[1]
|
Biotechnological Innovations in the Mineral-Metal Industry
Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation,
2024
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-43625-3_10
|
|
|
[2]
|
A call for modernisation of science, the case of anaerobic digestion: A scoping review
Energy Conversion and Management,
2024
DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118816
|
|
|
[3]
|
Propidium monoazide - polymerase chain reaction reveals viable microbial community shifts in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating domestic sewage at low temperature
Bioresource Technology,
2023
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129564
|
|
|
[4]
|
Methane Production from Confectionery Wastewater Treated in the Anaerobic Labyrinth-Flow Bioreactor
Energies,
2023
DOI:10.3390/en16010571
|
|
|
[5]
|
Integration of Ultra- and Nanofiltration for Potato Processing Water (PPW) Treatment in a Circular Water Recovery System
Membranes,
2023
DOI:10.3390/membranes13010059
|
|
|
[6]
|
Methane Production from Confectionery Wastewater Treated in the Anaerobic Labyrinth-Flow Bioreactor
Energies,
2023
DOI:10.3390/en16010571
|
|
|
[7]
|
Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering
2023
DOI:10.1016/B978-0-443-19180-0.00007-9
|
|
|
[8]
|
Propidium monoazide - polymerase chain reaction reveals viable microbial community shifts in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating domestic sewage at low temperature
Bioresource Technology,
2023
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129564
|
|
|
[9]
|
Agri-food Waste Valorisation
2023
DOI:10.1039/BK9781837670093-00264
|
|
|
[10]
|
Integration of Ultra- and Nanofiltration for Potato Processing Water (PPW) Treatment in a Circular Water Recovery System
Membranes,
2023
DOI:10.3390/membranes13010059
|
|
|
[11]
|
Two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor for co-treatment of food waste and kitchen wastewater for biogas production and nutrients recovery
Chemosphere,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136537
|
|
|
[12]
|
Microbial characteristics in anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating domestic sewage: Effects of HRT and process performance
Journal of Environmental Sciences,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2021.04.022
|
|
|
[13]
|
Techno-economics and Life Cycle Assessment of Bioreactors
2022
DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-89848-5.00008-1
|
|
|
[14]
|
A novel anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor system: Improving process performance and fouling control
Environmental Technology & Innovation,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102821
|
|
|
[15]
|
Low-Carbon Technologies to Remove Organic Micropollutants from Wastewater: A Focus on Pharmaceuticals
Sustainability,
2022
DOI:10.3390/su141811686
|
|
|
[16]
|
Two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor for co-treatment of food waste and kitchen wastewater for biogas production and nutrients recovery
Chemosphere,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136537
|
|
|
[17]
|
2022
DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4077811
|
|
|
[18]
|
A novel anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor system: Improving process performance and fouling control
Environmental Technology & Innovation,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102821
|
|
|
[19]
|
A novel anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor system: Improving process performance and fouling control
Environmental Technology & Innovation,
2022
DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102821
|
|
|
[20]
|
Low-Carbon Technologies to Remove Organic Micropollutants from Wastewater: A Focus on Pharmaceuticals
Sustainability,
2022
DOI:10.3390/su141811686
|
|
|
[21]
|
Long-Term Comparison of Pilot Uasb and Anmbr Reactors Treating Domestic Sewage at Ambient Temperatures
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
2021
DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3994408
|
|
|
[22]
|
Electrocatalytic Properties of a Novel β-PbO2/Halloysite Nanotube Composite Electrode
ACS Omega,
2021
DOI:10.1021/acsomega.0c05651
|
|
|
[23]
|
Strategies and Tools for Pollutant Mitigation
2021
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-63575-6_10
|
|
|
[24]
|
Electrocatalytic Properties of a Novel β-PbO2/Halloysite Nanotube Composite Electrode
ACS Omega,
2021
DOI:10.1021/acsomega.0c05651
|
|
|
[25]
|
Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Trace Organic Contaminants with Wastewater Treatment: A Review
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
2021
DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/691/1/012002
|
|
|
[26]
|
Economic, energy and carbon footprint assessment of integrated forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FOMBR) process in urban wastewater treatment
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology,
2020
DOI:10.1039/C9EW00608G
|
|
|
[27]
|
New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Microbial Biofilms
2020
DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-64279-0.00015-3
|
|
|
[28]
|
Combination of CSTR and membrane process in treating palm oil mill effluent (POME)
PROCEEDINGS OF 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL PROCESS AND PRODUCT ENGINEERING (ICCPPE) 2019,
2020
DOI:10.1063/1.5140956
|
|
|
[29]
|
A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) for the treatment of highly contaminated landfill leachate and biogas production: Effectiveness, limitations and future perspectives
Journal of Cleaner Production,
2020
DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120215
