The Inflated Agrifood Value Chain: Who Really Wins?

For years, I’ve wondered: why do the two groups at the very ends of our food system—farmers and consumers—remain locked in economic frustration, while everyone in between reaps the rewards? On one side, farmers struggle to make ends meet, perpetually underpaid for their labor; on the other, consumers watch prices climb ever higher, forced to swallow unjustifiable costs. Call me naive, but something about this picture feels fundamentally wrong.

The global agrifood supply chain has grown into a tangled web of intermediaries. Between the smallholder farmer who grows our food and the consumer who buys it, there are countless steps. Many of these steps add extra costs without delivering real value, pushing up prices while failing to improve quality or nutrition. For farmers, it means tight margins and financial uncertainty. For consumers, it means overpaying for products that may not even be good for their health. For the environment, it means unnecessary transportation, packaging, waste, and resource depletion.

Instead of simpler systems where farmers and consumers connect more directly, we have lengthy chains that make it hard to know where our food comes from or how it was produced. Unnecessary intermediaries profit from marketing spins and inflated prices, leaving farmers underpaid, consumers disappointed, and everyone confused about what’s really on the plate.

Real Consequences for Everyone

Smallholders operate in volatile markets, often forced to accept low prices. Consumers face higher costs and limited nutritional benefits. The planet suffers from overuse of resources and rising greenhouse gases due to long-distance shipping and excess packaging. Public health declines as ultraprocessed foods, stripped of essential nutrients and packed with additives, dominate our diets.

Where Does Nutrient Value Disappear?

1. Refined Grains: Milling whole grains into white flour removes fiber, vitamins, and healthy oils, reducing their natural goodness.

2. Canned Vegetables and Fruits: High-heat processing can degrade vitamins and minerals, so the end product delivers fewer health benefits.

3. Overly Processed Meats: Excess sodium, preservatives, and flavor enhancers replace quality nutrients, shifting the balance away from what’s naturally beneficial.

Harmful Chemicals in Agriculture

Long, profit-driven supply chains also encourage the use of chemical inputs—pesticides, herbicides, and synthetic fertilizers—to maximize yields cheaply. When the primary goal is volume and shelf life, rather than nutritional quality, farmers may feel pressured to rely on chemicals to meet industry demands. This can degrade soil health, harm beneficial insects and wildlife, contaminate water supplies, and ultimately yield foods with lower nutrient density. Shorter, more transparent supply chains can reduce this pressure. When consumers demand quality and transparency, farmers gain incentives to adopt sustainable farming practices, cutting back on harmful chemicals and improving long-term soil fertility, biodiversity, and overall ecosystem health.

Using Innovation and Shorter Chains

By shortening supply chains, we can tap into modern tools—e-commerce, advanced cold storage, and direct-to-consumer platforms—to reduce middlemen. This shift supports better prices for farmers, fresher products for consumers, and more efficient use of energy and resources. Local food hubs, community-supported agriculture (CSA) initiatives, and microprocessing centers create stable jobs, foster healthier environments, and encourage eco-friendly distribution methods.

Transforming Industrial Processing

Industrial processors often focus on shelf life, convenience, and profit margins. By refocusing on healthier, minimally processed foods, they can:

- Create new, skilled jobs aimed at quality, nutrition, and sustainability.

- Drive innovation in healthier food and beverage ingredients.

- Potentially reduce diet-related diseases, easing strain on healthcare systems.

- Offer products that rely less on harmful chemicals in their supply chain, promoting cleaner, more sustainable agriculture.

Rethinking Convenience

Ultraprocessed foods owe their dominance partly to our preference for convenience. But this convenience feeds a system that profits from additives, marketing hype, and environmental damage. By choosing fresher, simpler alternatives, we can improve our health, support fairer supply chains, discourage harmful agricultural chemicals, and foster a thriving environment. A small step away from convenience can yield long-term benefits in well-being, flavor, and ecological stability.

Potential Impact on Retail Chains

Existing retail chains may face short-term challenges as direct sourcing and local models gain popularity. They may need to adapt by offering fresher, healthier, and more transparent products. Doing so could strengthen their reputation, win consumer trust, and open new markets. Retailers who embrace this shift can remain competitive, finding their place in a fairer, cleaner, and more sustainable food future.

A Healthier, Fairer Future

Real change requires everyone’s involvement. Consumers, farmers, policymakers, businesses, and retailers must work together to shorten chains, improve processing, demand transparency, and encourage sustainable farming. By building a system that values real quality over inflated costs, we can enjoy tastier, more nutritious meals, ensure fairer earnings for farmers, reduce harmful chemical use, and leave a healthier planet for future generations. It all starts by recognizing the costs of our current model—and choosing to do better.

