How Easy Becomes Hard: When Logic and Psychology Collide
The more I think about investing (and I think about investing A LOT! 💭), the more I get to a simple punchline:
This stuff is really not that hard and this stuff is really, really hard.
Hard or not hard, though, it’s all too easy to get turned around.
Let's review a few things worth keeping straight.
Past Performance is No Indication of Future Performance
(Logic: Not Hard; Psychology: Hard)
This is more than a regulatory disclaimer that you’ve seen a million times.
This is just a simple reality based on the fact that:
As a result, the winners of yesterday may or may not be the winners of tomorrow.
Now there are good characteristics and bad characteristics that may set up certain countries, companies, or individuals for more or less potential success in the future.
That’s why the expression “I would buy stock in this kid if I could” exists.
Maybe it’s:
Often all of these coming together.
And then you have to contend with the fact that asset valuations matter AND that it's a lot easier to sell something that's done well recently (and thus is newly expensive).
Long way around the block to say:
Next time someone uses the present tense after describing a historical fact about investing (as in “US equities outperform International equities”) to project it forward, you call me.
I have a few words for that person.
Projecting past results forward with unwarranted conviction is a cardinal sin in my world, even though people find near-term comfort in it. Extrapolate at your own risk.
Losing Stings a Lot More than Winning Tickles
(Not Hard)
This needs no explanation.
We’ve all lost, and we’ve all won.
Nearly universally, the sting from losing is unsettling and lasting. 😣
Winning is a quick high that only resets the bar higher. 🎯
This means that, along the way, we should keep an eye to the downside
Equally importantly, we should aim to avoid doing things that have a tendency to turn everyday losing into permanent self-defeat.
Recommended by LinkedIn
In other words, let’s not snatch defeat from the jaws of (eventual) victory.
Only you can do that for yourself.
This means avoiding what investors call “permanent loss of capital” which comes from selling at the wrong time or buying loads of things that can go to zero under reasonable scenarios. That’s permanent defeat.
Complexity Jockeys vs. Simplicity Nihilists
(Hard to Know What Motivates People - But Worth the Effort...)
At first approximation, you can place wealth management “practices” into one of two buckets, at the risk of slight caricature:
At one extreme, the Complexity Jockeys slowly complicate things under the guise of necessity and sophistication:
At the other extreme, you have the Simplicity Nihilists.
The real world operates in the middle, the grey.
Striking the right balance is a challenging task, one that requires clear thinking and the right incentives
NOW THE BIG ONE...
Investing is a Means to an End
(Easy, But You Decide)
When you take the final tally on your life, I doubt “How did I do as an investor?” will rise very high up the list.
Even if you did better than everyone else at moving chips around the table, if the rest of your life sucked and your kids aren’t talking to you, I don’t think it’ll get you very far.
Imagine how crummy you’ll feel if, despite being obsessive about it, you did badly at investing too (which is easy to do).
This is a fundamental thing that both you and I know:
Get the big things right, get most of the small things right too, and accept the occasional rainstorm.
🌧️ That’s how rainbows are created. 🌈
Be well and talk again soon.
Jonathan
🔄 Repost to share with others
👍 Like if this was valuable to you
🔔 Follow to see more of my content: Jonathan Treussard, Ph.D.
Disclaimer: This is purely education, not financial advice. For more information about Treussard Capital Management and fuller disclaimers: www.treussard.com