A Safety Mechanism for Values-Based Leaders (3.5)

A Safety Mechanism for Values-Based Leaders (3.5)

One of the most frequently asked questions posed by the members of the Conscious Business Friends Group during our live teleclasses is, "How does one fix misconceptions when perceptions are wrong?" 

There's a safety mechanism that leaders need to implement when trying to create or lead a Conscious culture. That is the safety that their behavior needs to be "discussable," or considered with possible deviation. If the leaders just do what they say they're doing, there is a possibility that people may not understand, or might infer that they are deviated. And the truth is, that is their inference. They can make that assumption. They don't have all the information, but they could have evidence - and they could be right. The leader might think she is acting properly and some other people might see aspects of the situation that would make her believe she's not acting properly.

So I don't want to start by saying the leader is right and others are wrong, but I also do not want to say the others are right and the leader is wrong. We don't know. There is room for multiple interpretations.

So given that leaders have authority, it is essential that leaders create a feedback loop that encourages people to raise issues with them - not attacking them but inviting them to reflect and explain why they think this action has been a deviation.

For example, imagine the group has a norm which says that no cell phones during meetings unless there are urgent calls. Now imagine the leader receives an urgent call and does not mention to the group that it is urgent, and just answers the phone. If no one says anything, cynicism creeps in. If the leader says "Team, if you ever see me do something at odds with what we're trying to do, please call me on it - let's talk about it." In a way the leader is saying the he or she is not perfect, willing to learn and failable. But what you can trust is that if you show them their mistake, they will listen to you.

That's the essence of creating a culture. You cannot expect anyone to be perfect. The leader is not always right, and we all make mistakes. So asking that standard would destroy every culture. Yet we have as a civilization the standard practice of creating idols and destroying them.

So if someone is a leader, and is asking, "How do I create a culture," you have to define the standard, demonstrate the standard, demand the standard, and delegate the standard. But then you have to provide the safety mechanism by making the standard and your behavior "discussable."

If a leader doesn't do that, and you are working in a company where you are afraid that leaders are not willing to listen to you, it's a judgment call. I cannot recommend that you do it because it may not be safe.

That is why I put the burden on leaders to create an environment of "discussability."

In the video below I have shared these thoughts:

Should you have any difficulty viewing the video please click here to view on Fred's slideshare page.

 


To join my teleclasses where we can discuss relevant topics and have opportunities to engage in coaching, please join the Conscious Business Friends Group and we will update you on our upcoming sessions.

Should you have questions for me, please submit them here. We will continue to surface the most frequently asked questions and provide answers.

Fred Kofman is Vice President at Linkedin. This post is part 3.5 of Linkedin's Conscious Business Program. You can find the introduction and structure of this program hereFollow Fred Kofman on LinkedIn here. To stay connected and get updates please visit Conscious Business Academy and join our Conscious Business Friends group.

Yes. Vulnerability-based trust (does that ring a bell?)

Dr. S. Brett Savage

Executive Coach, Management Training, Senior Mgt. Team Building, Keynote Speaker, Org. Assessments, Performance Management, Enterprise Competencies, Consulting.

8y

Fred, you're touching on some of the great thinkers and leaders lives in adopting a non-victim mentality to life. Congratulations, you are one of a few but not alone!

Fred Kofman, very, very powerful: "Yet we have as a civilization the standard practice of creating idols and destroying them." An with that, I must seclude myself to ponder.

Like
Reply
Catharine Lindsay

Community association management, telecommunications and general management careers - looking for the next adventure

8y

During meetings people should be allowed text messages? If there's a reason to have a meeting then the focus needs to be on the meeting. Setting aside technology for the duration of a business related conversation is a must. Doing less shows disrespect for the others in the room and a lack of commitment to the discussion. If we want to ensure that all involved are invested, then all involved have to be paying attention. The other side of that is ensuring that the purpose of the gathering is necessary, organized and only as long as necessary. It's a tough sell but not everything about previous business models was wrong. If we're working towards an environment where there's a natural balance in communications and investment in company success, we have to be able to focus and bring all our skills to a laser point review of issues, solution and success.

Like
Reply

We are bent to think that one cause leads to one effect and that “the whole universe” is a blank paper sheet. Our perception is restrained to see only what fits with our single particular view. Sometimes, we use to ignore facts and events located just in front of our eyes; we disregard lot of relevant information. We abuse of simplification! But we know that cause and effect inter-are. Every effect becomes a new cause and they are immersed in a sea of many other cause-effect pairs. For better or worse, we know other causes from the past will impact in the particular effect we are interested in. We also know that future causes may also impact on the particular effect we care. We realize that our analysis will be obsolete soon. Being aware we are seeing only a tiny part of the whole “iceberg of reality” our mind is obliged to a more open view. Thanks for reading! Alejandro

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics