Showing Tangible Value as an Agile Coach & Scrum Master vs. A.I.
Today I made an article/post on LinkedIn as I had several discussions during my day about the number of layoffs in the agile space. One thing that was discussed was how you add value as a scrum master and coach vs. A.I.
As an agile coach and scrum master, there are a number of ways to show the tangible value of your work and leadership abilities to executives within your organization.
Here are a few examples:
In addition to these specific examples, you can also show tangible value by:
By demonstrating the value of your work in these ways, you can help executives understand the impact that you are having on the organization and the bottom line. This can help me to secure funding for your contracts and team budget allocation as we slide into Q3/Q4 and gain support for your initiatives, and build a strong reputation within the organization.
Here are some additional tips for showing tangible value as an agile coach and scrum master:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Are You Laying Off Your Scrum Masters?
Think Again 🤔
In 2022-2023, there has been a trend of companies laying off their Scrum Masters in favor of self-sustaining teams. We saw large financial organizations laying off some of the most talented Agile professionals that a year ago were in high demand. Whilst the financial benefits may be great in the books in the short term, I feel this shortsighted decision will have negative consequences in the long run.
A Scrum Master can work with 1-3 teams at a time. This is because the Scrum Master's role is to facilitate and coach the team, not to do the work for them. To get around this, employers are looking for hybrid PM/Scrum Master roles. They want PMs who can also facilitate the ceremonies. One mistake that employers make though is assuming this is more of an administrative role vs. a technical, leadership role. Can a developer be a scrum master in a self-sustaining team....yes, but the org will have to accept there will be decreased capacity. The general rule of thumb is that a Scrum Master allocates 20 hour per team. That would mean the developer would have 20 hours to allocate towards development. That is a decision that some companies are making, some without thinking, yet expecting the same velocity as when a scrum master was involved.
When a company lays off its Scrum Masters, it is essentially saying that it does not believe in the seen/unseen value of facilitation and coaching. This could have cultural reverberations. This is a mistake because facilitation and coaching are essential for creating self-sustaining teams. Much like developers who continuously have to update their skills to be relevant, so do scrum masters and agile coaches. In order to keep our certifications up, we need to be practicing and doing a prescribed amount of training and professional development hours to maintain our certification and memberships.
Without allocated hours for availability for a Scrum Master, teams are more likely to make mistakes, not meet deadlines, and deliver poor-quality work. This will ultimately lead to a negative impact on customer experience.
In addition, laying off Scrum Masters will also discourage innovation. Scrum Masters are responsible for creating a psychologically safe space where team members can experiment and take risks. Without a Scrum Master, teams will be less likely to try new things, which will stifle innovation. True, developers are becoming more agile after 20 yrs of it as the norm, however, Scrum Masters help keep things moving along vs. being too close to the code at times and sometimes getting stuck in the weeds. Trust me I know as a former developer. Sometimes we are scientific and strive for perfection.
So, what is the future of the Scrum Master role? I believe that Scrum Masters will become even more important in the future. As businesses become more complex, there will be a greater need for people who can help teams to work effectively and deliver high-quality work.
Will AI replace Scrum Masters? I don't think so. As I have written in prior articles, AI can help Scrum Masters to be more efficient, but it cannot replace the human touch and perceptiveness. AI is only as good as what you feed into it. Scrum Masters are not just facilitators and coaches, they are also servant leaders, mentors, and guides. They help guide teams to understand the business and make the right decisions. So much of what we do revolves around psychology and what drives people. So if you are thinking about laying off Scrum Masters, please reconsider based on skillsets and experience. Maybe we need less administrative Scrum Masters and more Sr. Technical Agile Professionals. We do way more than facilitate meetings and move stuff around on a Kanban board.
Share your thoughts in the comments below...
Chief AI Strategist | Partnering with CEOs to Accelerate Business Transformation through Agile & AI | Driving Innovation, Operational Efficiency, and Revenue Growth
1yYour LinkedIn article effectively sheds light on the crucial role of Agile coaches and Scrum Masters. Your emphasis on demonstrating value through metrics, feedback, and real stories underscores their tangible impact. The trend of layoffs might overlook their multidimensional contributions. Their blend of leadership, mentorship, and technical skills can't be replaced by AI. Your call to recognize their value beyond administration resonates. In today's evolving landscape, their role becomes even more vital. Your article prompts essential reconsideration, advocating for their continued significance. It's a timely reminder of their lasting impact on organizational success.
Agile enthusiast who turns work backlogs and chaos into calm focus and valuable outcomes | Agile Coach | Certified Scrum Professional-ScrumMaster | ICP-ACC | ICP-ATF | ICP-ENT | ICP-CAT
1yGreat suggestions, Theresa McFarlane. I found the "Additional Tips" section to be the most compelling for me. It reminds me of the importance of the important one-two punch of establishing current-state baselines with your teams (via lots of the suggestions you mentioned) but then backing it up by being proactive and telling the leadership about the baselines and, very importantly, keeping them updated about this progress, or lack of progress and what the teams are doing about it. That old notion of trumpeting one's own horn is at play here. Don't assume, just because leadership hires Agilists that they understand and appreciate their value to the organization. It seems easy for leaders to get rid of roles and employees that they don't truly understand.
Thank you for sharing this insighful article!🤗 I also believe that while AI can augment the efficiency of Scrum Masters, it cannot replace the human touch and emotional intelligence required for this role.
Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer
1yThanks for Sharing.