Many businesses are hesitant to promote development models that shorten supply chains and prioritize environmental, social, and health benefits because doing so can challenge their established profit structures and practices. The current system, with multiple intermediaries and complex logistics, is often designed to maximize margins for the companies in the middle. Here are a few key reasons why businesses might resist change:

1. Short-Term Profit Focus:

Businesses often operate under pressure to deliver immediate financial returns to shareholders. Investments in retooling supply chains—such as reducing intermediaries, adopting sustainable practices, or developing healthier products—may not pay off quickly. The status quo, even if inefficient and inequitable, is usually more predictable, allowing companies to manage risk and maintain steady profits in the short term.

2. Complexity and Inertia:

Today’s sprawling supply chains are the product of decades of optimization geared toward volume, consistency, and low-cost inputs. Overhauling these entrenched structures is complex, requiring new technology, rethinking procurement policies, and often retraining staff. Many companies find it easier to continue on the familiar path rather than navigate the complexities of changing the entire system.

3. Market Perceptions and Consumer Habits:

Businesses may worry that making significant changes—such as sourcing more locally, cutting additives, or increasing transparency—could mean higher costs or require educating consumers about why higher prices might be justified. If consumers are not fully on board, companies risk losing market share. Traditional marketing often banks on convenience, familiarity, and brand recognition rather than health and sustainability, so shifting the message and approach can feel risky.

4. Pressure from Stakeholders:

Corporate boards and large investors typically seek stable and growing returns. They may see the costs involved in building shorter supply chains or focusing on sustainability as limiting their ability to scale up, use inexpensive inputs, or easily adjust product lines. Without strong incentives or regulatory pressures, businesses often find it more comfortable to continue with business as usual.

5. Lack of Clear Industry Standards and Policies:

In the absence of strong, industry-wide guidelines, transparent labeling requirements, or supportive government policies, many companies see little reason to voluntarily change. Unregulated markets allow businesses to continue capitalizing on the old model without feeling compelled to invest in more responsible, equitable supply chains.

In essence, businesses resist promoting more sustainable and equitable development models because they can appear complex, less profitable in the short run, and uncertain. Without clear incentives, supportive policies, and strong consumer demand for change, many companies prefer to stick to established, profit-driven supply chain practices.

There’s an understandable concern that shortening supply chains and cutting out unnecessary middlemen will reduce the total number of businesses involved, as well as overall profit margins. In fact, that’s part of the goal: to eliminate activities that add no genuine value, just cost and complexity. However, this doesn’t mean businesses are doomed. Instead, they can lean into innovation—broadly defined, not just technical—to carve out roles that are genuinely valuable and more aligned with the future of food.

Reimagining Roles and Value Propositions

Rather than serving as mere pass-through entities, businesses can position themselves as enablers of transparency, trust, and quality. This could mean curating local products and ensuring authenticity, or helping educate consumers about where their food comes from and why it matters. By offering services that enhance understanding, improve logistics efficiency, or ensure better food safety standards, businesses can create new forms of value that go beyond simple markup.

Building Stronger Brands and Communities

When margins on “empty” services shrink, the incentive grows to build real relationships with customers. Brands can invest in storytelling—highlighting the growers, the regions, the cultural heritage of foods—and in tangible improvements such as fair pay for farmers or eco-friendly packaging. This brand-building creates customer loyalty based on shared values, not just low prices. Over time, this can result in stable, long-term relationships that are more resilient than the razor-thin margins found in commoditized, opaque supply chains.

Focusing on Service Innovation

Innovation isn’t limited to new machinery or software. It includes reorganizing processes, rethinking logistics, and restructuring the way information flows. For instance, a business might focus on consolidating orders from small farms and ensuring timely deliveries to local retailers or restaurants, adding value by smoothing out the connection between producers and end-users. Others might specialize in food education, nutrition consulting, or community-based events that bring farmers and eaters together. These services add genuine value to the chain, rather than just inflating costs.

Leveraging Transparency as an Asset

With shorter, more transparent supply chains, businesses can stand out by certifying product quality, authenticating the origin of ingredients, and verifying sustainability claims. By acting as trustworthy gatekeepers or quality assurance partners, they provide a necessary service. This shift could turn some of today’s “unnecessary” intermediaries into valuable certifiers, data analysts, or advisors who help maintain the integrity of the food system.

Emphasizing Efficiency and Sustainability

Where technical innovation does come into play, it might not be about complex machinery but rather about improving communication and coordination. Simple digital tools can reduce waste by better predicting demand, or help farmers know the best times to harvest and deliver. As costs drop and prices stabilize through efficiency gains, businesses that facilitate these improvements become essential partners in the chain.

