John Taylor’s Post

View profile for John Taylor, graphic

Director of Learning, Teaching and Innovation at Cranleigh School

The Hansard transcript of the recent House of Lords debate on Education for 11 - 16 Year olds (Committee Report) repays careful reading for those reflecting on the future of the curriculum and assessment arrangements. The breadth of consensus and the depth of evidence underpinning this Report is striking. I am in agreement with the proposals of Lord Jim Knight, namely that we should focus on boosting learner and teacher engagement, reducing curricular prescriptivity, aligning learning better with the skills needed for the future and utilising extended project style assessments as part of a richer, broader assessment matrix. The successful development, implementation and expansion of EPQ over the past 15 years provides a helpful route-map for future development. It is significant that this model of innovation does not rest simply on curriculum or assessment reform, but embraces the contributions of ed tech, pedagogy and teacher professional development. It also leaves open the important question of whether change should be driven through restoring teacher trust or using accountability measures - a question we should discuss further. Rosie Clayton Alistair McConville Liz Robinson Phil Avery Sarah Fletcher Philip Holton Becky Francis Elizabeth Kelleher 🇮🇪🇦🇪 اليزابيث الين كاليهر Hayley White Kate Kibler Meredith Reeve Cranleigh School https://lnkd.in/eTvNdhe5

Education for 11 to 16 Year-olds (Committee Report) - Hansard - UK Parliament

Education for 11 to 16 Year-olds (Committee Report) - Hansard - UK Parliament

hansard.parliament.uk

Rosie Clayton

Social Change | Education | Tech | Policy & Government

4mo

a good question John - and the answer is probably both! One leads to the other. You can see how the ingredients are coming together for something akin to what Jim and others were advocating for in this debate… + broader / flexible (and less content heavy?) national curriculum + slimmed down GCSE exams e.g. with fewer papers, on demand assessments in English and Maths  + work experience and enrichment entitlements, with skills embedded + changes to performance measures to incentivise different qualifications uptake, eg including PQs + School Report Card which holds schools to account for a slimmed down set of national standards (as ASCL is proposing). Changes to Ofsted process that result from this + a new Teacher Training Entitlement (100hrs) All cogs in the wheel of change, and teacher / leader empowerment?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics