Trudeau's Allegations: Double Standards in Global Politics

Sometimes "Credible Evidence," sometimes "Credible Reasons," and sometimes "Credible Allegations" - Justin Trudeau a Prime Minister of a country or India's Rahul Gandhi?

People who are sensible in Canada would probably know how this person is harming his own country and has become a laughingstock worldwide.

If India's secret agency has indeed been involved in the killing of terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, or if they haven't, let's try to shed some light on both aspects in this article.

If India eliminated the terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar

• After the tragic events of 9/11, the United States conducted military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and occupied these nations. Was this the right thing to do or a mistake?
• Navy Seals were sent into Pakistan to eliminate Osama bin Laden. Was this action by the United States correct or incorrect?
• Canada, a peaceful, liberal, and democratic country, deployed 40,000 soldiers to Afghanistan and Iraq. Was Canada's decision right or wrong?
• Muammar Gaddafi, the leader of Libya, was killed by rebels in 2011. Did the CIA make the right decision in this matter?
• The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and MOSSAD have been involved in various covert operations worldwide, including assassination attempts and targeted killings. We don't need to delve into the specifics, as the world is aware of many such cases. Did the CIA and MOSSAD make the right choices?

If you argue that all these actions were justified, then I, as an Indian, would like to say that if India indeed eliminated Hardeep Singh Nijjar, it was a commendable move. Hats off to India.

Why is it that when a Western country takes such actions, it's deemed acceptable, but when India does, it becomes problematic?

India has been fighting terrorism alone for decades. It doesn't require approval from Western countries to combat this menace.

If India didn't eliminate the terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar

If India hasn't eliminated the terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, but Justin Trudeau still suspects India's involvement, Canada should gather credible evidence and use it in private negotiations with India rather than making baseless allegations in their parliament against an emerging global power. Is this the right approach?

Sometimes, Trudeau talks about "Credible Evidence," "Credible Reasons," and sometimes "Credible Allegations." I'm worried that in the future, he might use terms like "Credible Hopes," "Credible Prayers," or "Credible Requests" without providing proper evidence.

Trudeau's allegations may improve his image in domestic politics by aligning with the Khalistani narrative, but this approach wastes diplomatic efforts. Normalizing relations with India is possible, and the West should avoid romanticizing terrorists.

Despite Interpol issuing a Red Corner notice for him in 2014, Nijjar was granted Canadian citizenship in 2015. Canada's decision to not deport him to the country that filed the complaint and instead granting him citizenship violates international law. How could a country provide refuge to a terrorist noticed by Interpol?

Trudeau is promoting a dangerous separatist agenda from his country and aligning with Khalistani terrorists.

Canadian citizens should urge Justin Trudeau not to provide shelter or sanctuary to Khalistanis and anti-India forces.

Conclusion:

This article aims to provide insights into the complex web of allegations and actions surrounding the Hardeep Singh Nijjar case. It underscores the importance of evidence-based diplomacy and the need for balanced international relations. Stay tuned for our next article, where we will delve deeper into the trade implications of this controversy. Thank you for reading.

For more such article, do visit my blog https://travel-trade.co.in/blog