You Can't Blame It on AI: The Pros and Cons of AI Proofreading
AI is everywhere these days, from smart homes to self-driving cars, and now it's even in our writing tools. If you're a writer or editor (everyone is a writer in some capacity btw), you've probably heard about AI proofreading tools and wondered if they're worth the hype. Well, let's break it down in a fun, casual way and see what’s great and what’s not-so-great about using AI for proofreading. ✍️
The Awesome Stuff
1. Speed and Efficiency
Imagine having a super-fast buddy who can read and correct your work in seconds. That's AI proofreading for you! It zips through your text, spots errors, and suggests fixes faster than you can say "spellcheck." Perfect for those tight deadlines or long documents.
2. Consistency
Ever get tired and start missing mistakes? AI doesn't. It's like having a never-tiring robot editor that applies the same rules every time, ensuring nothing slips through the cracks.
3. Cost-Effective 💸
Professional editors are amazing, but they can be pricey. AI tools, on the other hand, are way cheaper and can save you a ton of money while still getting the job done.
4. Always On
Need to edit something at 3 AM? No problem. AI proofreading tools are up and running 24/7, ready to help whenever you need them. No more waiting for office hours!
The Not-So-Awesome Stuff
1. Lack of Contextual Understanding
AI can be a bit like a clueless friend who doesn’t get your jokes. It might miss the tone or context of your writing, which means it can suggest some pretty awkward corrections.
2. Limited Creativity
Editing is more than just fixing errors; it's about making your writing shine. Human editors can suggest creative tweaks that AI just isn’t programmed to do. It's like comparing a paint-by-numbers kit to a masterpiece.
3. Over-Reliance on Rules
AI loves rules. But sometimes, it follows them too strictly and flags stuff that's actually okay. It's like having a grammar-obsessed friend who won’t let you use slang or contractions.
4. Privacy Concerns
Uploading your text to AI tools can be risky if you’re dealing with sensitive info. Make sure you’re using a trusted service to keep your data safe from prying eyes. AHEM... VisibleThread plug 😉
Objective vs. Subjective Proofreading
Here's a fun way to think about proofreading: it’s got two sides—objective and subjective.
Objective proofreading is all about the hard facts: spelling, grammar, and grade level. It’s like making sure everything’s spelled correctly and using the right punctuation. AI is pretty good here but not perfect. Be careful!
Subjective proofreading is where things get interesting. This covers tone, style, and how your message comes across. Asking AI, "Does this sound professional?" or "How will this message be interpreted?" can get you some cool suggestions, but remember, AI's not great at getting all the nuances right.
AI’s Contextual Limitations
AI might not understand your specific jargon or brand terms. For example, if your company name is VisibleThread (with no space), AI might not catch that and could try to "fix" it. Plus, it might mess up things that are actually correct in your world. So, always double-check those AI edits!
Recommended by LinkedIn
Common Prompts for AI Proofreading (Good & Bad)
To play around and learn about proofreading with AI, try using these prompts to see what works and what doesn't in your context:
1. Grammar and Punctuation Check:
Be mindful that AI won't have the same context you have.
2. Spelling Check: ✅
Be careful with brand words, US vs. UK English, and other specifics to your world.
3. Clarity and Readability:
Generally, these are great prompts. However, beware that AI could remove some important context. Also, note that AI isn't appropriate for a prompt such as "Rewrite this copy to achieve a grade level of 8 or less." Calculations like this aren't Generative AI's forte. Your result would be prone to hallucinations.
4. Consistency:
Generally, these are good prompts. However, in a larger document, they could be dangerous. It's likely better to take everything paragraph by paragraph.
5. Contextual Accuracy:
Careful here! Expecting AI to approach "proper tone" & "cultural references" is a really weak point of Generative AI. We cannot predict how the model will interpret "correct & proper."
6. Stylistic Suggestions:
This is an editor's dream. With tired eyes, it can be difficult to think outside the box or create several alternatives. AI is fantastic at this.
7. Format and Structure:
It depends! It depends on what platform you are using and what the final product looks like. If you have something completely unstructured like a transcript, these types of prompts are fantastic to transform text into something usable.
Wrapping It Up
AI proofreading tools are super handy and can save you time and money. But they’re not perfect—especially when it comes to understanding context or being creative. Use AI as a helpful assistant, but remember, there’s still no substitute for a good human editor. Combining both can give you the best of both worlds!
If you'd like to see this type of stuff in action, I'm doing a LinkedIn Live next week. You’re welcome to join! #AIProofreading #WritingTips #TechInWriting #LinkedInLive
I hope you’re enjoying this content! I'd love to know how you are using AI for proofreading and editing. Comment below!
Teaching Ai @ CompleteAiTraining.com | Building AI Solutions @ Nexibeo.com
4moGreat insights! The balance between AI and human editing is essential. While AI can enhance speed and consistency, human touch still adds valuable creativity and contextual understanding. How do you integrate both in your workflow? #AIProofreading #WritingTips
Marketing Executive at VisibleThread | MSc Digital Marketing Strategy | Award Winning Business Administration Graduate | Best Student 2019 | 1:1 BBus Degree | B2B Marketing | SaaS | Lead Generation | GovCon | Biz Writing
5moEnjoyed reading that, Micheál. 👏 I'm curious, have you any examples of tasks where AI proofreading excels compared to human editors, and vice versa?
Communications, Government Relations , Capture/Proposal Management
5moVery helpful! Who do you suppose is best qualified to both prompt and review Gen AI 🤖 output? I’m betting it’s the very proposal professionals that may feel threatened by Gen AI 🤖, not because they’re concerned that robots 🤖can replace them, but because someone in the C-suite might think 🤔 Gen AI can replace them in certain bean counters’ drive to reduce overhead at all costs. However, the tens of thousands they may save at the expense of your career, bank account, and health insurance interrupted may well cost 💲 far more. Companies lose tens of $ millions because that trimmed propsal workforce loses a few more contracts they could’ve won and fails to pursue others for lack of capacity. This is the trend we see that makes us anxious 😥.