Decoded: ISI(Inter-Services Intelligence)'s Kashmir to Global Intelligence Operations
"Kashmir remains a focal point of the ISI's operations, serving as a battleground where regional ambitions and global strategies intersect."

Decoded: ISI(Inter-Services Intelligence)'s Kashmir to Global Intelligence Operations

"From the Cold War to the modern-day, the ISI’s influence in Kashmir has evolved, reflecting both shifting geopolitical landscapes and persistent regional tensions." — Daniel Benjamin and Steven Simon

Decoding the ISI’s Complex Web and Its Kashmir Links

The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of Pakistan has long been a subject of intense scrutiny and speculation, especially regarding its role in the Kashmir conflict. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the ISI's operations, its connections with various militant groups, and its intricate relationship with Kashmir.

Stay tuned for our next detailed analysis titled "Decoded: The Hurriyat and Kashmir Conflict," which will be available on Reshi Notes. Subscribe to Reshi Notes to get this and more insightful content delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe Now: Reshi Notes


The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency of Pakistan is one of the most enigmatic and controversial intelligence organizations in the world. Established in 1948, ISI's role and activities have been central to many significant geopolitical events over the decades. This article delves into ISI’s history, its relationships with global powers, its involvement in various controversies, and its role in regional conflicts.

Origins and Overview

The ISI was founded in 1948 as Pakistan’s principal intelligence agency, tasked with gathering and analyzing information, conducting covert operations, and supporting national security objectives. The agency's operations span domestic intelligence, counter-terrorism, and foreign intelligence.


ISI and U.S. Relations

Cold War Collaboration

During the Cold War, the ISI established a strategic partnership with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of the United States. This collaboration was particularly notable during the Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989), where the ISI and CIA jointly supported anti-Soviet groups. Key figures in this alliance included Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s Hezb-i Islami and Jalaluddin Haqqani’s Haqqani Network. This cooperation was crucial in mobilizing resistance against Soviet forces and was marked by shared intelligence and logistical support.

Post-9/11 Cooperation and Tensions

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the ISI’s role became more complex. The agency was involved in efforts to capture or kill high-profile Al-Qaeda leaders. Pakistan claimed responsibility for the arrest or death of around 100 top-level Al-Qaeda operatives. However, the relationship between the ISI and the CIA was fraught with tension. U.S. officials increasingly refrained from informing Pakistani authorities before conducting operations, fearing leaks. Hillary Clinton acknowledged the high-cost Pakistan incurred due to its support of U.S. counterterrorism efforts, highlighting the strained dynamics of the partnership.


ISI and Indian Relations

Accusations of Terrorism

The ISI has faced significant accusations from India, including its alleged involvement in the 1993 Bombay bombings. India has accused the ISI of supporting militant groups engaged in insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen. These allegations have further strained India-Pakistan relations and have been a major point of contention in diplomatic discussions.

Proxy Warfare

The ISI is believed to have utilized militant groups as proxies to further Pakistan’s strategic objectives. This has included support for various terrorist and insurgent groups operating against Indian interests. The agency’s involvement in supporting groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed underscores its role in regional conflicts and its strategy of using non-state actors to achieve political goals.


Controversies and Criticisms

Support for Militants

The ISI’s support for militant groups has been a major source of international controversy. The agency has been accused of aiding and abetting extremist organizations to further Pakistani foreign policy and control domestic politics. This includes support for groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which have been involved in high-profile attacks and insurgencies.

Interference in Judicial Matters

The ISI has also been accused of interfering in Pakistan’s judiciary. Reports of abductions, torture, and surveillance by the ISI have led to investigations by the Supreme Judicial Council of Pakistan. These allegations reflect broader issues of governance and institutional integrity within Pakistan.

Attacks on Journalists

The ISI’s involvement in the attacks on journalists has been a significant area of concern. High-profile cases include the murder of Saleem Shahzad, who was reportedly targeted after revealing sensitive information about the ISI. Similarly, the killing of journalist Arshad Sharif, following his criticism of General Bajwa, highlights the agency’s contentious relationship with the media.


Specific Groups and Operations

Hizbul Mujahideen

Formed with ISI support in the 1980s, Hizbul Mujahideen emerged as a significant militant group in Kashmir. The group was created to counter the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front and has been involved in the armed struggle in the region.

Al-Badr

Al-Badr, initially formed in the 1970s to resist Indian-trained Mukti Bahini forces in Bangladesh, evolved into a notable player in regional conflicts. Its creation and operations reflect the ISI’s broader strategy of using militant groups for geopolitical purposes.

Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden

The ISI’s support for Al-Qaeda during the Soviet-Afghan War has been widely documented. Allegations of ISI’s knowledge of Osama bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad have been contentious. While some reports suggest ISI officials were aware of bin Laden’s location, there remains no direct evidence proving official Pakistani knowledge.

Harkat-ul-Mujahideen

Founded by the ISI in the 1980s, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen was designed to combat Indian interests. The group’s activities in the region reflect the ISI’s strategic use of militant groups to further its objectives.

Haqqani Network

The Haqqani Network, with alleged ties to the ISI, has been involved in numerous attacks against Afghan and U.S. targets. The network’s operations and funding are believed to be partially supported by the ISI. Recent Pakistani military offensives have reportedly disrupted Haqqani Network activities, highlighting the shifting dynamics of regional conflicts.


Casualties and Retaliatory Attacks

The ISI has faced numerous retaliatory attacks due to its involvement in counter-terrorism operations. Key incidents include:

  • November 2007: A suicide bomber attacked the ISI office in Rawalpindi, resulting in 28 deaths.
  • May 2009: An assault on the ISI office in Lahore killed 30 people and injured over 300.
  • November 2009: A suicide bombing at the ISI office in Peshawar resulted in 13 deaths.
  • December 2009: An attack on the Multan office killed 8 people and injured 45.


Conclusion

The Inter-Services Intelligence Agency of Pakistan remains a complex and influential player in global intelligence and regional politics. Its roles in supporting militant groups, its controversial relationships with major powers like the U.S. and India, and its involvement in domestic issues have made it a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. Understanding the ISI’s operations and impact provides crucial insights into the geopolitical and security dynamics of South Asia and beyond.

Regards,

Sahil Reshi


📬 Stay Informed and Engaged! 🌐

Want to keep up with the latest insights and in-depth analyses on crucial topics like the ISI's role in Kashmir? Don't miss out on valuable updates and expert perspectives.

🔔 Subscribe to our newsletter today to get exclusive content, detailed reports, and more delivered straight to your inbox. Join our community and stay ahead of the curve!

👉 Subscribe Now

"The ISI’s strategic use of proxy groups in Kashmir is a reflection of its broader strategy to leverage regional conflicts for geopolitical gain." — Grant Holt and David H. Gray

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Sahil Sajad

Insights from the community

Explore topics