How clean is battery electric vehicle?
Michal Sura michsoora@gmail.com
The European Union in its Fit to 55 strategy requires all new cars registered as of 2035 will be zero-emission. Cars account for roughly 12% of all greenhouse gas emissions in EU. Electric vehicles (EVs) produce no direct exhaust or tailpipe emissions and they are an important part of meeting global climate change targets. Although electric vehicles produce no greenhouse gas emissions directly, they run on electricity that is still produced in large part from fossil fuels in many EU countries. The process of manufacturing of EV and its li-ion battery generates CO2 emissions also. It is well known that CO2 emissions are produced during the manufacturing of electric vehicles and their lithium-ion batteries. In the following analysis, we would like to quantify how much CO2 emissions are associated with production of electric vehicles and their batteries and find out after how many kilometers driven is BEV greener than vehicle with internal combustion engine (ICEV)
There exist great uncertainties in the emissions associated with the production of electric vehicles and their batteries, and the figures obtained by different studies vary widely. The same can be said for the emissions associated with the production of internal combustion engines. Various misinformation circulated on social media and in many quasi-scientific articles claim that conventional fossil ICEVs emit less CO2 than EVs due to “hidden” CO2 emissions from electricity generation. There is also a lot of misinformation floating around that the manufacturing process of lithium-ion batteries produces a lot of CO2. In this analysis we are going to refute these myths and show how things is going with CO2 emissions that are associated with production of EVs, their batteries and their operation and the same with their counterparts - ICEVs.
We are referring to individual vehicle CO2 emissions here. It's not very easy to find to how much CO2 is produced during the manufacturing of a medium-sized passenger car with an internal combustion engine.
According to various data from car manufacturers such as Daimler AG and Volkswagen AG (2005-2008), the production of an ICEV is associated with 4 to 6.5 CO2/kg (1), which means that the production of a standard European passenger mid-sized ICEV of the VW Golf type (the curb weight - 1300 kg) is associated with the production of 6000-9750 kg of CO2 emissions.
The scientific work of Chinese scientists states that the production of a medium-sized Chinese passenger ICEV is linked to 9172 kg of CO2 emissions (2). According to the authors of this study, if more recycled steel was used to make cars in China, the amount of CO2 emissions from car production could be reduced. The share of recycled steel used in China is only 11%, compared to 70% in the USA and 56% in the EU, which implies a huge reduction potential.
Thus, according to the proportion of recycled steel used for the production of medium-sized ICEVs in the EU, the estimated amount of emissions associated with its production is 8000 kg CO2, taking into account the results of the studies (1) (2) (Figure1.).
Figure 1.
A result from the Swedish Energy Agency's work estimates that li-ion battery manufacturing emissions are actually between 61 and 106 kg CO2/kWh (3) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
According to the above-mentioned study by Chinese scientists, the amount of CO2 emissions associated with EV production there in China is around 12,000 kg.
As claimed by Volkswagen, the estimated amount of emissions associated with the production of the VW ID.3 model is 6000 kg CO2 (4). This emission value is quite small when we realize that ICEV production is associated with 8000 kg of CO2 emissions. In the case of EV production, more material is required for structural reinforcement due to the heavier weight of the li-ion battery. There are also higher CO2 emission associated with production of electric motor and power inverter. By comparing data from sources (1) (2) (4), we estimated that the production of medium-sized EV (without batteries) in the EU is associated with emissions of 10,000 kg of CO2 (Figure 3.).
Figure 3.
We chose the following two models to compare the lifetime CO2 emissions from vehicle production and operation:
A new ICEV Volkswagen Golf 1.5 eTSI with official emission 130g/km of CO2. Emissions from its production - 8000 kg CO2
A new BEV Volkswagen ID.3 with 48 kWh battery pack and consumption 150 Wh/km (WLTP). Emissions from its production and production of its battery pack are 14000 kg CO2. The calculation of the emissions linked to production of its battery pack is done this way. The average amount of carbon dioxide emitted during the production of a battery pack is between 61 and 106 kilograms per kilowatt-hour. The production of a 48 kWh battery pack is linked to the production of 4000 kg CO2 (∼84 kg CO2/kWh x 48 kWh) (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Now let us calculate after how many driven kilometers the BEV and ICEV will reach the same CO2 emissions.
The equation should be expressed in this form:
14000 + d x eEV = 8000 + d x 0.130 eICE
Where d is a distance when CO2 emissions match in km, eEV is a mass of CO2 emissions produced by EV in kg CO2/km, eICE is a mass of CO2 emissions produced by ICEV in kg CO2/km.
14000 + d x eEV = 8000 + d x eICE
6000 + d x eEV = d x eICE
Recommended by LinkedIn
6000 / d + eEV = eICE
6000 / d = ( eICE - eEV)
The result looks like this:
d = 6000 / ( eICE - eEV)
We will need values of CO2 emission intensity to our calculation. CO2 emission intensity is the amount of CO2 emissions per 1 kWh produced (5) (Table 1.).
Table 1.
Let’s insert Germany’s CO2 emission intensity found in Table 1. into our formula:
d = 6000 / ( eICE - eEV)
eICE = 0.130 kg CO2/km
eEV = 0.469 kg/kWh x 0.15 kWh/km = 0.07 kg CO2/km
d = 100587 km
According to our calculations, the emissions produced by the operation of the BEV VW ID.3 are equal to the emissions produced by the operation of the ICEV VW Golf 1.5 eTSI after driving 100586 kilometers in Germany. After 100586 kilometers, the battery-electric Volkswagen ID.3 will have a lower carbon footprint than the Volkswagen Golf 1.5 eTSI.
Based on the data in Table 1, we calculated how many kilometers BEV VW ID.3 must drive to become greener than ICEV VW Golf 1.5 eTSI in various European countries (see Table 2., Table 3.).
Table 2.
Table 3.
úvodná grafika : pixabay.com
References
Human Capital & IT | Optimizing and automating HR and IT processes | Strategic business consulting | Enterprise Service Management Advisory | itSMF CZ vice-chair | AKT CZ Managing Director
1yI missed something. Why do ID.3 without a battery pack, if it's simpler than Golf, need more CO2 to be produced? 10000 kg vs. 8000 kg, it's 25 % more. Could anyone explain. pls?
Co-founder & Director | IoT Solutions | ALDS Automation | Gas-LPG-CNG-Bio Fuels | Smart Metering -Water, Gas, Energy | Industrial Automation | LoRaWAN, 4G-LTE, NBIoT, BLE | Industry 4.0 | Almost anything in IoT
1yThis is insightful. One more thing, how about battery disposal and after effects?
Green Chemical Engineer
1yI run a ID 3 clone (a Cupra Born) but it takes half its charge in a year from mine and others solar PV so the UK flip over distance would be about 50,000 km before we add in some emissions for the solar PV.
Professor e Pesquisador na Universidade Estadual de Campinas | Palestrante | Consultor | Escritor
1yThe average lifetime mileage of an ICE vehicle is about 133,000 miles (214042,75km). Countries like Brazil as biofuels. If EUROPA really wants to change should go for biofuels. In that case, car d would be at least the whole lifetime. Without changing the recharging infrastructure. Option 1) EU makes partnerships with several countries to produce biofuels. You could help Africa, for example. 2) you purchase batteries or precursors from batteries from China because they already dominate that too.
Geologist | Olympian | Thought Provoker
1yThe real win would be if there could be an EV retrofit, or at the very least plug in hybrid on FWD cars to avoid the entire car reproduction.