Professionally non educated EDITORS

Professionally non educated EDITORS and private owners of newspapers perpetrate really serious immoral act in science by that it hinders its natural development and creating an deceitful picture of some authors by their glorification:

12 In 1919 it had carried an article [13 autor Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), 15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)] announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.”

16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung [17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)] carried a large close-up portrait of Einstein whose caption read: “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.”

2 The huge public acclaim that was accorded Einstein. It also vexed conservative academics (e.g. the Nobel Laureate Philipp Lenard have felt that the theoretical physicist Einstein had captured too much of the limelight, while other, experimental physicists were not appreciated enough.)

......

Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting

Jeroen van Dongen

Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands

.....

***THE NOBEL PRIZES IN CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS WORK FOR CONFIRMATION EINSTEIN´S General Theory of Relativity ***

they just in order to again and again propagandize the physics of space-time.

Outrageous claims (9):

1.gravitational waves, tiny distortions of spacetime that were first predicted by Einstein in 1916.

2.Gravitational waves are perturbations in the theoretical curvature of spacetime caused by accelerated masses.

3.The existence of gravitational radiation is a specific prediction of general relativity, but is a feature of all theories of gravity that obey special relativity.

What are gravitational waves?

4.Gravitational waves are ripples that carry energy across the universe. They were predicted to exist by Albert Einstein in 1916 as a consequence of his General Theory of Relativity. Although there is strong circumstantial evidence for their existence, gravitational waves have not been directly detected before. This is because they are minuscule – a million times smaller than an atom.

5.They are like tiny waves on a lake – from far away, the lake's surface looks glassy smooth; only up very close can the details of the surface be seen.

6.Particularly exciting are "primordial" gravitational waves, which were generated in the first moments of the universe's birth. These carry vital information about how the universe began.

 "primordial" = raw, original, early, primordial, ultimate, source, basic, fundamental, essential, primary, elementary, primordi

What is general relativity?

7.In 1916, Albert Einstein discovered a mathematical way to explain gravity. He called it his general theory of relativity.

8.In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation, is a theory of exponential expansion of space in the early universe. The inflationary epoch lasted from 10e−36 seconds after the conjectured Big Bang singularity to sometime between 10e−33 and 10e−32 seconds after the singularity. Following the inflationary period, the Universe continues to expand, but at a less rapid rate.[1]

9.Inflation theory was first developed by Alan Guth at Cornell in 1979. It developed further in the early 1980s. It explains the origin of the large-scale structure of the cosmos.

 

Physics has EXPERIMENTS that confirm physical principles.

Mathematics DOES NOT KNOW the EXPERIMENTS!

 

Motto:

"The difference between a good experiment and a good theory is in the fact that the theory gets old quickly and it is replaced by another one, based on more perfect ideas. It will be forgotten quickly. The experiment is something else. The experiment, which has been thought well and performed carefully, will step in the science forever. It will become its part. It is possible to explain such experiment differently in different periods of times."

P. L. KAPICA

Mathematics with space-time kills physics.

 

Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a mathematical theory. Why is it wrong from the point of view of physics ?

Einstein's Procedure for Synchronizing Clocks

John D. Norton

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh PA 15260. Homepage: www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton

This page (with animated figures) is available at www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies

John D. Norton's Homepage--redirect

 

Albert Einstein und Philipp Lenard

Dr. Charlotte Schönbeck

Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg

Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwisse

 THEORY AND ITS COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT

Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field - A New Theory

Kaufmann's Experiment

The electromagnetic field. Maswell's equations.

The non-linear form of the interference field

Fizeau's Experiment

Harres's Experiment

Extraordinary proofs:

Einstein's Theory of Relativity Can not Explain …

Critical examination of fundamentals in physics

New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996,

ISBN 80-85665-64-6.

Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. – Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla ,

E 9. -13 September 1996,

Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, ISBN 80-88880-38-6

As Richard Feynman warned scientists «The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.»

Emphasizing "verify[ing]" or "confirm[ing]" makes it far too easy for one to fool themselves!

An emphasis upon "falsifications", "contradictions", "contrary" results, etc., can help us all counteract our very human tendency toward "confirmation bias" (fooling oneself)."

And what about Albert Einstein.

Did he not deceive himself?

Did not he deceive us all?

HISTORY REPEATED ...

In the era when the "marriage of mathematic with physics" is the space – time, many do not know what space is.

