Publius: The Journal of Federalism’s Post

In his new article for the Annual Review of American Federalism, Jonathan Obert examines the fragmented and varied regulatory, cultural, and electoral responses to guns and gun rights in the contemporary United States. He argues that these responses a result of two long-standing features of American political life: a tradition of armed federalism and a unique, domestically oriented market for small firearms. As a result of the intersection of these two phenomena, the past 150 years have seen the growth of a fragmentary regulatory response to firearms on the part of local, state, and federal jurisdictions; the emergence of an organized national gun-rights movement; and, most significantly, the ascendance of a legal strategy by supporters of gun-rights constitutionalism. Only by examining the historical contingencies of American political institutions and markets does the contested transformation of a “right to bear arms” into gun rights make sense. Read the full article, available ahead of print in Publius: The Journal of Federalism, here: https://lnkd.in/g-zZvaJ6

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics