How to Do “Prospection”
How might you leverage “prospection” to improve your business?
In researching ideas for our monthly e-newsletter, my Business Development Manager came across the book Tomorrowmind: Thriving at Work with Resilience, Creativity, and Connection – Now and an Uncertain Future, by Gabriella Rosen Kellerman and Martin Seligman. While you might not recognize the name of the first author, the second author may be familiar – Dr. Seligman is a long-time professor at the University of Pennsylvania and the director of its Positive Psychology Center, and is widely known for his best-selling books, Flourish and Authentic Happiness.
Tomorrowmind focuses on five key skills the authors believe are needed to do well in today's workplace, which they term PRISM, and described by Dr. Kellerman in a blog post:
Let's focus on the first of these five skills, Prospection.
Prospection
I found the “Prospection” chapter hard to follow (because the book did not use the principles of effective content layout described in my e-newsletter, How to “Read” a Business Book), so I boiled it down to “Todd-speak” as follows:
For some tips on performing better in both phases, please check out our 4-minute video, Building Your Prospection Muscle.
While I didn't initially like the term “Prospection,” it grew on me once I realized it comprised the second and third phases of every consulting process:
Shortly before learning of Tomorrowmind, I had looked back at an assessment project we did several years ago to see where things currently stood. Here's what I found.
Assessment and Implementation
In 2021, we began working with a client who knew they had a mess on their hands, and needed someone from outside the company to both validate their assumption and develop recommendations to overhaul their accounting function. At the end of the assessment project, we delivered a report with an important diagram – boxes showed key processes and technologies for both the current and future states, and symbols identified which would be eliminated or added by initiatives already in process or by a new accounting system.
Recommended by LinkedIn
As part of our assessment work, we estimated how much time each of the 10 persons then in the department worked on key tasks. Once we had a clear picture of the current state, we then estimated how much employee time would be required to achieve the same – or better – results in the future. Between the operations system replacement already in progress, a new accounting system, and a technology-enabled cash receipts process, we estimated that 3 FTE's (Full-Time Equivalents) worth of work – or about 6,200 hours annually – could be eliminated.
We were then retained for the selection and implementation of the accounting system. Following this, we were asked to extend our work to deliver additional process improvements and technology usage.
How do things stand today, three years later? There are now 8 persons instead of 10 in the department, and they are producing results more quickly and with dramatically fewer mistakes than in 2021. The group's workload decreased because:
Three years ago, we estimated a workload reduction equivalent to 3 FTE's and so far we've achieved a 2 FTE reduction. We expect to see further reductions in two areas:
With an eventual total savings of at least 2.75 FTE’s, I’d say our estimated 3 FTE workload reduction was highly accurate.
How will these additional .75 FTE time savings be used? Handling new requests from the executives for information and analyses not even contemplated in 2021, thereby helping to streamline and improve other areas of the business.
Plan Your Work, and Work Your Plan
Our very accurate time savings estimates were possible because of prospection – we got down in the gory detail of the current state, clearly saw a much-improved future state, listed the tasks needed to get there, used our activity-based current state workload calculations to estimate the future state workload, and distilled all this in our final report.
As I’ve written in the past, a single full-time clerical position has compensation and benefits totaling at least $40,000 per year. (Financially, this is equivalent to paying $40,000 interest per year on an $800,000 loan with a 5% interest rate.) While process and technology improvements seem boring compared to new product offerings or buying a company, “boring” means less risk compared to a failed product launch or merger – and any CFO of a small-to-midsized business would be glad to find savings of $40,000 per year.
How can you achieve results like this client? Begin with prospection – and talk with THA. We can help you objectively envision and map out planned process and technology improvements to achieve results for your business, and then work with you to implement this plan.
Sincerely,
Todd L. Herman