Inodash’s Post

https://lnkd.in/g-2gTi3S In a landmark decision, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google has violated US antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly in the search and advertising markets. This is a significant victory for the Department of Justice, underscoring Google's dominance in "general search services" and "general search text advertising." While the ruling marks an essential step towards fostering competition and innovation, the future implications for Google's business practices are still to be determined. Potential outcomes range from mandated changes in their business practices to a possible breakup of their search operations. Google plans to appeal, but this decision sets a critical precedent for other tech giants facing similar scrutiny, including Amazon, Apple, and Meta. Bring on SearchGPT! Such a search engine could potentially offer more intelligent, personalized, and efficient search results by understanding and processing natural language queries more effectively than traditional search engines. #Antitrust #TechNews #Innovation #Competition

A U.S. court declared Google a #monopolist, ruling its practice of paying to be the default search engine breaches antitrust laws. This decision challenges Google's 90% dominance in American search queries and could lead to significant changes in the tech industry. Competitors like Apple and AI-powered search engines such as upcoming OpenAI SearchGPT may benefit, offering advanced alternatives as users reconsider their default choices. However, OpenAI must avoid monopolistic behaviors themselves to prevent regulatory scrutiny by ensuring transparency, data privacy, and fostering competition. This decision marks a major victory for the Department of Justice against #bigtech dominance. Implications for corporate boards are to proactively address compliance with antitrust and competition #laws, delicately balance and prioritize #faircompetition, ensure to #diversify #partnerships and #ecosystems, and guide their companies to #innovate. How do you ensure your business practices promote fair competition and innovation while avoiding actions from you or dependent partners that could be perceived as monopolistic? #strategy #ecosystem #innovation (https://lnkd.in/dHcPsEy6)

Today, Google was found to have violated antitrust laws in online search. Here's what you need to know: 🔸 Google is confirmed as a monopolist in the online search market. 🔸 Google used exclusionary agreements and payments to maintain its monopoly, paying companies like Apple and Samsung to keep Google as the default search engine. 🔸 The court found Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act by maintaining its monopoly through anticompetitive means. 🔸 These practices prevented competitors like Bing and DuckDuckGo from competing effectively. 📚 The AI Policy Newsletter: https://lnkd.in/eS8bHrvG 🔗 Link to NYT Article: https://lnkd.in/etxxB7VE 🔗 Link to Ruling Draft: https://lnkd.in/ehU2Jyww #AIpolicy #ArtificialIntelligence #TechPolicy #AIGovernance #antitrust

With recent allegations of Sherman Act violations, Google's dominance in the tech world is under intense scrutiny. New on our blog this week, we unpack how these accusations could potentially reshape the digital landscape. 💻 #ShermanAct #Google #BigTech #DigitalPrivacy #TechNews #Regulation

🚨 Major Antitrust Ruling on Google Search 🚨 The legal landscape around Big Tech is evolving rapidly, and Google's dominance has recently become a point of contention. A recent ruling highlights the ongoing concerns about monopolistic practices that could be stifling innovation, and sets a precedent for the regulation of tech giants. ✨ Key takeaways: - The Judge ruled that Google violated anti-trust laws, controlling 90% of the #SearchIndustry. - In 2021, Google paid 26.3 billion dollars to maintain dominance. - This investigation was opened by the Trump administration, and a new trial will determine the penalty. How do you think BigTech companies should be regulated to ensure fair competition and equity? Leave your thoughts below! Read the full WIRED article: #HumancentricAI #TechRegulation #Antitrust #Google #AI #Innovation

The US federal court decision in Google establishes a near consensus view among global regulators of #competitionlaw that the most fundamental aspects of the Internet economy are unlawfully monopolised. Search is degraded and AI is not the technology that is likely to disrupt Google's search monopoly. It seems that we need a very different architecture for #digitalmarkets. Can competition law provide necessary solutions?