Einstein says that gravity "is born" when the substance gets into the network space – time.

And Lorenz's transformation "shows“ that a son can be a grandfather of his father and that various clocks show different times depending on the speed of movement.

We have returned to the time of the old Jews when they were making a deity-golden calf, poured out of jewelry, and begged him to deliver them from evil. These are now "Einstein´s vicious circle" and "space - time" as modern "deities", to which most of today's theoretical physicists pray...

Mathematics in real 3D space is a basic tool of science.

The problem arises when real physical experiments from 3D space are solved in a utopian 4D space that has been transformed (smuggled) into physics by mathematicians from past centuries: Poincare, Lorentz,...

Einstein and mathematicians brought chaos into physics. They has many non-physical bad concepts:

The definition of "local time" using the "Lorentz transformation formulas" (space-time).

The definition of "covariant equation" using "local time", and

"Lorentz transformation equations" (space-time).

The definition of "physical definition of simultaneity" using "covariant equations," "local time" and "Lorentz transformation equations" (space-time).

The definition of "invariant interval" using "physical definition of simultaneity", "covariant equations," "local time" and "Lorentz transformation formulas" (space-time).

………………………………………….

Please take into account that the theory may be based on mathematical or physical principles.

As for mathematical theory based on mathematical principles, everything is fine.

Similarly, when it comes to physical theory based on physical principles, everything is all right.

Problems arise when it comes to physical theory based on mathematical principles - as is the case of Einstein's theory of relativity, Lorentz transformations,...

In mathematics, the Poincaré conjecture is a theorem about the characterization of the 3-sphere, which is the hypersphere that bounds the unit ball in four-dimensional space.

In 1994, Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman proved the soul conjecture. In 2003, he proved (confirmed in 2006) Thurston's geometrization conjecture. This consequently solved in the affirmative the Poincaré conjecture.

Nobel laureates in physics are mostly physicists, who mainly create and defend physics. Einstein never received a Nobel prize for relativity...

For nearly 100 years ago have been Nobel Prize winners said:

"- The theory of relativity is a mathematical and not a physical theory.

- The theory is far from being confirmed experimentally, the results of the solar eclipse expeditions allow other interpretations.

- The principle of relativity is only valid for mass-dependent movements

- The theory of relativity contradicts the fundamental ideas about space and time: the Euclidean space and the usual ideas of time must remain binding. "

 

I strongly demand:

The events of 1905-1920, we can not replace by the events of 1938-1945.

We would be making a big mistake with this.

Because other future generations will hate us for it.

Crimes of earlier periods lead to war. They are the cause of the wars.

The war is very bad.

 Change QUALITY

1905 A.E. : Einstein ´s theory Tkin =mc^2 – mo c^2

1996: Tkin id =mc^2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ]

Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ]

Einstein's theory works only for v < 0.1c.

…………………………………..

Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a mathematical theory. Why is it wrong from the point of view of physics ?

Einstein's Procedure for Synchronizing Clocks

John D. Norton

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh PA 15260. Homepage: www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton

This page (with animated figures) is available at www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies

John D. Norton's Homepage--redirect

Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting

Jeroen van Dongen

Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands

Two important and unpleasant events occurred in Albert Einstein’s life in 1920: That August an antirelativity rally was held in the large auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, and a few weeks later Einstein was drawn into a tense and highly publicized debate with Philipp Lenard on the merits of relativity at a meeting in Bad Nauheim, Germany.

12 In 1919 it had carried an article announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.”

13 Its author, Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), was a close acquaintance of Einstein’s

15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)

16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung : “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.”

17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)

Einstein's Theory of Relativity is a mathematical theory. Why is it wrong from the point of view of physics ?

Einstein's Procedure for Synchronizing Clocks

John D. Norton

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh PA 15260. Homepage: www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton

This page (with animated figures) is available at www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies

John D. Norton's Homepage--redirect

FACTS to 1918:

6 he has stolen the work of others and has mathematized physics to such an extent that fellow physicists have been left clueless. Furthermore, the article continued, Einstein had undertaken a propaganda campaign by which he had cast a spell both over the public and over academic circles-but in reality relativity was nothing but fraud and fantasy. The author of the piece was Paul Weyland (1888-1972, figure 1), an obscure right-wing publicist and talented rabble-rouser- one of the shadier products of postwar Berlin.

8 Weyland also drew heavily on Lenard's more substantive objections to Einstein’s theory of relativity, which Lenard had published in 1918.

