Unpopular opinion: Early-stage startups should limit themselves to 3 marketing channels max for their first 10 customers 🤔 → Here's why I think differently: ➾ Focus beats fragmentation. Mastering one channel at a time yields better results than spreading yourself thin. The variable to customers not working with you should be because of your product, not because of how you approached them. ➾ The Bullseye Framework (Gabriel Weinberg🙌) isn't just a fancy term. It's about finding that one channel that outperforms the rest. But you can't hit the bullseye if you're aiming at 10 targets simultaneously. ➾ Your audience isn't everywhere. They have preferred hangouts. Your job? Find those spots and show up consistently. ➾ Quality always beats quantity. Doing three channels right beats doing ten poorly every single time. (not sure if you are doing this? Check the footer of your website. How many social channels are you directing people to that have 0 activity on them) ➾ Resource reality check. Early-stage usually means limited resources. Invest them wisely in channels you can truly own. Remember, it's not about your own preferences and social bias. It's about where your audience is and how you can build real relationships with them. What's your take? Have you found success by focusing on fewer channels (growth stacking) or do you prefer casting a wider net (growth hacking)? #b2b #startup #growthstacking
100% agree and I think, for some businesses, it’s a good plan beyond your first 10 customers too.
Tested Strategies for Startup Traction
2moDonatas Jonikas, PhD Fausta Pavesio Alise Gurenko Viesturs Sosārs Milda Vilčinskaitė Annika Ljaš Eilat Jonathan Hedger Stuart Prestedge Filip Ilić Donatas Šumyla Dave Kashen Dasha Kichuk Mariia Tintul Rohan Chaubey M Wallace Green Mindaugas Bruzas Gilles DC 🎯 Pawel Maj Indrek Põldvee Martyna Krasauskaitė Andra Bagdonaite Vytautas Černiauskas Simona Ry would love to hear your expert opinion on this 🙌