostruction #EnvironmentalControl #EnvironmentalSustainability

The Ontario Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks has again amended the On-site and Excess Soil Management regulations under the Environmental Protection Act, which regulates the reuse of excess soil in Ontario. These amendments aim to clarify existing regulatory requirements, remove barriers associated with reusing low-risk soils, and generally encourage the greater reuse of excess soil in Ontario. The amendments came into effect immediately on April 23, 2024. Read more from lawyers Talia Gordner and Annik Forristal here: https://bit.ly/44pG9jC #regulatory #environmentallaw #mcmillaninsights