10 but Weyland contended that they had remained undisputed. Weyland’s shrill tone in his newspaper article and the highly public character of his accusations were indeed new, however. Also new was their thinly concealed anti-Semitic character: Weyland claimed that Einstein had “a particular press, a particular community

but Weyland contended that they had remained undisputed. Weyland’s shrill tone in his newspaper article and the highly public character of his accusations were indeed new, however. Also new was their thinly concealed anti-Semitic character: Weyland claimed that Einstein had “a particular press, a particular community [Gemeinde]” that kept feeding pro-Einstein stories to the public. enough: The widely circulating, liberal Berliner Tageblatt was published by Rudolph Mosse

FACTS (1919 - 1920) :

Professionally non educated EDITORS ( non physicists ) and private owners of newspapers perpetrate really serious immoral act in science by that it hinders its natural development and creating an deceitful picture of Albert Einstein by his glorification:

12 In 1919 it had carried an article [13 autor Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), 15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)] announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.”

16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung [17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)] carried a large close-up portrait of Einstein whose caption read: “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.”

2 The huge public acclaim that was accorded Einstein. It also vexed conservative academics (e.g. the Nobel Laureate Philipp Lenard have felt that the theoretical physicist Einstein had captured too much of the limelight, while other, experimental physicists were not appreciated enough.)

FACTS Then followed (1920):

Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting

Jeroen van Dongen

Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands

Two important and unpleasant events occurred in Albert Einstein’s life in 1920: That August an antirelativity rally was held in the large auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, and a few weeks later Einstein was drawn into a tense and highly publicized debate with Philipp Lenard on the merits of relativity at a meeting in Bad Nauheim, Germany.

73 Nonetheless, tensions had been mounting. Max Planck was firmly in the chair, but prior to the debate--because he was still not certain whether Einstein would remain in Berlin--he appeared to be quite agitated.

74 Paul Weyland also was present at the debate--but this time he kept a low profile. Einstein and his wife Elsa were strongly affected by the exchange: Elsa suffered a nervous breakdown.

75 The Viennese experimental physicist Felix Ehrenhaft (1879- 1952) recalled that he had to take a highly upset Einstein out for a calming stroll in the park after the debate. Later that evening they avoided the uneasy company of their fellow physicists.

76 Both Lenard and Einstein left the conference deeply distressed. Lenard renounced his membership in the DPG--and even denied admittance to his office at the University of Heidelberg to any of its members.

Albert Einstein und Philipp Lenard

Dr. Charlotte Schönbeck

Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg

Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwisse

Because physicists build upon the work of others, physicists take fraud very seriously.

No one wants to build their own work on a shaky foundation supplied by fraudulent ideas.

The community helps identify and eliminate fraud. Though fraud is rare in science, it sometimes happens. These occasional cases of fraud are identified through the scrutiny of the scientific community.

 

Extraordinary proofs:

Einstein's Theory of Relativity Can not Explain …

Critical examination of fundamentals in physics

New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996,

ISBN 80-85665-64-6.

Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. – Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla ,

E 9. -13 September 1996,

Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, ISBN 80-88880-38-6

Participants in science behave scientifically

Science is sometimes misconstrued as an elite endeavor in which one has to be a member of "the club" in order to be taken seriously. That's a bit misleading. In fact, science is now open to anyone (regardless of age, gender, religious commitment, physical ability, ethnicity, country of origin, political views, nearsightedness, favorite ice cream flavor — whatever!) and benefits tremendously from the expanding diversity of perspectives offered by its participants. However, science only works because the people involved with it behave "scientifically" — that is, behave in ways that push science forward.

http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_09

SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY: TRUE OR FALSE?

If scientific idea is more accurate and should be used as the basis of future research. True scientific controversy involves competing scientific ideas.

<ref>Jeroen van Dongen

Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands</ref>

<ref>Albert Einstein und Philipp Lenard

Dr. Charlotte Schönbeck

Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg

Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwisse</ref>

<ref>New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996,

ISBN 80-85665-64-6.

Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. – Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla ,

E 9. -13 September 1996,

Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, ISBN 80-88880-38-6</ref>

<ref>Einstein's Procedure for Synchronizing Clocks

John D. Norton

Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh PA 15260. Homepage: www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton

This page (with animated figures) is available at www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/goodies

John D. Norton's Homepage--redirect</ref>