#2: Understanding Poverty
*References provided at the end for reading ease*
Setting the stage
Picking up from where we left last time, we concluded that a significant impediment to our progress in clamping down on poverty is our inability to define “poverty" properly. We can't fix what we can't define - that'll be shooting mindlessly (and is what we've been doing for decades).
At the root of this challenge are the sources of prescriptions. Most poverty scholars are "scholars" -- few (if any) have personally experienced poverty and worked with poor people (and being an African doesn't automatically license one in any of these domains). Imagine being treated by a doctor who has only completed medical school and doesn’t have residency training and years of experience in practice.
Outside the Ivory Tower of development scholarship, many donors and actors in the development field associate “poverty” with “extreme deprivation.” Yet, this couldn’t be more wrong. The UN defines Extreme Poverty as living on less than $1.90 daily. And there have been many tools, notably IPA’s Poverty Probability Index, to measure progress out of extreme poverty.
In this piece, I will expand on this and help you understand what "extreme poverty is." What challenge is it: chronic or acute? Correctly answering this question is the first and most crucial step in our collective goal to end poverty. Let’s dive in.
“Poverty is Like A Disease”? Or nah?
Christopher Cooper, who grew up in abject poverty and is now a Truman Security Fellow and a Council of Foreign Relations member, penned a brilliant op-ed in Nautilus, “Why Poverty Is Like A Disease.”
I couldn’t agree more.
Medical care is a strong analogy for poverty alleviation: they both help the unwell to get well and the economically deprived to be restored.
To explain extreme poverty, I will borrow from medicine and draw analogies with medical conditions here. And with this, it is therefore important to clarify what kind of disease or condition “poverty” is. Acute or Chronic?
As you can see, extreme poverty is a chronic challenge, not acute. No one “suddenly becomes poor” – extremely poor people are often born into poverty, have a history, and exist in a context. This was my reality and still is the reality for many people in the communities Cocoa360 works with. A disaster like an earthquake or humanitarian crisis would be akin to “acute” poverty.
Now, let’s relate extreme poverty to a chronic condition like diabetes. And then think of someone with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes who is very sick, incapacitated, and can barely do anything. They often have very high HbA1c (blood sugar levels). See the analogy in Table 1 below.
According to current research, we cannot cure type 2 diabetes. Still, people can have glucose levels that return to the non-diabetes range (complete remission) or pre-diabetes glucose level (partial remission). This fact leads us to our analogy equations:
Treating Type 2 Diabetes = managing “Chronic” into remission + reversing “Acute”
Ending poverty = managing EP into remission + reversing or eliminating AP
Ending that “extreme poverty” is analogous to treating the person with Type 2 diabetes with metformin and supporting them to manage it so they don’t relapse back to a prediabetic or diabetic state.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Testing what we’ve learned so far: Cash Transfers
Given our understanding of the types of poverty, what deprivation do you think “cash transfers”(short-term financial assistance without any long-term support structure) address?
Acute Poverty. Bingo!
Cash transfers are, therefore, best classified as “extreme poverty mitigation,” not “extreme poverty alleviation” efforts. Extreme Poverty is a chronic challenge, not an acute deprivation. Cash transfer models work best for acute situations like disaster relief and refugee crises but not chronic challenges like extreme poverty.
Don’t take my word for it. You could also read Mulago Foundation Kevin Starr’s thread and article on this.
Coming Up
So far, we’ve clarified that money isn’t the impediment to poverty alleviation but a lack of proper definitions and approaches. We've also discussed and defined the different types of poverty. Next week, we shall touch on existing approaches and why they haven’t worked (or aren’t working as intended).
Until then.
Links for the "I need proof" squad
IPA’s Poverty Index: Poverty Probability Index
Cooper, 2019 Why Poverty Is Like a Disease - Nautilus
Cave, 1974 Poverty is a Disease - PMC
Chronic versus Acute Care (Figure 1): Acute vs Chronic Conditions
Managing Type 2 Diabetes: Can Type 2 Diabetes Be Reversed?
Kevin Starr’s thread and article:
Cash Transfers (Figure 2) The Effectiveness of Cash Transfers
Managing Director, Private Institutional Client Advisor | Taking an institutional approach, to generate sophisticated and differentiated investment and capital markets-based solutions.
9moHaving spent a large part of my childhood in Liberia the attempt to shine and smart compassionate eye on the fundamental forces holding humanity back is deeply appreciated.
Customizing software solutions for small businesses
1yInsightful (perspective)
Lecturer in Economics, Finance, and Data Science in Economics and Finance.
1yPoverty is a relative word...sort of, like tall.
MPhil in Development Studies/ University of Cambridge/Cambridge Trust Scholar/Commonwealth Scholar
1yWell written sir. Great piece. We cannot eradicate what we don’t fully understand. It’s time for the poor to tell their own stories to help device context specific approaches in dealing with poverty. I have always said that the world m, particularly these global institutions keep dealing with the symptoms of poverty rather than the root causes. It’s sometimes ridiculous to hear these mantras on eradicating poverty by renowned institutions. Just waiting for your next submission .
Senior Programs Officer |Churches Health Association of Zambia|
1yWell written, a good read indeed.