HumanDebt™ by Elon Musk
Everyone is familiar with the now-famous Elon email asking his employees to physically come back to the office and the reactions to it are many and very interesting.
While most people are in shock and rightfully rolled their eyes, there are some defending him. The main argument is that he can do whatever he chooses as he is the owner of the place and what he says, for whatever reasons - goes. While this is very true, it doesn't mean it makes his stance right or ethical.
Obviously, Tesla employees like anyone else, have a choice to simply leave if that doesn’t suit their lifestyle and many will. In fact, there’s a bevvy of reactions asking them to come on over with the most hilarious coming from AWS where Zafar Choudry said “If the emperor of Mars doesn’t want you, I’ll be happy to bring you over”.
Aside from how taking this stance publicly, is in my opinion, irresponsible as it validates the drones of command&control execs that are still too fearful to let people truly choose, it is also irrational and unbecoming of someone we have collectively decided to call a visionary. He is not only building HumanDebt™in Tesla but elsewhere that listens too.
The POC of “Look, we can work from our homes and be as if not more productive” that Covid inadvertently gave us is precarious, it is in a direct and constant fight with the command and control set point of old-style management. It goes against the nature of the micro-managers and the small thinkers and there are more of them than not. We can’t allow rhetoric that could have easily been written on a whim or after a couple of pints or edibles to set us all back so we must ignore it.
In my view, the worst thing about it is the complete and utter disregard for the lives of the Tesla employees and how it sends a clear “you are not truly valuable to me so off you go to AWS if you liked” message. Nothing would make me feel more unimportant as an employee than having my leader saying he doesn’t care about my wellbeing and that, he’s well aware this position will possibly push me into leaving but he’s fine with that.
It’s arrogant, tone-deaf, misguided and potentially bankrupt. There is no other way to interpret it. Even the title of it “To be super clear” - what does that say?
Then he claims that if he hadn’t been visible on the factory floor at all times then they would have long ago gone bankrupt. That’s sad for Tesla really if it needs Elon’s actual image to keep people working. Perhaps he could have some giant posters of himself commissioned so he ensures people are productive? There’s a free tip.
"The more senior you are the more visible must be your presence" - is incredibly deluded, small-minded and really quite sad.
Recommended by LinkedIn
He goes on to say “There are of course companies that don’t require this, but when was the last time they shipped a great new product? It’s been a while”. Which is insane. No other company produced anything else of value and that’s because their people were not physically together?!? If nothing else, consider the amazing work pharma has put in to create the Covid vaccines - guess what - the vast majority of them were working remotely.
Has he not been paying attention? Every study out there shows that people were beyond productive while WFH, there’s zero substantiation to his stance.
I put it to all of us that perhaps Elon sent this purely for the value of the shock, for the fun of being in the public controversy but he will undoubtedly lose employees en masse not for the demand necessarily, but the careless and devaluing tone so no, they won’t be making “the most exciting and meaningful products of any company on Earth”.
This will end up costing him precisely that vision and while he may retract, backtrack or simply choose from a limited pool of professionals that don’t mind the physicality and the lack of respect, 20-30 years down the line when history looks back it will see this moment of temporary insanity as one of the reasons Tesla never reached its potential. What about you, can you afford to joke around?
Just because he’s Elon it doesn’t make him intangibly right and on this one, he is so wrong it will cost him. Unfortunately, it will cost others too. I for one, after this, want none of the “most exciting and meaningful products on Earth” he’s peddling, I’d rather buy the same vehicle from companies that let their best value feel appreciated and cared for so they’re at their most performant.
—————————————————————————
The 3 “commandments of Psychological Safety” to build high performing teams are: Understand, Measure and Improve
At PeopleNotTech we make software that measures and improves Psychological Safety in teams. If you care about it- talk to us about a demo at contact@peoplenottech.com
To order the "People Before Tech: The Importance of Psychological Safety and Teamwork in the Digital Age" book go to this Amazon link
Experienced senior executive and management consultant
2yMany people don't seem to get the situation right. It appears that you (Duena Blomstrom) are among them. This has NOTHING to do with 'command and control' or 'old-style management'. It can only be seen as such by old-style management thinkers. Your article and all comments are, actually very true. I would not hesitate and agree with them and support every word - IF - it was written about Ford, General Motors, or any other great company out there. But this is not 'just another car company' neither is it another manufacturing (or technology) company. The organisation in question is on a mission to exceptional goals and that requires exceptional approaches and exceptional people. People, from whom Musk expects commitment and sacrifice equal to his own (he doesn't 'lead form behind' or from behind the glass of a top-floor corner office). Remember the recruitment advert of Ernest Shackleton for his South Pole expedition: " Men wanted for hazardous journey. Low wages, bitter cold, long hours of complete darkness. Safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in event of success. " Go apply your article (and entire Psychological Safety doctrine) to that iconic case? I think Musk's expectations are today's equivalent.
Leadership Navigator - Guiding you through tricky terrain as you’re pulled by vision and pushed by others’ pain | Leadership Coach | Neuroplastician | Business & Culture Change
2yDoes Elon Musk recognize how hypocritical he's acting in this message to Tesla employees? Can Musk really be spending 40 waking hours in his Tesla office when he's also the head of two other companies and maybe a third with Twitter? Also, Tesla has stakeholders other than employees, such as customers and suppliers. Shouldn't some execs be focused on them, which could mean time out of the office? Why is he so intent on leading in a command-and-control manner? And to think so many people idolize him...
Director of Environmental Compliance and Safety |Learner |Analytical |Individualization |Ideation |Responsibility
2yMaybe I am wrong, but this feels like a one-sided position that is missing context, and here is my Why: - I absolutely agree this will impact "remote workers", but there will also be an impact on physical front-line workers. Although brisk in its tone, his statement suggests equality in value to the physical front-line worker. -I think there is just as likely a condition where the physical front-line worker felt less than in value prior to this statement, as much as was perceived by the "remote worker". - How many of these "remote workers" are in the management/leadership chain? The workplace is a relationship and they do not foster well in the absence of being present. It is almost impossible to manage and lead without direct engagement and truly knowing your people. Has there been a comparative study done on connectedness, and subordinate employee support, in the remote and the in-office worker with similar duties? - In my experience, a healthy workplace involves all not some, and workplace culture is local not distant. I am not validating his statement, no more than I can assume what lead to it.
Program Coordinator at TalkingTrucks.co.za
2yI fail to understand why so much attention is given to this guy!
Retired-Vice President - Global Technology - Materials and Process Engineering at Oshkosh Corporation
2yNo matter how much people would like to work from home, employees are more productive working together, engaging one another face-to-face. If you are in a leadership role, your production employees need to be on site, and it is critical for them to see that you are also on site working as a team to achieve a common goal. Remote work is fine for certain coding responsibilities, but when it comes to leadership it is disrespectful to lead from home via Zoom.