Let me ask you a fun question 👀 If you created content using AI, who holds the copyright to it? Is it you? Is the AI platform you made it on? Is it nobody? Or is it the creator of the data the AI was trained on? Well, whatever answer you do have, chances are, you are probably wrong, and I'm worried this is about to become a 𝐛𝐢𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦. The question of who owns AI-generated content is more than just an academic curiosity—it’s a growing concern that could impact 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬, 𝐛𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬, 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐲. In my latest article, I explore the murky waters of AI and copyright law, examining who might truly hold ownership and the potential consequences for misuse and claims. The lack of clarity has real implications, from the misuse of Content ID systems to disputes over derivative works that can affect musicians, artists, and content creators alike. 𝐈𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐬 to keep up with the rapidly evolving world of AI? Share your thoughts below! 💭 #AI #DataEthics #Future #technology #Law
Kuber Mehta’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
#Genai #ai #LLM #openai Interesting argument here by Bruegel - should we free up Generative AI from the constraints of IP and copyright rules?
Economic arguments in favour of reducing copyright protection for generative AI inputs and outputs
bruegel.org
-
Recently, a new Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act was proposed in Congress, which would mandate companies to disclose copyrighted training data to the US government at least 30 days before model launch or face fines. This addresses concerns about lack of transparency regarding training data, especially its potential infringement on copyrighted materials. If passed, it would give more power to content creators to negotiate their own terms.As this never ending debate continues, share your thoughts in the comments below. #GenAI
-
-
AI and copyright The Copyright Clearance Center states: "AI outcomes are strengthened by reliance on responsibly sourced copyrighted works. CCC is expanding its licenses, including opt-in, voluntary, collective licensing to address market needs regarding the use of copyrighted content in AI systems". So what does this mean for us? This is a complex situation that we are all needing to navigate. CCC has arranged a webinar to explain their stance on this topic - check it out: https://lnkd.in/exU_qsKE
AI Copyright Balancing Innovation with Compliance webcast
copyright.com
-
📚 Legal Wins in AI & Copyright 🚀 AI technology and copyright laws are crossing paths in significant ways. Recently, OpenAI overcame a copyright challenge from two news outlets over training methods, reported by Reuters. A New York judge found the claim lacked evidence of harm, but future amendments might change that. This case sets the stage for emerging legal discussions around AI development and copyright. 🔗 Read More: https://reut.rs/48T89yj #AI #LawAndTechnology #CopyrightLaw
-
-
I help Regional QLD SMEs AUTOMATE Phone Calls using AI. Entrepreneur | Content Creator | Innovator
🚨 Breaking News: AI, Copyright & Licensing 🚨 Are generative AI companies playing with fire? 🔥 A series of recent lawsuits unveils a controversial move—using copyrighted materials without permission! Imagine creating something incredible, only to find it's been used without your consent. Frustrating, right? That's exactly the chaos brewing in the world of generative AI. Here’s what's happening: 🔍 Lawsuits are uncovering the unauthorized use of copyrighted content. 🤖 Generative AI firms are in the spotlight for bypassing permissions. 📚 Intellectual property rights are being hotly debated and challenged. Did you know? An estimated 62% of AI-generated content in some sectors could be violating copyright laws. 😱 My personal take? This could change the landscape of AI development and copyright forever. Holding companies accountable can foster a more ethical and transparent future for AI innovations. What do you think about using copyrighted content without permission? Share your thoughts below! 👇 For more insights, check out this in-depth analysis: [AI, Copyright & Licensing](https://lnkd.in/grs-SDH3) P.S. Your thoughts and engagement could spark the next big conversation. Let’s dive in! 🌟
AI, Copyright & Licensing
copyright.com
-
Artificial Intelligence sure poses a huge risk to the creative workforce of the world. I completely agree with that, but what does that mean for artists and designers? The train has already left the platform, The ship has sailed. ..... So, What can be done about it? My perspective says that we need to adapt to survive Symbiotically integrate the better of AI into our work, try and stay in the market till we can. P.S: Hope the guidelines on how the AI can be trained by the companies be made more strict and only datasets which don't infringe copyright laws should be allowed. Copyright laws should be reimagined in a way to serve the newer times , to safeguard artists and other creatives alike. Btw, down below is the colloseum full of pasta marinara🥲
-
-
We need to be open to a more nuanced debate on AI and copyright. AI models could do so much good, but should not stand unlawful use of someone else's copyright. On Fair Use by Craig Peters https://lnkd.in/dZia3GTa
Getty Images CEO: Respecting fair use rules won’t prevent AI from curing cancer
fortune.com
-
I help business owners get + keep more business by driving more leads 💻, conversions ➡️ + sales💰 using personalized strategies that deliver🚀results + crush your overwhelm/overload🤢for good.
Did you know you can’t copyright anything AI creates for you? That’s really important to know if intellectual property is important in your business. As an example, if you create a deck of oracle cards using art made by AI, you can’t copyright that deck – anyone else can replicate it and there’s little protection for you. If you don’t follow Amber the Boutique Lawyer, you should. She shares great tips including the proper way to put your copyright on your website, emails and original content so you’re protected.
Information Research Professional
3wFrom an IP Standpoint (and, BTW, I'm not a lawyer), it's known that while new, novel, and non-obvious work is patentable it doesn't extend to software (perhaps in the USA, but I believe that's fallen out of favor). So, while copyright could be claimed on AI Software its' patentability is probably suspect. (I'll leave that to the lawyers ;-) New intellectual property doesn't exist in a vacuum, it's a collection of small, individual advancements built on a history of small, individual advancements (and, in some cases, it can break new ground, say, by a Tesla or Edison). When someone claims a copyright or receives a patent they've (presumably) successfully shown distinction from the known art, but can be challenged anytime and overturned by Prior Art. I suspect even if two people were to ask the same task of AI, even to the same AI Engine pre-trained the same way, each would generate a new result having some distinction from the other. And, perhaps, each could claim copyright and be subject to the same prior art challenge. The problem I see is that unlike traditional IP the potential database of AI-generated work product could be infinite, making any challenge (ahem) "challenging". Perhaps AI would help ;-) Just my 2 cents ;-)