Rubio, Homan, and Miller: Trump's Picks Poised to Reshape U.S.-Latin America Relations

As we approach to the shift in U.S. leadership, the implications for Latin America loom large. Three key figures in Trump's proposed administration - Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Tom Homan as Border Czar, and Stephen Miller as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy - signal a worrying turn towards hardline policies that could reshape U.S.-Latin American relations. Their combined approach threatens to revive outdated paradigms, intensify deportations, and implement stringent immigration measures that may have far-reaching consequences for both the region and Latino communities within the United States.

MARCO RUBIO

Secretary of State

As Marco Rubio prepares to take the helm of U.S. foreign policy, Latin America braces for a potentially tumultuous era. Rubio's appointment as Secretary of State in Trump's second term signals a worrying shift towards a narrow, ideologically driven approach to a region that demands nuance and understanding.

Rubio's Cuban-American heritage has long informed his stance on Latin American affairs, but what was once a strength now threatens to become a liability. His laser focus on the "troika of tyranny" – Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua – while understandable, risks reducing the entire region to a simplistic battleground of democracy versus dictatorship.

This mentality puts aside the complex realities of modern Latin America. While Rubio rails against leftist leaders, he overlooks the nuanced political landscapes of countries like Chile, Colombia, and Brazil, where democratic processes have yielded diverse leadership across the political spectrum.

Rubio's criticism of China's growing influence in the region, while not unfounded, often comes across as alarmist and fails to acknowledge the economic realities driving these partnerships. His aggresive stance may push Latin American nations closer to Beijing rather than fostering the cooperation needed to address this challenge.

Perhaps most concerning is how Rubio's Latin American policy dovetails with Trump's "America First" doctrine. While Rubio may be more hawkish than Trump on certain issues, his willingness to possibly align with the elected president's isolationist tendencies bodes ill for meaningful engagement with the region.

The appointment of Michael Waltz as National Security Advisor further cements this approach. Together, Rubio and Waltz are poised to implement a foreign policy that views Latin America through a lens of confrontation rather than collaboration.

This vision fails to grasp the multifaceted challenges facing Latin America today. Climate change, organized crime, economic inequality, and migration require coordinated, regional responses. By fixating on ideological battles, Rubio risks squandering opportunities for meaningful cooperation on these pressing issues.

Moreover, Rubio's hardening stance on immigration – a dramatic departure from his earlier, more nuanced position – threatens to further strain relations with Latin American partners. His recent defense of Trump's inflammatory rhetoric on immigrants signals a troubling shift towards nativism that could have far-reaching consequences for regional stability.

As Latin America grapples with the aftermath of the pandemic, political upheavals, and economic challenges, it needs a United States that engages thoughtfully and comprehensively. Instead, Rubio's appointment promises a return to outdated paradigms that reduce complex nations to caricatures and prioritize ideology over pragmatism.

The international community should brace for a U.S. Latin American policy that, under Rubio's guidance, may prioritize confrontation over cooperation. This approach not only threatens to isolate the U.S. from its hemispheric partners but also risks exacerbating the very problems it purports to solve.

TOM HOMAN

Border Czar

In the ever-shifting landscape of American politics, few figures embody the stark contradictions of the U.S. immigration debate quite like Tom Homan. Once a decorated civil servant under Obama, now poised to become Trump's immigration enforcer-in-chief. The irony is as palpable as it is unsettling.

Homan's trajectory from receiving a “Presidential Rank Award for Distinguished Service” to becoming the face of hardline immigration policies is a testament to the seismic shifts in the national discourse. His chilling declaration that undocumented immigrants "should be afraid" isn't just rhetoric; it's a harbinger of the policies to come.

During his first stint in the Trump administration, Homan orchestrated a 40% surge in deportation arrests. The numbers are staggering: 41,319 people detained in mere months, a 38% increase from the same period the previous year. But it's the human cost that truly staggers the mind - families torn apart at courthouses, pregnant women behind bars, and children wrenched from their parents' arms under the cruel "Zero Tolerance" policy.

Now, as Trump's proposed "border czar," Homan threatens to cast an even longer shadow. His influence could stretch from the Rio Grande to the Great Lakes, from bustling airports to quiet coastal towns. For Latin American nations and Latino communities in the U.S., Homan's appointment looms like a storm on the horizon, threatening with a tempest of deportations.

The price tag for this vision? A mind-boggling $88 billion to deport just a million people in a year (from a report of the American Immigration Council). But the economic implications run deeper. Mass deportations could lead to slower GDP growth, increased prices, and larger deficits. Undocumented workers contribute about $90 billion in taxes annually, a significant sum that would vanish with their expulsion. Moreover, the U.S. has historically never deported more than 400,000 people in a year, making Homan's pledge to run "the biggest deportation operation this country's ever seen" an unprecedented -and hopefully impossible- challenge.

Yet, in the face of these staggering costs and logistical hurdles, Trump remains undeterred. He has stated that there's "no price tag" for his mass deportation plan, emphasizing necessity over cost. "It's not about cost," Trump insists. "It's a necessity. Those who have committed heinous acts and drug lords who have ravaged nations must return to their origins. There is no price too high.” However, voters, still waiting for other campaign promises to be fulfilled, may scrutinize the allocation of scarce resources.

Despite Trump's fiery rhetoric and hardline stance on immigration, his first term saw significantly fewer deportations than Obama's administration. During Obama's first term, 2.9 million people were deported, with a staggering 409,849 in 2012 alone. In contrast, Trump's entire four-year term resulted in just 1.5 million deportations, never exceeding 260,000 in a single year. This disparity raises critical questions about the relationship between political rhetoric and actual policy implementation. Will history repeat itself? Will the cost and logistical challenges of mass deportations temper action, leaving the rhetoric as a mere political tool?

STEPHEN MILLER

White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy

"We must save American lives! We must save Americans from these immigrant criminals!" These chilling words, attributed to Stephen Miller, encapsulate the hardline immigration stance that has defined his career and could shape the future of U.S.-Latin American relations.

During Trump's first term, Miller was the architect of numerous controversial policies that reshaped the U.S. immigration landscape. He spearheaded initiatives to make legal immigration more difficult and was the driving force behind the infamous travel ban that barred citizens from several Muslim-majority countries. The hasty implementation of this ban led to chaos at airports, with refugees, elderly individuals, and even children (under Zero tolerance policy) detained.

As Miller potentially returns as White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy in a second Trump administration, we're forced to confront his previous legacy. This is a man who led National Security Council meetings despite lacking an official role, demonstrating his outsized influence on immigration policy.

Miller's vision was clearly stated last February speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC): "seal the border, no illegals in, everyone here goes out." His proposed policies include reinstating "Remain in Mexico," finishing the border wall, increasing deportations, and even ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. It's a scorched earth approach that threatens to upend lives and shatter communities.

For Mexico and other Latin American countries, the implications are staggering. The potential influx of deportees could overwhelm social services and economies already stretched thin. We've already seen a preview of this under the Biden administration, which reached an agreement with Mexico to take back Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. From May to November 2023 alone, Mexico received 19,561 non-Mexican nationals returned or removed from the United States, with Venezuelans making up the majority at 13,545. This time Miller's policies would likely amplify this pressure to a breaking point.

Within the U.S., Latino communities might face heightened scrutiny, increased difficulty in obtaining or maintaining legal status, and a chilling effect on accessing public services due to fear of immigration consequences. His rhetoric often portrays immigrants as threats to public safety and economic stability, a narrative that could further marginalize Latino communities and strain social cohesion.

As we contemplate Miller's potential role, we must consider the broader implications for regional stability, human rights, and the very fabric of American society. His return to power could have profound implications for Latin America and Latino communities within the United States. His track record suggests a continuation and possible intensification of hardline policies that could further strain U.S.-Latin American relations.

………….

The appointments of Rubio, Homan, and Miller paint a stark picture of a potential Trump administration's approach to Latin America and immigration. This triumvirate, each with their own brand of hardline policies, threatens to plunge U.S.-Latin American relations into a new era.