|
|
|
[30]
|
Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes
2020
DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-816823-3.00009-5
|
|
|
[31]
|
The Effect of Scale on the Performance of an Integrated Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Process
Sustainability,
2020
DOI:10.3390/su12114679
|
|
|
[32]
|
Hydrolysis and Methanogenesis in UASB-AnMBR Treating Municipal Wastewater Under Psychrophilic Conditions: Importance of Reactor Configuration and Inoculum
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,
2020
DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2020.567695
|
|
|
[33]
|
Latest Developments in Membrane (Bio)Reactors
Processes,
2020
DOI:10.3390/pr8101239
|
|
|
[34]
|
The Effect of Scale on the Performance of an Integrated Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment Process
Sustainability,
2020
DOI:10.3390/su12114679
|
|
|
[35]
|
Latest Developments in Membrane (Bio)Reactors
Processes,
2020
DOI:10.3390/pr8101239
|
|
|
[36]
|
An overview of the recent trends on the waste valorization techniques for food wastes
Journal of Environmental Management,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.041
|
|
|
[37]
|
Cross comparative analysis of liquid phase anaerobic digestion
Journal of Water Process Engineering,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.005
|
|
|
[38]
|
Impact of sludge recirculation ratios on the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
Bioresource Technology,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121473
|
|
|
[39]
|
Aquaponics Food Production Systems
2019
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-15943-6_10
|
|
|
[40]
|
Anaerobic membrane bioreactor towards biowaste biorefinery and chemical energy harvest: Recent progress, membrane fouling and future perspectives
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
2019
DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109392
|
|
|
[41]
|
Study on Pollutant Removal Efficiency of Industrial Wastewater Using Submerged Anaerobic Membrane Bio-Reactor
Materials Today: Proceedings,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.329
|
|
|
[42]
|
Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery
Bioresource Technology,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.060
|
|
|
[43]
|
Applicability of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
2018
DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012033
|
|
|
[44]
|
Transcriptomics investigation of thyroid hormone disruption in the olfactory system of the Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana tadpole
Aquatic Toxicology,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.06.015
|
|
|
[45]
|
AnMBR as alternative to conventional CSTR to achieve efficient methane production from thermal hydrolyzed sludge at short HRTs
Energy,
2018
DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.201
|
|
|
[46]
|
Strategies for sustainable wastewater treatment based on energy recovery and emerging compounds control: a mini-review
Desalination and Water Treatment,
2018
DOI:10.5004/dwt.2018.22457
|
|
|
[47]
|
A critical review of bioelectrochemical membrane reactor (BECMR) as cutting-edge sustainable wastewater treatment
Reviews in Chemical Engineering,
2017
DOI:10.1515/revce-2016-0012
|
|
|
[48]
|
A critical review of bioelectrochemical membrane reactor (BECMR) as cutting-edge sustainable wastewater treatment
Reviews in Chemical Engineering,
2017
DOI:10.1515/revce-2016-0012
|
|
|
[49]
|
Development of a high-rate submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor
Environmental Technology,
2017
DOI:10.1080/09593330.2017.1309076
|
|
|
[50]
|
A Mini Review of the Techno-environmental Sustainability of Biological Processes for the Treatment of High Organic Content Industrial Wastewater Streams
Waste and Biomass Valorization,
2017
DOI:10.1007/s12649-017-0022-y
|
|
|
[51]
|
A critical review of bioelectrochemical membrane reactor (BECMR) as cutting-edge sustainable wastewater treatment
Reviews in Chemical Engineering,
2017
DOI:10.1515/revce-2016-0012
|
|
|
[52]
|
Utilizing ion-exchange resin to improve recovery from organic shock-loading in an AnMBR treating sewage sludge
Water Research,
2017
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.038
|
|
|
[53]
|
Effects of sludge concentration and biogas sparging rate on critical flux in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor
Journal of Water Process Engineering,
2017
DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.09.012
|
|
|
[54]
|
Advances in biological systems for the treatment of high-strength wastewater
Journal of Water Process Engineering,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.02.008
|
|
|
[55]
|
Comparing the value of bioproducts from different stages of anaerobic membrane bioreactors
Bioresource Technology,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.013
|
|
|
[56]
|
Performance of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for thermomechanical pulping wastewater treatment
Journal of Water Process Engineering,
2016
DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.05.004
|
|
|
[57]
|
Characterization of the proton binding sites of extracellular polymeric substances in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor
Water Research,
2015
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.007
|
|
|
[58]
|
Development of a predictive framework to assess the removal of trace organic chemicals by anaerobic membrane bioreactor
Bioresource Technology,
2015
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.034
|
|
|
[59]
|
Environmental Waste Management
2015
DOI:10.1201/b19243-8
|
|
|