What do Stanford, Google, and McKinsey have in common? They’ve all been launchpads for future unicorn founders! For 2,677 founders of 1,076 US-based VC-backed unicorns, we tracked where they worked before striking out on their own. Here's what we found: 🔹 These founders came from 6,109 unique organizations, but only 33 entities employed 15 or more unicorn founders. 🔹 Nearly half (45%) of these top 33 institutions were backed by venture capital at some point in their journey. 🔹 Most (73%) of these places are for-profit companies, including giants like Google (105 founders), Microsoft (73), and IBM (56). 🔹 Universities make up 12% of the sample, with Stanford (60 founders), MIT (52), and Harvard (33) leading the way. (Note that we count only employees here, not graduates.) 🔹 6% of the institutions are banks, such as Goldman Sachs (27 founders), and another 6% are government organizations such as NASA (19 founders). 🔹 One VC fund made the list: Flagship Pioneering (20 founders). 🔹 88% of these organizations are American, 67% are publicly traded, and 42% are in Big Tech. 🔹 Perhaps surprisingly, just 36% of them appear on the Forbes Top 100 employers list. I find many of these results surprising, so I will explore the results more and report further discoveries here! Thank you to the Stanford University Graduate School of Business Venture Capital Initiative team for spearheading this research. Note: Most of the work experience data comes from founders’ LinkedIn profiles. Internships, part-time positions, and periods of study are excluded. For the 1,110 unicorns in our dataset, there are 2,987 unique unicorn founders, who worked at 5,763 unique organizations prior to founding their unicorns. Only 56 institutions among those have more than 10 unique founders. Did you find this post interesting? I post unicorn-related insights several times a week. Follow me, Ilya Strebulaev, to stay tuned. #stanford #stanfordgsb #venturecapital #startups #innovation #technology #theventuremindset
Is the Harvard number supposed to be 41 or 31?
It’s impressive that you don’t need to be a student at Stanford, MIT, or Harvard. Simply working there is sufficient, since this figure counts employees only, not graduates, and for that matter, not the dropouts either. It would also be interesting to see this normalized by employee count — companies like Google employ nearly 200K people, while Harvard employs around 20K, an order of magnitude fewer. National military service is mandatory for Israeli citizens over the age of 18, so a significant proportion of a country with a population of 9 million has worked for IDF at some point in their lives. These are not apples to apples comparisons.
Wow, the IDF is in fourth place, that's amazing and impressive!
That’s a cool statistics 📈 if you didn’t get to Stanford, you can work in Google and become a successful founder, right Emil Bayazitov and Victoria Blinova?!?
Although such companies 🦄 do not represent the entire high-tech eco-system, it's interesting to see where wild unicorns grow. I wonder if you collect information about hi-tech companies that are not unicorns? Just for comparison
Unless I’m mistaken, no Boston Consulting Group (BCG) here, but there’s Bain & Company and McKinsey & Company
Very insightful report Ilya Strebulaev! Incredible to see IDF make it to the Top 5!
Absolutely fascinating . 🙏 for sharing. The best part for me 👉 “One fund made the list” flagship pioneering . Did u by any chance compare this fund performance vs the rest? I am now very 🧐 so need to check them out
Advisor at DDR&D, Mafat For Startups | Founder & CEO, Genesis Accelerator | TheMarker 40Under40
4moGreat to see the IDF make it to the Top 5!!