Photopolymer Mysteries: Who Needs Base Thickness Anyway?
Almost everyone knows the height of a photopolymer. Each industry has its recommended standard, but few know the base thickness—and even fewer understand its importance. Measuring it? Of course not! Why bother?
If nobody mentions it, everyone’s happy.
Now, if you struggle with dot gain or uneven solid areas when switching between photopolymers—especially around barcodes or fine edges—this might be the culprit. Tweaking the pressure? That only shifts the problem to the image, and increasing it will just bring new defects you hadn’t noticed before.
But wait, there’s more! The dimensional stability of the dot, the plate’s lifespan, and the PET adhesion are also at stake.
What’s the right height?
There isn’t one perfect answer. What truly matters is minimizing variation both within and between plates. But if you insist, I usually recommend keeping the base thickness at around 70% of the total plate height.
What’s an acceptable variation?
Let’s say the base is 70% of the total height: for a 1.14 mm plate, the base would be 0.80 mm. A variation of ±0.02 mm is reasonable.
Did this help? Maybe even a like wouldn’t be too much to ask… Or is that pushing it?
Enjoy your day!
Prepress Supervisor at MM Packaging PR
1moUn debate bien interesante. He tenido ambos escenarios y es interesante ver como al entrar en los niveles de relieve y base hemos podido aminorar problemas de impresión usando las ventajas y desventajas de cada escenario. Gracias por compartir sus puntos de vista los cuales tendremos en mente en futuras situaciones en la prensa. Saludos
Flexo Technical & Service Manager
2moAgree to disagree! In your example 1.14 with a base on 0.8, relief will be .34 not really applicable on real life, too high. 70%-30% rule kind of apply for thicker plates, the thinner the plate the most precise the relief need to be in order achieve the right support. And regarding the base thickness, yes it is measured on factory and the tolerance is minimum to avoid issues on print, need to measure on the field, not really.