How do you compare and benchmark the performance of companies in different emerging markets or regions?

🎯It's trending. It's high time companies share data only. Then we deploy those who read and put actions. In the realm of more information per second, data is the big thing. In terms of visualization, I think realtime animations will do it. Then we identify at the door with real clients with closed security. We propose this in our light. We can also here from other experts in the industry valuing company goals and metrics. The profound question is who read this data and how do they fly in realtime? #DeepLearning #Visualization #ClosedSecurity #CEOMindset #TransformTheExperience

Common Metrics: Use universal yardsticks like profits, sales, or growth rates. Normalize Data: Adjust numbers for differences like currencies or economies. Industry Standards: Compare to similar companies in each region. Consider Context: Account for local factors like regulations or market conditions. Relative Performance: Assess how each company does compared to its local market's average or index.

Defining scope and criteria: Scope refers to the range of markets, sectors, and company sizes considered, targeting regions or industries poised for growth or representing significant opportunities. Criteria encompass financial health indicators, such as revenue growth, profit margins, and return on equity, alongside market-specific factors like political stability, regulatory environment, and currency risk. Additionally, incorporating ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) factors becomes increasingly relevant, considering sustainability and corporate responsibility impacts on long-term value.

When evaluating the performance of companies across various emerging markets or regions, one often employs a diverse set of metrics and analytical frameworks to gain comprehensive insights. Assessing factors such as revenue growth, market share expansion, operational efficiency, and profitability margins allows for a nuanced comparison. Additionally, considering regional nuances, regulatory environments, and socio-economic dynamics becomes crucial in ensuring a holistic benchmarking exercise. Leveraging comparative analysis alongside industry benchmarks and macroeconomic indicators further enriches the evaluation process, enabling informed decision-making and strategic planning.

Selection of peers is the most important step and should be performed so. Selection of comparable firms should start with the broad sector that the firm under valuation belongs to. Then the valuer should narrow down to the particular sector. For instance, the firm under valuation is from automobile industry. Then the valuer would do well in digging into the sector that this firm belongs to, such as automobile accessories, two wheeler, cars, etc. Such an approach not only limits the selection of peers but also helps in focusing on actually pertinent firms.

To compare and benchmark the performance of companies in different emerging markets or regions, begin by gathering relevant financial data, such as revenue growth, profitability, and cash flow metrics, from credible sources. Ensure consistency by standardizing this data across regions. Next, analyze the data in the context of local economic factors, such as GDP growth, inflation, and currency stability, which can influence performance differently. Additionally, consider qualitative factors like regulatory environment and market conditions. This thorough analysis enables you to benchmark companies against their peers and industry standards, providing a clear picture of relative performance.

Coletar e analisar dados vai além dos números; é necessário capturar o contexto que dá significado a esses dados. Em mercados emergentes, a análise precisa considerar não só indicadores financeiros e macroeconômicos, mas também fatores qualitativos, como condições regulatórias, comportamento do consumidor e tendências culturais. Uma prática que trouxe resultados significativos foi a utilização de dados de sentimento de mercado capturados de mídias locais e sociais, que muitas vezes revelaram riscos e oportunidades não detectados por dados financeiros tradicionais. Integrar essa camada de análise permite uma visão mais rica e fundamentada para decisões estratégicas.

When comparing companies in emerging markets, thorough data collection is essential for accurate analysis. Financial statements provide a clear view of the company’s financial health. Analyzing macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth, inflation, and currency fluctuations, help to gauge how external conditions might impact future performance. Industry reports, consumer trends, and political stability are crucial factors for a comprehensive evaluation. Advantages: •) Provides a well-rounded view of financial and economic positioning •) Helps anticipate market trends and assess risk exposure Challenges: •) Data accuracy and availability can vary between regions •) Requires awareness of local regulatory frameworks and political influences

Normalizing reporting periods by adjusting Financial Years for both peers and the target company. Adjusting the COGS by eliminating depreciation if it's included. Additionally, ensuring that specific COGS components are consistent, such as capitalized labor and overhead, selling expenses, licensing fees, royalties, and shipping costs. Ensuring that EBITDA is calculated consistently. There are certain elements that fall into a "grey zone", including FX impacts, restructuring costs, and impairments. My recommendations are: realized FX should go before EBITDA, while unrealized FX, restructuring costs, and impairments should be go below EBITDA. Lastly, normalize net income by eliminating any unusual gains and losses.

About 140 countries have adapted fully or partially to IFRS, 71% adoption rate. There are still many countries using local GAAPS and care should be taken in comparing figures across countries. The quality of accounting differs considerably from one firm to another. Recent decades have seen too many accounting frauds to name. Most data platforms use some standards formulas to extract information which may inadvertently distort multiples and metrics. Hence, in picking comparable companies, I would suggest using either a large data set with different markets to mitigate the noise effect or picking specific companies in the same geography then deep diving into their books to ensure quality and consistency, making adjustments when necessary.

