External locus of control and self-defeating behaviors in the workplace and in relationships
The Core Concept: External Locus of Control
An external locus of control occurs when individuals attribute the outcomes of their actions to external factors such as luck, fate, or other people's decisions, rather than to their own efforts or abilities. While this outlook can sometimes provide relief in situations genuinely beyond one's control, it can also become a self-defeating behavior, fostering helplessness, inaction, and a tendency to give up in the face of challenges.
Modern research indicates that an external locus of control correlates with reduced motivation, lower resilience, and higher susceptibility to stress and anxiety disorders. For example, studies show that students with a predominantly external locus of control perform worse academically because they attribute their successes or failures to uncontrollable factors rather than their preparation or effort of Control vs. Other Self-Defeating Behaviors
Learned Helplessness
Learned helplessness, a condition in which individuals believe they have no power to change their circumstances, closely aligns with an external locus of control. Both behaviors can stem from repeated exposure to uncontrollable situations. Research by Martin Seligman on learned helplessness shows that individuals in this state fail to take action even when opportunities for change arise, mirroring the inaction seen in those with an external locus of control.
**Example: People who repeatedly face rejection might develop an external locus of control, believing "the job market is too competitive" rather than seeking new strategies to improve their applications.
Procrastination
Procrastination is another behavior linked to external attributions. Individuals who procrastinate often blame external factors like time constraints or distractions, failing to take responsibility for their choices. A study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that procrastinators with an external locus of control often feel overwhelmed by tasks, leading to further delays and a cycle of avoidance.
Example: A student studying for an exam, rationalizing it as "the teacher didn’t cover enough in class," while ignoring their lack of preparation.
Self-Sabotage
Self-sabotaging behaviors, such as negative self-talk or intentionally undermining one's efforts, often reflect a lack of belief in personal agency. These behaviors share roots with an external locus of control by shifting blame away from the individual and onto external circumstances. Research in the Journal of Behavioral Therapy suggests that self-sabotage is often a coping mechanism for fear of failure or low self-esteem, exacerbating feelings of powerlessness.
Example: A person might promote themselves by convincing themselves that "management only promotes favorites" rather than addressing their fear of rejection or lack of confidence.
Catastrophizing
Catastrophizing is a cognitive distortion where individuals imagine worst-case scenarios, often reinforcing an external locus of control. Those who catastrophize focus on uncontrollable external threats, magnifying their sense of powerlessness. Cognitive-behavioral studies suggest that reframing these thoughts can help shift individuals toward a more balanced perspective, mitigating the negative impacts of both catastrophizing and external locus of control.
Example: Someone with a minor illness might progress into something severe, blaming external factors like "bad luck," rather than seeking treatment or healthier habits.
The Role of Mindfulness and Cognitive Restructuring
Mindfulness-based interventions, such as meditation and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), have proven effective in addressing both external locus of control and self-defeating behaviors. By fostering present-moment awareness and challenging unhelpful thought patterns, these approaches encourage individuals to recognize their influence over outcomes. For instance, mindfulness can help individuals with an external locus of control reevaluate their beliefs about personal agency, promoting proactive behavior.
A Balanced Perspective
While an internal locus of content is viewed as ideal, it’s essential to acknowledge the value of external attribution in certain contexts. For example, attributing failure to external factors in uncontrollable situations can protect self-esteem and motivate individuals to focus on what they can influence. Striking a balance between recognizing external influences and taking personal responsibility is key to overcoming self-defeating behaviors.
Conclusion
External locus of control shares significant overlap with self-defeating behaviors such as learned helplessness, procrastination, and self-sabotage. By fostering awareness and introducing evidence-based strategies like mindfulness and cognitive reframing, individuals can shift toward a healthier locus of control, reclaiming a sense of agency and resilience in life’s challenges. Modern research continues to highlight the importance of this shift External
Locus of Control and Self-Defeating Behaviors in Relationships
Relationships thrive on trust, mutual effort, and accountability. When one partner predominantly exhibits an external locus of control, it can lead to self-defeating behaviors that undermine the relationship's health and growth. An external locus of control occurs when individuals attribute outcomes in their lives to external forces such as luck, fate, or other people, rather than their own actions. In relationships, this mindset can manifest as blame, avoidance of responsibility, and learned helplessness, fostering tension, resentment, and even the relationship's dissolution.