From Exploiting Complexity to Championing Clarity

Ultimately, existing businesses can evolve their roles. Instead of thriving on complexity and markups, they can thrive on clarity, customer satisfaction, and meaningful improvements in quality, sustainability, and trust. The result might be fewer middlemen overall, but those that remain can become more than just profit-takers—they can become genuine contributors to a better food system.

Bibliography

Several well-known authors and scholars have explored issues related to the complexity, inequities, and inefficiencies of agrifood supply chains, as well as the broader impacts on farmers, consumers, the environment, and public health. Some prominent figures include:

- Michael Pollan: A journalist and author (e.g., The Omnivore’s Dilemma, In Defense of Food) who has extensively written about how industrialized agriculture and convoluted supply chains influence what ends up on our plates and how it affects our health and the environment.

- Marion Nestle (Professor Emerita at New York University): A leading public health and food policy scholar, author of books like Food Politics, who has highlighted how corporate interests shape the food supply chain, often at the expense of nutrition and sustainability.

- Raj Patel : Academic, writer, and activist (author of Stuffed and Starved), Patel examines how globalized supply chains leave farmers and consumers at opposite ends of a dysfunctional system, with intermediaries benefiting at their expense.

- @Vandana Shiva: An environmental activist and scholar who has written extensively on the importance of smallholders, seed sovereignty, and the detrimental effects of industrialized and chemically dependent supply chains on biodiversity, soil health, and farming communities.

- @Tim Lang (City, University of London): A prominent professor of food policy who has analyzed the global supply chain and argued for “sustainable diets” and supply chain restructuring to improve health, equity, and ecological outcomes.

- Jennifer Clapp (University of Waterloo): A scholar focusing on the political economy of global food and agriculture, who has delved into how financialization and corporate consolidation shape supply chains and food security.

- Philip McMichael (Cornell University): A sociologist known for his work on food regime theory, examining how historical shifts in global agrifood systems impact producers, consumers, and global markets, and how these regimes encourage certain supply chain structures.

- Harriet Friedmann (University of Toronto): A political sociologist who has contributed to food regime analysis, exploring how different historical periods of global food trade create and maintain complex and inequitable supply chains.

Below are some notable authors and scholars from French-, German-, Russian-, and Hungarian-speaking contexts who have addressed issues in the agrifood supply chain, agriculture economics, food security, sustainability, and related policy areas.

French Authors and Professors:

- @Marcel Mazoyer: An agronomist and agricultural economist, co-author (with Laurence Roudart) of A History of World Agriculture, exploring how agriculture and food systems developed, and how current global market structures affect farmers and consumers.

- Michel Griffon : A French agronomist who has written on sustainable agriculture, food policies, and how to balance productivity, equity, and environmental protection.

- @Sylvie Brunel: A geographer and economist specializing in development and agriculture, with works focusing on global hunger, food security, and the impacts of globalization on the food supply chain.

German Authors and Professors:

- Joachim von Braun : A German agricultural economist who has extensively studied global food systems, focusing on food security, poverty, and how policy and market changes affect producers and consumers.

- Matin Qaim m: A Professor of Agricultural Economics at the University of Göttingen, known for his research on the sustainability of food systems, the impacts of new technologies, and how supply chain structures influence farmers’ welfare and consumer health.

Russian Authors and Professors:

- @Natalia Shagaida: An expert in agricultural policy and rural development, associated with institutions like the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), she has examined how market structures and policies affect Russian agriculture and food distribution.

- @Vladimir Trukhachev: As a leader in Russian agricultural education (Rector of the Russian State Agrarian University), he has contributed to discussions on improving agricultural practices, sustainable rural development, and strengthening local food systems.

Hungarian Authors and Professors:

- Zoltan Lakner : A Professor at Corvinus University of Budapest, specializing in food economics, supply chain management, and innovation in the food industry. His work often addresses how changes in supply chain structures influence competitiveness, food quality, and sustainability.

- Attila Jambor : Also affiliated with Corvinus University, he focuses on agricultural economics, EU agricultural policy, and the ways in which supply chain reforms can improve farmer incomes, consumer satisfaction, and overall sector resilience.

These authors and professors approach the challenges of the agrifood system from different angles—policy, economics, history, sustainability, and social justice—helping to create a nuanced understanding of how and why current supply chain structures exist, and what changes might lead to fairer, more transparent, and more sustainable food systems.

Feel free to share this newsletter with your friends and colleagues. If you want more updates and insights, subscribe to our newsletter #YourExportMentor.