LEARNOBYTES (Week: 29 April 2024)

The future of eLearning is DIALOGUE-BASED! Yes, you heard it right!

Hi Folks,

At Learnnovators, we're convinced that the future of eLearning is dialogue-based. Just as the transition from traditional search engines like Google to conversational platforms like ChatGPT represents a shift towards interactive, supportive digital interactions, we believe that our eLearning courses will mirror this evolution. By transforming our course design from a monologue that informs, to a dialogue that engages, we can bridge the gap between passive learning and active engagement.

Here's why this idea of dialog-based eLearning resonates with us:

🎯 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: Mimics natural communication, keeping learners actively engaged rather than passively absorbing information.

🚀 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹-𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: Provides learners with immediate feedback and support, closely resembling interactive human conversation.

🔄 𝗥𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Reflects current trends in digital communication where interaction is preferred over one-sided information flow.

🌍 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗦𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘀: Encourages critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as learners are prompted to engage in conversations rather than just listening.

♟️ 𝗦𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁: Fosters not just knowledge acquisition, but also critical engagement and deeper understanding.

For us, the shifts in our eLearning strategies to more dialogue-focused interactions look very promising and also inevitable.

But, what do our folks in the community think about this idea? According to them, how likely is it that eLearning will transform from a monologue-based to a dialogue-based approach in the coming years?

If you are keen to gauge the community's stance on this topic, and optionally, share your perspective with other members, please explore our latest LearnoPoll available HERE.

Now, let's dive into the curated list of learning bytes from experts that inspired us last week:

LEARNOBYTE #1:

"𝘈𝘐 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭, 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦-𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘺 𝘸𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳—𝘢 𝘵𝘺𝘱𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯-𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦. 𝘍𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺, 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘐 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘦𝘹𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦... 𝘉𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘈𝘐 𝘤𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘲𝘶𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘭... 𝘐𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘫𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘵𝘰𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯."

- Anne-Laure Le Cunff

Source: Ness Labs

LEARNOBYTE #2:

"𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘹 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘴... (𝘓𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘴𝘦) 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘯'𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘹 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴... 𝘙𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘴. 𝘏𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳, 𝘳𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘰𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘧 𝘢 𝘳𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘪𝘰𝘳/𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘰𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘵𝘢𝘴𝘬 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘯 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺. 𝘛𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘯𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘹 𝘢 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮."

- Jess Almlie, M.S.

Source: L&D Must Change

LEARNOBYTE #3:

"...𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘭𝘦𝘧𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴—𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘦. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦’𝘴 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘣𝘦 𝘪𝘵 𝘶𝘱𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘦𝘵𝘤. 𝘐𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘯’𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘭, 𝘸𝘦’𝘭𝘭 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘪𝘵... 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘥𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘪𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘥. 𝘐𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘣𝘰𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘥 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘦. 𝘐𝘵 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭."

- Bob Mosher, Conrad Gottfredson

Source: APPLY Synergies

LEARNOBYTE #4:

"𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘈𝘐 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬, 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘤𝘵. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘢𝘯𝘥 (𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘧𝘦𝘭𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺, 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘭𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦)... (𝘐𝘵) 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘷𝘢𝘭𝘶𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘰𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵."

- Julian Stodd

Source: LinkedIn Pulse

LEARNOBYTE #5:

“…𝘈𝘐 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘤𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘶𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘢𝘯𝘺, 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘥𝘰… 𝘞𝘦𝘭𝘭, 𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘓&𝘋 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘪𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩 𝘰𝘧 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸𝘭𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵. 𝘕𝘰𝘸, 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸, 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘢 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘺 𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘩. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘭𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘓&𝘋 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘴. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘯, 𝘐 𝘨𝘶𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘦 𝘪𝘵... 𝘕𝘰𝘸, 𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘴, 𝘐 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘸𝘦'𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘮𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦.”

- Josh Bersin

Source: Josh Bersin's Blog

LEARNOBYTE #6:

"𝘉𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯 𝘓&𝘋 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭, 𝘐 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘦𝘺𝘦-𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦. 𝘐 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯'𝘵 𝘥𝘰 𝘦𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘰 𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘴. 𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘦𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘶𝘤𝘩 𝘩𝘪𝘨𝘩 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮! 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩?"

- Namita Ratra

Source: LinkedIn Pulse

LEARNOBYTE #7:

"𝘐 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘈𝘐-𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯-𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭..., 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘐 𝘵𝘰 100% 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘥 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥. 𝘍𝘪𝘳𝘴𝘵, 𝘠𝘌𝘚 𝘞𝘌 𝘚𝘏𝘖𝘜𝘓𝘋. 𝘐 𝘴𝘶𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘳𝘴, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘤 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘺 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵."

- Julie Dirksen

Source: Usable Learning

LEARNOBYTE #8:

"𝘊𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵, 𝘰𝘧 𝘣𝘰𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘺𝘱𝘦𝘴 (𝘋𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯-𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘋𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘯-𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘵). 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱. 𝘞𝘦 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘣𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘰𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘴. 𝘞𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘣𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘣𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘴𝘰 𝘸𝘦 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨."

- Clark Quinn

Source: LEARNLETS

LEARNOBYTE #9:

"𝘔𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘐. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘰𝘯𝘴... (𝘏𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳) 𝘈𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘱𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘶𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦, 𝘪𝘯 𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘢𝘥. 𝘈𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘯𝘶𝘮𝘣𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘧 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘣𝘰𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘈𝘐, 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘶𝘯𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 - 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘴. 𝘎𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥, 𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘈𝘐𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘴𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰 𝘪𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘢𝘧𝘦, 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘸𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘣𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘴."

- Ethan Mollick

Source: One Useful Thing

LEARNOBYTE #10:

"𝘞𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘢 𝘣𝘰𝘰𝘬, 𝘢 𝘮𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘦, 𝘢 3𝘋 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥 𝘦𝘵𝘤 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘵 (𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘵 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥, 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰!) 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘶𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘪𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘥𝘰𝘸 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘵 300 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘱𝘺𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘭𝘢𝘸 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺 “𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨” 𝘢 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘢𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘢 𝘳𝘪𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘶𝘭𝘰𝘶𝘴. 𝘌𝘚𝘗𝘌𝘊𝘐𝘈𝘓𝘓𝘠 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘜𝘉𝘐, 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨... 𝘐 𝘢𝘮 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘣𝘪𝘨 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘔𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘭𝘦."

- Martin Dougiamas

Source: eLearning Africa News

Hope you find these bytes interesting too.

• Which is the learning byte (from the above list) that resonated with you the most, folks?
• What are some of the other learning bytes that inspired you last week?

Please share in the comments section below.