The Impact of External Locus of Control on Relationships
An external locus of control can lead to a variety of self-defeating behaviors in relationships:
Blame Shifting
When a partner attributes relationship problems solely to external factors or the other person's actions, they avoid taking responsibility for their role. This behavior can create a dynamic where one person feels perpetually at fault, while the other avoids introspection and growth.
Research Basis: Blame-shifting behavior aligns with findings on external locus of control in relationships. A study by Locus and Rotter (2020) indicated that individuals with an external locus of control are more likely to attribute failures to external factors, which can undermine relational accountability. Additionally, partners who frequently externalize blame tend to foster dissatisfaction and conflict in relationships (Malouff et al., 2014).
Example: Alex and Jamie argue frequently about finances. Alex, who has an external locus of control, consistently blames their financial struggles on Jamie’s spending habits or the economy. Instead of reflecting on their own budgeting skills or suggesting collaborative solutions, Alex reinforces a narrative that external forces are the sole cause of their issues. This behavior prevents productive dialogue and leaves Jamie feeling unfairly blamed and unsupported.
By attributing financial problems solely to external circumstances or their partner's actions, Alex avoids personal responsibility, perpetuating a dynamic of frustration and avoidance of meaningful problem-solving.
Avoidance and Learned Helplessness
Individuals with an external locus of control often avoid addressing conflicts, believing their efforts will be futile. This avoidance can lead to unresolved issues and frustration for both partners. Learned helplessness, where individuals feel powerless to improve the relationship, exacerbates this behavior.
Avoidance behaviors in relationships, especially in individuals with external locus of control, are well-documented. Learned helplessness—a psychological state where individuals feel incapable of influencing outcomes—is often linked to external attributions of control (Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978). This state fosters emotional stagnation, where partners avoid addressing issues due to a perceived lack of efficacy.
Example: Sara frequently feels neglected by her partner, Ben, but instead of discussing her feelings, she assumes, “He’s just not the type to express love,” or “There’s no point in talking about it—it won’t change anything.” Her avoidance leads to unspoken resentment, which slowly erodes their connection.
Sara’s assumption that discussing her feelings will not change the outcome reflects the cognitive trap of learned helplessness. This passivity, noted in studies on relationship dynamics (Knee et al., 2013), contributes to unspoken resentment, which is detrimental to relational satisfaction.
Emotional Withdrawal
Self-defeating behaviors often manifest as emotional withdrawal when individuals with an external locus of control feel overwhelmed by challenges. This withdrawal can leave their partner feeling abandoned or unloved.
Emotional withdrawal, particularly during conflict, is a common response among individuals with an external locus of control. It often stems from a belief that one’s efforts to resolve issues are futile. Gottman and Levenson’s (2000) research on stonewalling—a type of emotional withdrawal—highlighted its role in eroding relational trust and connection.
Example: During a disagreement, Chris shuts down and becomes unresponsive, thinking, “This argument is going nowhere because they’ll never see my side.” By withdrawing, Chris not only avoids resolution but also deepens the emotional distance between them and their partner.
Chris’s behavior of shutting down during arguments mirrors findings that withdrawal undermines the opportunity for constructive dialogue, deepening relational divides. Emotional availability and problem-solving are crucial for maintaining intimacy (Holmes & Murray, 2007).
Overdependence on Partner or External Circumstances
Those with an external locus of control may overly depend on their partner or external circumstances to resolve issues or provide happiness. This dependence can strain the relationship, as one partner carries the emotional burden of maintaining stability.
Overdependence is associated with relational imbalance and dissatisfaction. Studies on attachment styles and external locus of control suggest that overdependence places undue pressure on the partner who is perceived as responsible for emotional regulation (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2016). This dynamic often leads to emotional fatigue and resentment in the partner being relied upon excessively.
Example: Taylor relies entirely on their partner, Jordan, for emotional validation, blaming their own lack of confidence on their upbringing. When Taylor feels insecure, they expect Jordan to “fix” their feelings, saying things like, “If you really loved me, you’d reassure me more.” This dynamic places excessive pressure on Jordan, making the relationship feel one-sided.
Taylor’s overreliance on Jordan for emotional validation and the expectation for Jordan to “fix” their insecurities reflects an external locus of control that diminishes personal responsibility for emotional well-being. This one-sided dependency often contributes to relational strain.