On November 21, Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, alongside the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and other state attorneys general, proposed sweeping measures to end Google’s alleged monopoly over internet search and restore fair competition for consumers. Proposed Remedies: - Termination of Google’s exclusive search distribution contracts and revenue-sharing agreements. - Mandatory sharing of data obtained through monopoly practices with competitors, under strict privacy safeguards. - Divestiture of Google Chrome, with additional divestments (e.g., Android) if remedies fail or compliance is lacking. - Ban on requiring Google Search or Google AI as default on Android devices. - Empowering publishers to opt out of having their data used in Google’s AI training or Generative AI models. Public Awareness Campaign: Google will fund a campaign to educate consumers on its past misconduct, its illegality, and alternative search engine options. Oversight and Enforcement: A five-member technical committee will oversee the implementation and enforcement of these remedies for the next decade. Context: The proposals follow an August 2024 federal court ruling that Google violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly in online search and search ads. The remedies aim to dismantle Google’s restrictive practices, create a level playing field for competitors, and benefit consumers. Timeline: A hearing to discuss the proposed remedies is scheduled from April 22 to May 2, 2025. Follow Global Regulatory Insights for timely updates on antitrust developments and competition law. #Antitrust #GoogleMonopoly #VirginiaAG #DOJ #DigitalCompetition #ConsumerRights #LegalUpdates #GRI

Some interesting quotes and articles based on the Google antitrust ruling. First the importance of user data in an article from the NYT: https://lnkd.in/eptJtEuR "At every stage of the search process," Judge Mehta wrote, "user data is a critical input that directly improves quality." "Google’s multibillion-dollar default deals ensured that the company had a huge data advantage in search, the government claimed. It also presented studies in behavioral economics that concluded people rarely switched from the automatic settings, even if doing so was not a daunting technical task. Consumer behavior was not forced but strongly steered by the power of defaults." Next up, the potential impact to Apple and Firefox from Fortune. There's a lot of revenue on the line. https://lnkd.in/e3azEr_m "The ruling immediately prompted speculation about the impact to Apple, which receives as much as $20 billion from Google every year in exchange for putting the search engine front-and-center on its iPhones via the Apple Safari web browser. " "And that’s not the case for another partner of Google’s located in the fallout zone of Monday’s ruling: Mozilla, the non-profit tech org that makes the Firefox web browser. According to the Mozilla Foundation’s 2021-2022 financial statement, which is the most recent published, $510 million out of its $593 million in revenue came courtesy of Google’s search payments." "In court, Google countered that its search engine was the leader because it was a superior product; that data was important but clever software was its real advantage; and that its contracts were deals freely entered into by its industry partners. But Google struggled to credibly explain why it paid so much to get preferred distribution if its search software was clearly the best technology. Those payments made sense, the government insisted, to ensure that Google was the winner, with its monopoly entrenched." And here is Bloomberg about Apple shifting to AI and chatbots. https://lnkd.in/eBEXz2dW "Apple is weaving OpenAI’s ChatGPT capabilities into its software and expects to do the same with Google’s Gemini chatbot. Over time, the company could steer consumers toward AI and Siri instead of the web browser. That would give Apple the opportunity to reach new, nonexclusive agreements with AI providers — including Google — that don’t run afoul of the US government.

Nothing surprising here! Calling Google an illegal monopoly seems quite amusing. The global community has allowed it to thrive as a monopoly without sufficient legal safeguards against exploitation worldwide. At Giggr - The Future of Work, we are taking a different approach by empowering individuals with Data Autonomy. Our goal is to provide access to work opportunities and enhance their ability to create and consume. #DataAutonomy #FutureOfWork

Is it lost on anyone that Judge Mehta (read “meta”) is probably the most appropriate surname for a #judge making a decision like this? Jokes aside, Judge Mehta is undoubtedly a distinguished #legalscholar who has confirmed what many of us suspected about #Google's and other big #tech companies' #monopoly behavior, exploitation of #data issues, and more. We’ve all been discussing something in the kitchen, and then ads magically appear on your #Instagram feed… My #European egalitarian sensibilities, shaped by my upbringing, are, of course, offended by this. Yet, my 25 years of living in #America have instilled an appreciation for our system's balancing act. This system allows these companies to achieve such incredible wealth, growth, and tech advancement, partly due to a relatively hands-off #regulatory approach, which can vary significantly from one administration to the next. You don’t see companies like these giants elsewhere, “only in America,” I guess! The next four years will undoubtedly be fascinating, but for now, I'll leave you with the read from The Washington Post on the decision from yesterday's landmark case in DC.