Joanna Tall’s Post

“Preserving the openness of the Green Belt”- How the All England Lawn Tennis Club plans to destroy Metropolitan Open Land. Do restrictive covenants still count for anything? I live in South West London in a corner blessed with Metropolitan Open Land, a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation as well as being a Historic Park Grade 2. Put simply, this is a park that is an oasis of calm despite being in London, has a beautiful lake, provides space for families to be together and enjoy the simple pleasures in life. It was an absolute life-line during the pandemic to escape to. It is also home to the world renowned Tennis Championships hosted by the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC), which for two weeks of the year bring crowds and festive spirits to the area which we locals all enjoy and celebrate. For years, our beautiful open space and the Championships have co-existed happily with parts of the park even being given over to the AELTC temporarily to allow visitors to queue for tickets and park cars. However, our space is under threat due to the AELTC's planning application to expand its operations onto the golf course lands, with a new 8000 seater and 28m high, 104m wide stadium, 38 open courts, and a number of maintenance depots, player facilities and other structures. The implications of these plans are horrendous from an environmental point of view, including the tearing down of 300 trees, filling the soil with concrete (did you know that 100 tonnes of concrete go into a single “grass court”?), 8 years of lorries removing soil, the list goes on.. As a lawyer, I am most intrigued in how the AELTC think they can simply ignore a restrictive covenant against building on the land? When it acquired the freehold to the land in 1993, the AELTC publicly promised to keep the entirety of the land as open space and entered into restrictive covenants with Merton Council: a) not to build on it; b) not to use it except for recreation and leisure or as open space; and c) to dedicate the lakeside walkway for the public when golf ceased to be played. But: a) the AELTC’s plans include building a 28m high stadium and 10 other ancillary buildings; b) “Recreation and leisure” does not include paying for tickets to watch professional tennis players doing their job; c) golf ceased to be played on 31 December 2022. But no publicly accessible walk around the lake is being created. The AELTC is relying on a legal technicality that, as the lease still subsists, they have no need to comply with the Lakeside Covenant. I would be interested in other lawyers’ thoughts on these plans. The most worrying part is that if these plans go ahead, its also sets a precedent for other Metropolitan Open Lands that are under threat of development. If you wish to help and oppose these plans, please do by going to the Greater London Authority website before 8th June 2024: https://lnkd.in/eA5R8Qzv Thank you

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics