And now we wait . . .
Good morning and welcome to US Election Countdown! I'm Steff Chávez, the FT's Washington reporter. Here’s what’s on deck today:
Donald Trump’s fate is now in the hands of the jury.
These 12 New Yorkers — seven men and five women — began deliberations yesterday morning in Trump’s “hush money” trial, and could hand down a verdict at any moment now [free to read].
After deliberating for more than four hours yesterday, the panel sent two notes to the judge, one asking for some testimony to be read back to them, and the other to hear the jury instructions again. Deliberations resume at 9.30am Eastern time today.
New York law requires that jurors reach a unanimous decision on each of the 34 criminal charges against Trump. If they ultimately deadlock, the judge would have to declare a mistrial, and the Manhattan district attorney’s office would decide whether to try the case again.
If we get a guilty verdict, it’s unlikely that Trump would be locked up. He would likely appeal the verdict, in what would be a months-long process. He would also be a first-time offender, and there would be a ton of unprecedented logistical challenges around putting a former president, who must have Secret Service protection, in jail. It is not, however, out of the question.
Justice Juan Merchan told the jury on Wednesday to “consult with each other” and “not surrender an honest view of the evidence simply because [they] want the trial to end”.
Recommended by LinkedIn
As Merchan outlined the charges against Trump, the former president sometimes shook his head but at other points seemed to snooze. Afterwards, he told reporters that “Mother Teresa could not beat these charges” and “the whole thing is rigged”. As the jury deliberated, Trump railed against the case on his Truth Social platform, saying the trial is “a third world election interference hoax”.
Jury deliberations come after nine long hours of closing arguments on Tuesday, when prosecutors and defence attorneys outlined competing narratives of testimony from star witness Michael Cohen.
Campaign clips: the latest election headlines
Behind the scenes
Now that Nikki Haley has said she will vote for Trump, a big question is whether her deep-pocketed donors will follow suit. . . . Register for the FT to keep reading the newsletter for free.
Perpetual Inventory Clerk at Macy's
6moBe strong 💪
PROPERTY PONTIFEX presso archiram.com zero impact house protocol - / n
6moidiot post
--
6mo👍
A la recherche d'un poste
6moHistory teaches that, when times are hard and a nation has to choose between negligence and tyranny, the voters elect tyranny. With Trump there will be no difference of pattern, in my opinion. People are tired of sluggish leadership, funds rigging, wars spreading, climate change fanatics, criminality skyrocketing, no accountability, and many other factors denoting lousy government practices. The jury might decide to condemn DT to help JB, but that would set the US on a dangerous path of political gerrymandering in favour of the Dems, and it might eventually work. But the voters could feel betrayed and decide to vote Republican thereafter, and by doing so, the demise of the Democrat party would be around the corner.
--former now retired from this role of NHS Operational Lead Long Term Conditions
6moThe masses love him ? I think he represents strength of character and that’s what they want leadership !!! Not getting it with President Biden !