The Ripple Effect of Self-Defeating Behaviors
The self-defeating behaviors associated with an external locus of control can create a toxic cycle in relationships. For instance, blame and avoidance may lead to arguments, which then reinforce the belief that the relationship is doomed due to uncontrollable factors. Over time, this mindset can diminish the Ripple Effect of Self-Defeating Behaviors in Relationships
Self-defeating behaviors, particularly when tied to an external locus of control, do not just impact one partner—they often create a toxic ripple effect that disrupts the overall health of a relationship. The belief that challenges are insurmountable or entirely external not only limits personal growth but also reinforces negative cycles, leading to emotional detachment, distrust, and dissatisfaction.
1. Blame and Avoidance as Catalysts for Conflict
Blaming external factors or one's partner for issues can foster resentment and defensiveness. This blame-shifting creates a dynamic where conflicts are not resolved but rather recycled. Over time, the unresolved tension becomes a persistent undercurrent in the relationship, making future disputes even more volatile.
For instance, when avoidance is introduced into this dynamic, it stifles opportunities for open communication. A partner who consistently avoids addressing problems may inadvertently communicate disinterest or apathy, further damaging the emotional connection. This avoidance contributes to an environment of emotional stagnation, where neither party feels heard or valued.
2. Reinforcement of Negative Beliefs
Repeated patterns of blame and avoidance often reinforce the belief that the relationship’s challenges are insurmountable. This learned helplessness can lead both partners to feel trapped in a cycle of dissatisfaction, fostering a shared pessimism about the future of the relationship. This mindset shifts the focus from what can be changed to why things cannot improve, perpetuating a sense of hopelessness.
Recommended by LinkedIn
3. Erosion of Emotional Intimacy and Trust
When blame, avoidance, and helplessness dominate interactions, they undermine the trust and emotional safety necessary for intimacy. Emotional intimacy thrives in an environment of vulnerability, mutual respect, and accountability. Self-defeating behaviors often compromise these qualities, making it harder for partners to connect on a deeper level.
For example, emotional withdrawal during conflicts can leave one partner feeling abandoned, while the other feels unheard or overwhelmed. Over time, this can lead to emotional walls that block genuine connection, turning what should be a partnership into two parallel, disconnected experiences.
4. Impact on Relationship Satisfaction and Stability
Research shows that unresolved conflict and emotional distance significantly predict lower relationship satisfaction and higher likelihood of separation or divorce (Gottman & Levenson, 2000). Couples caught in a cycle of self-defeating behaviors may find that even small disagreements escalate, further eroding stability and increasing the likelihood of long-term dissatisfaction.
The toxic cycle of self-defeating behaviors doesn’t just affect the relationship—it also has significant implications for the mental and emotional health of both partners. Feelings of powerlessness, frustration, and rejection can contribute to anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem. These emotional struggles can make it even harder to break free from negative patterns, creating a feedback loop where individual and relational issues amplify one another.
Conclusion
The ripple effect of self-defeating behaviors can be devastating, but it is not irreversible. By recognizing and addressing these patterns, partners can build healthier dynamics rooted in accountability, collaboration, and trust. Transforming the toxic cycles that erode relationships into opportunities for mutual growth not only strengthens the bond between partners but also enhances their overall emotional well-being. Relationships flourish when both individuals embrace the power they have to influence their connection for the better.e partnership’s emotional intimacy and trust.
Strategies for Overcoming External Locus of Control in Relationships
Shifting from an external to a more balanced locus of control can help individuals take ownership of their actions and improve their relationships. Several strategies can foster this shift:
Practice Self-Reflection
Encouraging individuals to reflect on their role in conflicts or challenges can help them identify areas where they have influence. Journaling or discussing these reflections with a therapist can be valuable.
Example: Instead of blaming their partner for constant arguments, a person might ask, “What am I contributing to this situation, and how can I change my approach?”
Focus on Collaborative Problem-Solving
Adopting a mindset of collaboration rather than blame fosters teamwork and shared responsibility in relationships.
Example: When faced with financial stress, Alex and Jamie could work together to create a budget, acknowledging that both partners play a role in their financial health.
Challenge Cognitive Distortions
Cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as identifying and reframing distorted thoughts, can help individuals shift their perspective.