When comparing and benchmarking the performance of companies in different emerging markets or regions, it's crucial to adjust and normalize data to ensure a fair and accurate comparison. Variations in accounting standards, currency exchange rates, inflation, and economic conditions can distort the raw data. To mitigate these issues, you should standardize financial metrics, such as adjusting revenue and profitability for inflation or currency fluctuations. Additionally, normalizing for differences in market maturity or industry structure allows for a more apples-to-apples comparison, providing clearer insights into relative performance.

Start by defining your scope and criteria for comparing companies in emerging markets. Focus on key areas such as: - Market Focus: Target high-growth regions or sectors, such as Southeast Asia or Latin America. - Financial Metrics: Evaluate indicators like revenue growth, profitability, and debt levels. - ESG Factors: Consider Environmental, Social, and Governance aspects for long-term sustainability. Steps to Consider: - Establish clear objectives for valuation, such as fair value or acquisition potential. - Apply filters based on industry, size, or growth metrics to refine your comparison.

First and foremost, the valuer must select the appropriate multiples that s/he is going to apply. As the multiples are categorised in two - earnings multiple and EV multiple. S/he will also do good if multiples from both the categories are taken. Care should be exercised in selecting multiples and they must be dovetailed to the characteristics of business model of the firm under valuation. For instance, a manufacturing company should have installed capacity as one of the multiples; a software firm should consider the number of human resource; an FMCG company should consider number of brands and so on.

Even within the same industry, commonly invoked valuation methods can vary depending on where the company is listed. For e.g., real estate companies tend to be valued on a P/NAV basis in certain countries, while P/E is more commonly used in others. Analysts have to be aware of this difference, for even if you have the most perfect valuation model, your valuation output doesn’t really count for much if most of the other market participants don’t agree with you. I.e., the mispricing gap that you perceive may never close as you are essentially operating from another dimension. To understand local valuation conventions, it is advisable to attend investment conferences, read up reports written by local analysts, and speak to them if possible.

When comparing companies across different emerging markets, calculating and comparing valuation multiples like EV/EBITDA, P/E, or P/BV is essential. Adjust these multiples for regional factors such as economic stability, growth prospects, and currency risk to ensure accurate comparisons. Normalizing these multiples for differences in accounting standards and market conditions helps to uncover relative valuations, allowing investors to identify potential mispricing's or opportunities. This approach ensures that you’re not just comparing numbers, but understanding the broader context behind them, leading to more informed investment decisions.

To compare companies across emerging markets, calculate important valuation metrics such as P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, and EV/FCF. These metrics provide insights into how a company's market value is related to its financial performance. Key Steps: - Standardize Metrics: Ensure consistency in how metrics are calculated across different regions - Contextual Analysis: Interpret metrics within the relevant market and economic context, taking into account factors like growth expectations and market sentiment - Comparative Analysis: Use these ratios to compare the target company against its peers Considerations: - Market Sentiment: Metrics can be influenced by investor perceptions - Economic Conditions: Adjust for regional economic differences

When comparing and benchmarking companies across different emerging markets, applying valuation adjustments is essential. This involves adjusting for factors like country-specific risks, currency fluctuations, inflation rates, and local regulatory environments. These adjustments ensure that the valuation reflects the true economic reality of each market, allowing for a more accurate and meaningful comparison. By normalizing these differences, you can better assess the relative performance and potential of companies across diverse regions, ensuring that your analysis is both rigorous and globally relevant.

Aplicar ajustes de avaliação exige uma análise criteriosa e contextualizada. Quando trabalhamos com empresas de diferentes mercados emergentes, percebemos que ajustes bem fundamentados são essenciais para refletir a realidade econômica de cada região. Além dos fatores como risco-país ou volatilidade cambial, um ajuste eficaz deve considerar também elementos como a maturidade do mercado local e o estágio de desenvolvimento da indústria. Utilizar uma abordagem baseada em dados para ajustar múltiplos de avaliação pode revelar oportunidades de investimento ou alertar sobre riscos não tão evidentes, permitindo decisões mais estratégicas e alinhadas ao contexto real.

When benchmarking companies across emerging markets, apply valuation adjustments to reflect differences in risk and growth. Identify Key Differences: Country Risk: Adjust for geopolitical and economic instability. Growth Potential: Consider market conditions and growth rates. Competitive Advantage: Evaluate market position and brand strength. Adjust Multiples: Discounts/Premiums: Apply based on risk and growth prospects. Risk Premiums: Add for higher regional volatility. Consider Factors: Financial Stability: Adjust for liquidity differences. Operational Efficiency: Reflect in valuations. Judgment: Market Sentiment: Factor in perceptions. Expert Insights: Use local analyst input. Ensure consistency and transparency in your adjustments.

MSCI Emerging Markets Index is key also. It gauges stock performance in 21 developing economies across varied sectors. Companies are assessed based on market size, liquidity, and accessibility to international investors. For benchmarking, performances are compared against this index, utilized widely by investors for evaluating investments in these markets. The index, updated regularly, reflects emerging markets' growth potential and risks, offering insights for informed investment decisions.