Pisces Foundation reposted this
Just about everyone I know in the environmental and climate space is asking a fundamental question: how do we make progress in the years to come? As an advocate and now funder, I wrestle with two competing realities: pride in our progress and recognition that the pace and scale of our challenges requires even more. So what now? There are many good ideas out there, but I hope we will resist the tendency to overfocus on tactical shifts—local v. national, inside v. outside, and so on. And while we oppose the rollbacks that started even before the Inaugural Ball, and those sure to come, we shouldn't avoid something brewing well before January 20. I hope we can engage what is, for me, the fundamental issue: the strength of our strategic posture. The most important shift we can make is to focus less (relatively speaking) on developing policy and more on policy’s pre-requisites: influence and power. We have solutions. We need more sway. This requires, as it has for other social movements, a far broader, diverse, and connected set of advocates and allies. And steady—and more—funding for the movement infrastructure collective work requires (ICYMI, not a strength of philanthropy). Individual NGOs remain vital. But we grow strategic leverage in collectives that can be far more influential. I made this point in the The New York Times, in response to an article listing tactical changes the environmental movement could make. For sure, many of these approaches could advance our efforts. But they are not the same thing as confronting and directly addressing an imbalanced policy-power equation. I hear more willingness today to consider fundamental shifts and to connect to generate good ideas together. This is welcome—not just because it can enhance our effectiveness. Our connections are also a deep form of mutual support, a salve in tough moment, and a great place to begin the work of the second half of this pivotal decade. https://lnkd.in/gYuYWN6n