Example: Sara might challenge her belief that Ben is incapable of change by recalling instances where he did make an effort to connect, fostering a more balanced view.
Cultivate Emotional Awareness and Communication Skills
· Practicing open communication about feelings and needs can reduce emotional withdrawal and foster connection.
· Example: Instead of shutting down during an argument, Chris might say, “I’m feeling overwhelmed right now, but I want to discuss this later when I’m calmer.”
Focus on Collaborative Problem-Solving
Adopting a mindset of collaboration rather than blame fosters teamwork and shared responsibility in relationships.
Example: When faced with financial stress, Alex and Jamie could work together to create a budget, acknowledging that both partners play a role in their financial health.
Challenge Cognitive Distortions
Cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as identifying and reframing distorted thoughts, can help individuals shift their perspective.
Example: Sara might challenge her belief that Ben is incapable of change by recalling instances where he did make an effort to connect, fostering a more balanced view.
Cultivate Emotional Awareness and Communication Skills
· Practicing open communication about feelings and needs can reduce emotional withdrawal and foster connection.
· Example: Instead of shutting down during an argument, Chris might say, “I’m feeling overwhelmed right now, but I want to discuss this later when I’m calmer.”
Cultivate self-reflection
· Studies on mindfulness and self-reflection (Brown & Ryan, 2003) demonstrate their effectiveness in improving awareness of one’s role in relational dynamics, helping individuals recognize and address their contributions to conflict. Encouraging individuals to reflect on their role in conflicts or challenges can help them identify areas where they have influence. Journaling or discussing these reflections with a therapist can be valuable.
Example: Instead of blaming their partner for constant arguments, a person might ask, “What am I contributing to this situation, and how can I change my approach?”
Cognitive Behavioral Interventions
· Cognitive reframing techniques are effective in shifting from external to internal attributions. For instance, Sara challenging her assumptions about Ben can help create a more constructive narrative, fostering optimism and openness to change (Beck, 2011)· Acknowledging one's role in the conflict is the first step toward breaking the cycle. Partners who take responsibility for their actions create a space for accountability and growth.
· Building Emotional Safety
· Emotional safety is essential for addressing blame and avoidance. Creating a safe environment where both partners can express vulnerability without fear of criticism fosters trust and encourages resolution.
· Reframing Challenges as Shared Goals
· Reframing relationship challenges as shared goals shifts the focus from individual blame to collaborative effort. For example, instead of one partner blaming the other for financial stress, they can work together to create a budget, reinforcing a sense of teamwork.
· Seeking Professional Support
· Couples therapy or individual counseling can be instrumental in breaking patterns of blame and avoidance. A skilled therapist can help identify underlying triggers and teach strategies for healthier interactions.
· Cultivating a Growth Mindset
· Shifting from a fixed mindset—believing the relationship is doomed—to a growth mindset can empower partners to view challenges as opportunities for learning and connection.
· Enhanced Communication
· Communication skills training, such as expressing emotions and setting boundaries, has been linked to greater relational satisfaction (Markman et al., 2010). Chris’s decision to express his feelings rather than withdraw aligns with this research.
· Shared Goals and Accountability
· Research on goal alignment in relationships (Finkel et al., 2017) shows that couples who approach challenges collaboratively tend to build trust and deepen their bond.
Conclusion
Self-defeating behaviors rooted in an external locus of control significantly impact relationships, often leading to blame-shifting, avoidance, emotional withdrawal, and over-dependence. However, research underscores that these patterns can be transformed with intentional self-awareness, accountability, and collaborative problem-solving. By adopting evidence-based strategies, couples can foster healthier, more resilient dynamics, ensuring their relationships become a source of support and growth.
Building Healthier Dynamics
Understanding how external locus of control and self-defeating behaviors influence relationships is critical for fostering healthier dynamics. While everyone may occasionally lean on external attributions, consistently doing so can hinder personal growth and strain connections. By embracing accountability and collaboration, individuals can create a foundation for stronger, more resilient partnerships.
In relationships, growth begins when both partners recognize that they have the power to influence outcomes, even in the face of external challenges. By focusing on what they can control—such as their reactions, communication, and shared efforts—couples can transform self-defeating behaviors into opportunities for connection and progress. for mental well-being and personal growth. If you want more information on this subject you may go to my book: You Deserve To Be Happy at the following link: